Author Topic: the shooting party in scotland.  (Read 12949 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #75 on: May 31, 2014, 03:56:PM »
weather a person who had no intrest in guns and couldn't youse guns was at a shooting event is a very easy ustion to give a definite answer to.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #76 on: May 31, 2014, 04:16:PM »
funny her husband dident say she was uncoordinated and and couldn't use a gun.

and that when she was first accused of the murders he went along with it.

in fact nobody who dident have a vested interested in jeremys conviction mentions her not being able to use a gun.

the relatives said more than they had never seen they said she was uncoordinated and couldn't shoot.

Post exact quotes from someone who said they saw her shoot.  aht is ean easy enough challenge.

By your logic you intentioanlly lied about DP stating eh saw her shoot so nothign you say is trustwrothy and you must provide absolute evidenc eot bakc up your claims not continue to pretend peopel said anythign you feel like.

It is put up or shit up time post evidence not unsupported claims about what people stated.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #77 on: May 31, 2014, 04:19:PM »
its called an opinion you idiot.

and you dont other people what they can and cant say on a forum.
« Last Edit: May 31, 2014, 04:20:PM by nugnug »

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #78 on: May 31, 2014, 04:26:PM »
its called an opinion you idiot.

and you dont other people what they can and cant say on a forum.

Unsupported opinion doesn't mean much, what matters is supported claims.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #79 on: May 31, 2014, 04:29:PM »
yes but ive got the right to have them on expressing them regardless of what you think.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #80 on: May 31, 2014, 04:32:PM »
yes but ive got the right to have them on expressing them regardless of what you think.

You do indeed
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #81 on: May 31, 2014, 05:02:PM »
so the qustion is did colin just imagene going to scotland as a beater with his wife to scotland or were they both actully there.

i know wich version of events i belive.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #82 on: May 31, 2014, 05:20:PM »
so the qustion is did colin just imagene going to scotland as a beater with his wife to scotland or were they both actully there.

i know wich version of events i belive.

Post the claims he made verbatim.  Then we will discuss any such claims.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #83 on: May 31, 2014, 07:19:PM »
It is up to the defence to prove Sheila went on these shooting holidays and she was able to load this rifle. I have not seen such proof.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #84 on: May 31, 2014, 07:22:PM »
Post the claims he made verbatim.  Then we will discuss any such claims.

I've a feeling this won't happen.

Offline nugnug

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 17252
    • http://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&ved=0CDMQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fjohnnyvoid.wordpress.com%2F&ei=WTdUUo3IM6mY0QWYz4GADg&usg=AFQjCNE-8xtZuPAZ52VkntYOokH5da5MIA&bvm=bv.5353710
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #85 on: May 31, 2014, 07:32:PM »
we already did lists the sources for our cliams we cant help it if your to pig ignorant to bother to readt our post propeerly.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #86 on: May 31, 2014, 07:40:PM »
Colin Caffell went on shooting parties with the relatives and Sheila ?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #87 on: May 31, 2014, 09:07:PM »
Colin Caffell went on shooting parties with the relatives and Sheila ?


It certainly wouldn't be beyond the realms of possibility.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #88 on: May 31, 2014, 09:10:PM »
Of course Sheila knew how to use a gun. A girl brought up on a farm, come on!

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: the shooting party in scotland.
« Reply #89 on: May 31, 2014, 09:38:PM »
Of course Sheila knew how to use a gun. A girl brought up on a farm, come on!

The desperate fallback position when Jeremy supporters can't produce any evidence she actually ever did use a gun.

One which ignores that just living on a farm doesn't mean one has used a guns and morover guns are different and knowing how to use one doesn't make one able to use all by any stretch.

The lack of knowledge that a round needs to be chambered let alone how to do so results in this:

"As Ford drew near, Fromme pulled a .45-caliber semiautomatic pistol, aimed it at the president and pulled the trigger. Witnesses nearby heard the "click" of the hammer dropping. Secret Service agents later found that the pistol had four rounds in its magazine, but the chamber was empty.

Agents swarmed Fromme and wrestled the weapon from her hand as she shouted, "Don't get excited! It didn't go off! It didn't go off!"

http://www.sfgate.com/nation/article/Would-be-assassin-Squeaky-Fromme-is-paroled-3221893.php

As significant or even moreso is whether she had any interest in guns and would be likely to go for one as opposed to her weapon of choice in the past and the preferred weapon of women- pots/pans.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry