You run on about how stable was her medication. Are you psychic. By whose authority do you make such a sweeping claim. That you can't, or perhaps that SHOULD be DON'T, produce facts to say that people on meds CAN commit murder suicide, doesn't mean that it HASN'T happened/ WON'T ever happen. Such is the nature of mental illness.
The fact it is EXCEEDINGLY rare means that you and everyone else here have no ability at all to say that her mental issues make her likely to have killed anyone. You say she had mentla issues so she liekly did it in lieu of providing any evidence she did a thing.
Even worse though you try to use the claim it theoretically is possible this was an exception to the rule someone refutes evidence tha tproves she didn't do it.
The biggest and most glaringly obvious thing you've ignored is the change in Sheila's emotional and psychological state during the 18 from leaving the hospital until her death. I won't again go through the disappointing and heartbreaking events which caused the change because I imagine you're as aware of them as I. Where you also aware that despair and hopelessness are just as likely to be the cause of tragic events as schizophrenia?
On the contrary I actually taking into account all aspects of her emotional state including changes occurring after her treatment, you don't. I also respect the opinion of the doctor who treated her whereas you reject it in favor of opinions by people who neve rmet her and are in no position to challenge his assessments simply because you prefer to accecpt assessments that she could have killed.
Let's look again at the outright deception fo Jeremy supporters:
1) Cite things Sheila said and felt before she was treated for Schizohrenia. She stopped having these delusions and fellings after being treated. But Jeremy supporters say let's cite them anyway because they discuss her family and we want to believe she hurt her family. At her second hospital stay she didn't mention her faily, no delusions about them or problems. So the delusions she had that led to her second breakdown were not about her family. Since this hurts the claim she would harm her family Jeremy supporters ignore the present situation and harken back to 1983 delusions before she was treated.
2) Similarly Jeremy supporters choose to ignore that she found religion and bonded with her mother over it and that according to Colin was closer to her than at any time he knew them. This is very bad because this cuts against Sheila attacking her mother. She was much closer to Nevill than her mother in the meantime. So supporters harken back to claims about how Sheila would be upset after she returned home from WHF. Why would she be upset? Because her mother preached to her that sleepign around and doing drugs was sinful and she didn't want to hear it. But alas she now was on the same page as her mother religion wise so had no reason to be upset about her preaching the last visit.
3) Supporters choose to ignore that she had relapses because she stopped taking her medication and/or was high on drugs. She was on her medicaiton and not on narcotics or alcohol. Therefore the circumstances that would make her relapse were not present.
4) That mothers who are depressed and decide to kill themselves do not take their entire family with them, if they do decide to commit suicide and take someone with them they choose their dependants.
5) the treating doctor is the one in th ebes tposition to assess the likelihood of violence
All of these things matter if one wants to actually be accurate and honest.
The ignoring of evidence cherrypicking is being done by Jeremy Supporters ESPECIALLY evidence that Sheila can't have killed herself which means all the speculation is exceedingly worhtless.
Scenario:
Jack threatened to kill his father in front of witnesses. Jack and his father have not been seen in days. Witnesses tell police about the threat and that they are worried. Jack's and his father are found shot to death. A rifle is found lying on Jack that later was ballisticly proven to have been the murder weapon. Police see a hole in Jack's chest and assume he killed his father then committed suicide. It is determined Jack was shot in the back and the bullet exited his chest. It is impossible that he shot himself in the back Jack was killed. Neither have gunshot residue or any blood from the other on their clothing or body. There is no evidence to establish Jack shot his father with the gun before someone took it from him and killed him with it. Nor is there any evidence Jack's father shot Jack then someone took it from him and killed him with it.
Even though Jack threatened his father it is meaningless because he could not have killed himself and there is no evidence he killed his father. Someone else walked away after killing him and this person also most likely killed his father.
The Bamber facts are similar except that Sheila didn't make any threats what is being used agaisnt Sheila is her mental state alone and that mental state is being misrepresented to falsely suggest it is likely that she did it but there is no such likelihood at all you need proof she did it and don't have such proof.
More importantly her mental state doesn't negate the fact she can't have killed herself. You can distort her mental state as much as you like it still doesn't help establish she killed anyone. She can't have killed herself, she was framed, Jeremy is the one who framed her and only the killer would frame her and be aware of the murders to have called police so that is why Jeremy will die in prison.
No amount of distortions about her mental state will have any ability to negate the evidence used to convict Jeremy. A skilled lawyer recognizes that negating such evidence is the only way to get Jerey freed. People who understand how evidence works and the concept of proof also understand this.
Biased people who don't want to face reality don't and spend their life twisting including twisting things that can't help prove their claims anyway.
