Author Topic: The murder of 14 year-old schoolgirl Jodi Jones near Edinburgh on 30 June 2003  (Read 1055835 times)

0 Members and 17 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline tyler

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2395
I was reading the following old news article and was completely stunned! It just about sums up everything that is so very wrong with this case  >:(


    http://www.scotsman.com/news/scotland/top-stories/the-clues-that-snared-a-murderer-1-959390

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
dobbis lying his arse of there.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
of course the role of sky news has yet to be investigated.

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
of course the role of sky news has yet to be investigated.

what did sky news do?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
well  i say there role its just what i belive.

the turned up at lukes house on the day of jodis funruel and asked for an interview ive luke had been told not to atend jodis funruel but i have allway wondered how sky news knew luke would be avialeble.

i also wonder why it was so important to them that the interview happened that day.

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Another great article by Bob Smyth about the case.

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/466367/FBI-profile-of-Jodi-killer-points-to-wrong-verdict

Nearly 10 years after the trial, the FBI profile was finally obtained following a freedom of information application in the USA... but most of the details were blanked out.

We know the profile was never depended on at trial (I know they're not allowed as evidence, but they'd have found a way of letting the world and his brother know if the profile had, in any way, implicated Luke), but what wasn't known until just a few years ago, is that the defence tried to get the profile from the prosecution, and were blocked, just like they never got the funding to have the DNA tested for the defence, or the cell site analysis carried out to ascertain whether or not Luke left his own home at the material time!

The DNA testing's an odd one - the defence team and the Legal Aid board blamed each other - the defence said funding was refused, the Legal Aid Board said the deffence never completed the application. The file was then "lost" (how very convenient) so we never did get to the bottom of it!

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
Quote
The murder is currently unsolved. However, inquiries have polarised on building a circumstantial case against a prime suspect.

This quote, from the Express article, is the exact wording of the initial enquiry from Lothian and Borders Police to the FBI - an outright admission that they were not "investigating" anything, they were constructing a case against Luke.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
now why am inot shocked by this.

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
When you think of the cost of obtaining this report (two senior officers flown to the states for 5 days, plus the FBI's charges), it is outrageous that they then refused to hand it over to the defence, telling them, instead, they'd have to apply directly to the FBI for it.

Bearing in mind that it's all paid for by tax payers' money - prosecution and defence - the simple act of refusing the defence a copy meant the tax payer also had to foot the bill for the defence team being sent on a wild goose chase because the FBI could not release the profile to the defence un-redacted, because the defence team was not the FBI's client.

But even that's not the worst of it. The prosecution's refusal to release the profile to the defence was (presumably - I've never actually seen a written reason) because it could not undermine the prosecution case or assist the defence case (the criteria on which the decision to disclose is supposed to be based) because it is inadmissable in British courts. Rewind - all of that expense, and they knew, from the outset, it could never be used as evidence?

Who sanctioned that expense? And in what ways could it possibly be justified?

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
so basscally they are now admiting they dident bother to investigate anything.

Offline sandra L

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 975
so basscally they are now admiting they dident bother to investigate anything.

That's the thing, nugnug - when they worded their request to the FBI the way they did, they were admitting, outright, that they had nothing, and that they weren't "investigating" anything, they were just looking to construct a circumstantial case. However you look at it, they were openly admitting that they hadn't a clue what happened to Jodi but, since they needed someone to be held accountable, they were going to build a "model" of what could have happened, according to their own theory, and based on not a shred of concrete evidence.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
well now its officail that the police had no intention of properly investigating the case.

Lithium

  • Guest
Jodi Jones killer Luke Mitchell demands right to study Satanic textbooks in prison due to his 'religious beliefs'

MITCHELL, who is serving life in Shotts prison, has requested a copy of The Satanic Bible, which calls for followers to create a lawless world where human sacrifice and murder are not only tolerated but encouraged.



Luke Mitchell is serving life for the murder of Jodi in June 2003
JODI Jones’s killer Luke Mitchell has demanded the right to be given Satanic textbooks in jail because of his “religious beliefs”.

Mitchell wants six books including The Devil’s Notebook and Satan Speaks, claiming it’s his human right to have access to the occult materials.

Mitchell, 25, also wants a copy of The Satanic Bible, which calls for followers to create a lawless world where there is no right or wrong and where human sacrifice and murder is not only tolerated but encouraged.

He made the request to the chaplain of Shotts prison where he is serving life for the murder of Jodi in June 2003.

It is officially under consideration by the Scottish Prison Service, who can ban prisoners from receiving books that don’t come from an approved list of suppliers.

Three of the requested texts are by Anton Szandor LaVey, the American founder of the Church of Satan, and include essays on demons, Nazism, cannibalism, death and child abuse.

In The Satanic Bible, he promotes human sacrifice and discusses the conditions in which someone could be considered “fit and proper” as a human sacrifice.

LaVey states: “The answer is brutally simple. Anyone who has unjustly wronged you.”

One of the other titles, Satan Speaks!, has a foreword by goth rocker Marilyn Manson, whose paintings and music were said to have inspired Mitchell’s murder of Jodi.



Mitchell wants access to The Satanic Bible 
Mitchell’s Satanic links were highlighted during his trial, where he was described as “truly wicked” by judge Lord Nimmo Smith. However, he still protests his innocence.

One source said: “Mitchell’s supporters have always downplayed his links to Satanism but it’s clear he has a
serious interest in the subject.

“Some people think he is playing a game and is trying to cause mischief. He’s still fighting his conviction. How can surrounding yourself with Satanic materials make a good impression? People are surprised.”

Mitchell was only 15 when he stabbed his 14-year-old girlfriend to death in Easthouses, Midlothian.

Jodi’s mutilated body was found in woods near her home a few hours after she had set off to meet Mitchell. Her hands were tied behind her back, her throat had been slashed and there were cuts to her face, breast and abdomen.

It emerged Mitchell had scratched 666 into his arm with a compass and drew Satanic symbols and quotes on his schoolbooks.

At his trial, prosecutors highlighted that he was a Marilyn Manson fan who had shown an interest in the Black Dahlia, a notorious unsolved 1947 murder when aspiring Hollywood actress Elizabeth Short was mutilated. It also emerged he had a demonic tattoo done while under investigation for Jodi’s murder.

Prosecutors revealed his school essays included lines such as “People like you need Satanic people like me to keep the balance” and “Just because I have chosen to follow the teachings of Satan doesn’t mean I need psychiatric help”.

Murdered teenager Jodi Jones 
Elizabeth Rudman, a criminologist with over 20 years’ experience, said: “This is extreme material and it is very interesting that he has asked for these items halfway through his sentence. I am taken aback that he is asking for these Satanic materials at this point.

“My problem is that the rituals involved in these materials are really anti-social and they elicit deeds that are against the law, such as human sacrifice.

“This person was convicted for murder. My first question would be: what is he going to plan now?

“It is possible Mitchell has given up completely. On the other hand, it can also be an indication of guilt.

“He has been in prison for so long, his hope of getting an appeal has been completely quashed, so now he may be showing his true convictions.”

The Scottish Prison Service said: “Any request by a prisoner for materials on the grounds of religious practice would be considered carefully and risk-assessed by our chaplaincy team.”

Sources said Mitchell would not be given any materials that could incite violence or anti-social behaviour.

Lithium

  • Guest
What a Grade A xxxx this guy is. 10 years on and he's still not grown out of this "phase".
« Last Edit: May 15, 2014, 07:27:AM by maggie »

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17245
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
she asked to read a book so what.

at the end of the day he asked to take a lie detecter and passed all the the case are shit scared to do so.
« Last Edit: May 15, 2014, 01:25:AM by nugnug »