On the contrary: Mike has done sterling work on the issue of the silencer,which was a crucial part of the trial at the time. Though I don't accept that Police shot Sheila with a silencer he has cast doubt on its role in the killings which could well affect any subsequent appeal or call for retrial.
I must have missed it, what sterling work did he do?
Things started out with him asserting a group many think is a fiction of his mind CYCLOPS (an alleged cold case group though this is a closed case not cold case so makes no sense) would be able to test the gun and prove it had Sheila's blood in it because a pullthrough would have missed blood trapped in the rifling. The reality though is that a pull through can thoroughly clean out a barrel and there is no evidence at all of a cold case squad being assigned to review the Bamber case.
Next he jumped to the moderator. In the past he alleged there were 3 different moderators. This time he reduced it to 2 moderators.
One moderator was of course the one provided by the family to police on 8/12/85 which did in fact occur. The second moderator was one he initially claimed was provided by Ann Eaton in September. After a while that changed to claiming it was collected from WHF on the day of the murders by Stanley Jones but never offered a shred of proof to establish one was collected period that date let alone by Jones.
He initially alleged 1 moderator had the paint evidence while the other had the blood evidence and they were merged together.
He subsequently abandoned that claim and alleged neither moderator had any evidence when initially in police custody.
He initally claimed 1 moderator was in police custody while another was in the lab though he offered no evidence at all to prove such.
Subsequently he alleged the moderator found at WHF on 8/7/85 was given to the family at the end of August after nothign was found on it or in it and was in the custody of the family while the other was in the lab being tested.
Upon be challenged as to why the police would give the family a moderator that had been collected from WHF thus would have to be returned to Jeremy and if true they had done so then his claim 1 was in police custody while the other was at the lab could not be true, he changed his claims again.
He changed to claiming that the one collected from the family was returned to them at the end of August but it was doctored by the family then returned to police on 9/11/85 and then sent to the lab on 9/13/85.
He initially alleged the moderator collected from WHF on the day of the murders by Stanley Jones was taken into evidence as SJ/1 while the one from the fmaily was SBJ/1 but later changed swapped the designations claiming the one by police was SBJ/1 and the one from the family SJ/1.
Then he changed course and started alleging that items taken from Colchester were in fact taken from WHF by Hammersley and had been classified DRH/1-4 but were later changed to DRH 50-53 and police then used DRH/1-4 for casings they pretended were found in the master bedroom. The document he used to try to pvrove this was correcting errors in Hammersley's typed statement where the typist messed up and marked DRH 1-4 for items taken from Colchester. How coudl items taken from Colchester have been found at WHF on the day of the murders? His claims were a complete sham.
At the end of the day what did he prove?
All he proved is that he was making up things as he went along and will distort to the bitter end. He kept changing his claims over and over again. It is in black and white to see how his claims were being formuated and molded until he finally was happy with the final tale.
What evidence did he provide to establish his final tale? None.
What evidence was provided to establish a moderator was collected on the day of the murders from WHF? None
What evidence was provided to establish SBJ/1 was designated to a moderator other than the one collected from Ann Eaton on 8/12/85? None.
What evidence was provided to establish SJ/1 was designated to the moderator collected from Ann Eaton on 8/12/85? None other than evidence provided by me which established that SJ/1 was the tentiatve classification Cook assigned in his notebook but after consulting with Jones was changed to SBJ/1 so the number used on all the official documents was SBJ/1 and that includes documents conveying it to the lab. So the lab documents referring to analyzing SBJ/1 are clearly referring to the moderator from the family.
What evidence was provided to establish that police returned the moderator to the family at the end of August? None
What evidence was provided to establish Ann Eaton gave a moderator to police in September? None
The only thing that came from this thread is that Mike is a liar and can't be trusted.
