A stop needs to be made to other people changing the meaning of what I have been saying or posting, since the way these people are reporting these things they are trying to change the meaning and purpose of what I report. Sometimes, I am reporting what is posted elsewhere on other web sites, sometimes I am reporting what has been posted on our forum, or in newspaper reports or TV bulletins, or be reference to some evidential fact contained in the case files, yet there are some who are repeatedly altering these references as though I have said this, or I have said that...
A typical example, is where these other people have been saying that Sheila was shot on the second occasion two hours or more after the first shot across the neck was inflicted, which is not something I have been saying at all. Although there is evidence available to confirm that there was ample delay between the firing of the two shots, where blood that ran from the original bullet wound on Sheila's neck, and the rear of her nightdress, which had clearly already dried before the second shot was discharged in her neck under the chin, a feature everyone can see in the photograph posted previously. What I would like to do, is ask everyone how long do you think the blood trail from the lower non fatal wound on her neck was inflicted, as compared to the fresh looking blood that was photographed running, pouring and leaking from the upper fatal bullet wound?
There is clearly a significant delay, between the firing of both shots, not only in the angle of the rifle at the time each shot was discharged, but chiefly because the first shot was non fatal, and the second shot was fatal. The delay between both shots (bullet PV/20 and PV/19) can be seen in the photographs taken at around 10 O'clock by PC Bird (SOC), where the vertical blood trail is dried, whilst the horizontal blood trails are wet and fresh looking...
Linked to these discrepancies, is the presence of the heavy bloodstain present upon the rear of Sheila's nightdress which had clearly dried prior to her body being laid out on the bedroom floor adjacent to the parents bed. None of the blood on the rear of the nightdress was transferred onto the rug / carpet beneath Sheila's body where it was photographed from around 10 O'clock onwards, so it is safe to assume, safe to conclude, that the lower bullet wound on Sheila's neck, with its corresponding vertical dried blood stain running down her neck, is linked and associated to the dried bloodstain on the reverse of her nightdress, and that in fact Sheila must have been laid somewhere else at the scene beforehand, somewhere where the blood on the reverse of her nightdress was replicated or transferred onto the bed in the main bedroom, or the floor in the kitchen...
