The flake was loose inside the silencer, people should try to get thier facts right, there is absolutely no evidence that the crucial flake of blood was scraped off the first two baffles, how the heck could that have been done? Who scraped it off if it was scraped off, I have never heard anything so ludicrous as this until now, and take it from me the flake in question was loose, not static...
None of the static blood discovered on baffles 1 and 2, had the exact same matching blood group results as those obtained from the flake which gives a clear indication that the flake was not scraped off baffles 1and 2...
I have my facts straight you do not.
The flake of blood was scraped off according to the expert who tested it. The court noted that the blood DRIED In the suppressor in between the 1st and second baffles.
There was no loose blood floating around you just pretend it was because that is the only way you can pretend the blood could have been transferred while already dry.
You have no basis to make such a claim though. You do not follow the evidence you try to misrepresent it for your biased purposes.
That is why you have no credibility with the public at large.
You may not care but having no crediblity means you ar enever going to be able to convice the public of anything and certainly not any court.
Your claims about June loading the gun and being the one who beat Nevill is clever because the physical evidence out there can't disprove it for sure. But on the other hand can't confirm it either so it is an argument worthless at freeing Jeremy (because only something that can be proven would be of value to free him)and at best could serve to sway the opinion of some of the public to get them behind Jeremy.
Based on the reaction here though it will not even do that since staunch Jeremy supporters don't even accept June taking part, especially since she was shot in bed before getting up. They didn't buy your claim she fell onto the bed after being shot (save look who would believe you are Jesus if you told her it).
You can make any claims you want but when you say things that are wrong like that the tested flake was floating around then you go from someone trying to find ways to establish Jeremy could be innocent to someone distorting to try to pretend Jeremy is innocent.
The distinction might not seem like much but there is a big difference between someone pointing out gaps like the failure to test June for GSR and foreign blood and being opportunistic and trying to use those gaps to their advantage and misrepresenting things like the blood flake floating around and not being static.
Once you are known as a liar you lose all credibility, everything you say is dismissed and you are largely ignored.
