Much of what Adam has to say is too puerile to respond to. He asks questions that it isn't possible to give answers to and seems to thinks he's done something clever. You say that we "respond in a childish manner"? We are RESPONDING to HIS childish approach.
The points Adam made in the initial post are valid. There are indeed people here who assert that because Taff Jones beoieved it was 4 murders and a suicide that means it was and Jeremy is innocent.
Taff Jones made that assessment when all he had at his disposal were Jeremy's claims and the location of the bodies and gun being found on Sheila. His opinion is not worth much when it is based on so little.
His opinion certainly can't trump the processing of the evidence which followed.
He didn't specify who made the claim so people could just have ignored the thread completely. Instead people have tried to change the topic which incidentally seems to happen in every thread. I don't see the threads here staying on point much. They seem to always go off in other directions.
No part of the murders can be viewed in complete isolation but it seems no thread stays even remotely on point. The original subject is almost always forgotten.
