Author Topic: Taff Jones:  (Read 5523 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #15 on: June 11, 2014, 02:04:PM »
Ten condemnations ? Source please.

That is a lot for a policeman who worked in an area where there was little or no crime. Source available upon request.
Another example of your total ignorance of the case. If you knew just a little about this case you wouldn't need to keep asking for sources. What, you think we are deliberately lying to you? I've been reading up about this case for years. But you? You didn't even know that Shaw's book was in the archives. Very shallow aren't you?

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #16 on: June 11, 2014, 02:06:PM »
So you have not got a source. Oh dear.

Maybe you should stick to threads about withheld tapes which apparently would free Jeremy.
I've got the source and can easily pinpoint it for you. Unfortunately I'm not a lacky for a lazy person who obviously knows practically nothing about the case but that which you've read second hand from Wilkesy. Poor brainless boy.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2014, 02:07:PM by Grahame »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #17 on: June 11, 2014, 02:24:PM »
Prove me wrong then.

Show me the source that says the relatives were upset at when the wills were released.

Thought the wills had not been released when Jeremy was arrested. Which is why he tried to sell pictures of Sheila.

Source available upon request.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #18 on: June 11, 2014, 02:26:PM »
Ten condemnations ? Source please.

That is a lot for a policeman who worked in an area where there was little or no crime. Source available upon request.




Are you always so stupid,or is today a special occasion ? I said COMMENDATIONS,NOT CONDEMNATIONS

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44411
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #19 on: June 11, 2014, 02:28:PM »
Whatever. Source please.

Thank you.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #20 on: June 11, 2014, 02:36:PM »
Prove me wrong then.

Show me the source that says the relatives were upset at when the wills were released.

Thought the wills had not been released when Jeremy was arrested. Which is why he tried to sell pictures of Sheila.

Source available upon request.



Are you stupid enough to believe that "Sun" journo's are a reliable source of information?

Offline haughton

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 326
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #21 on: June 11, 2014, 04:45:PM »
Adam, 6.4 man,5.6 woman-

  the gun is the equalizer

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #22 on: June 11, 2014, 05:04:PM »
Equally. Jeremy isn't guilty Adam, because he was not liked, lived the high life and was a arrogant sod. This alone does not make him the killer...But, to incriminate someone for the pleasure of it is a crime in its self. I personally don't like Jeremy, I have said this before.   

This whole case lacks good solid evidence that places Jeremy at the crime scene. Instead the jury had to rely on testimonies and decide on who and what they believed rather than the said evidence.  ;D ;D ;D ;D

This case had plenty of solid evidence.  Much more evidence than in many murder cases some of which have only a witness account.

Here we have evidence that Jeremy framed his sister. Not a passive frame but an active frame where he is the one who alerted police to the crime.

You are living in a world of denial.  The evidence is so strong that you just pretend it doesn't exist because it pains you too much to face that it does.

The most hilarious part is you suggest there is evidence to establish Sheila did it but there is none at all.  There is no evidence Sheila fired a weapon, loaded a wepaon, beat anyone or was even in the same room as the others were killed and evidence establishes she can't have killed herself.

You overlook that lack of evidence even going so far to deny there was a struggle in the kitchen though one obviously occurred just because there is no way she coudl have beaten Nevill so severely as to break the gun and yet not break a nail(s) and get other abrasions and not even get any blood on herself.  Sheila didn't deliver the beating so you pretend it ever happened.

The evidence establishes the killer entered the master bedroom and shot June and Nevill 11 times.  That is the maximum load of the gun.  Sheila would not have known how let alone bothered to load 11. She loaded no bullets at all in fact based on the processing of her body and clothing. With the gun empty the killer either ran to the kitchen with Nevill giving chase or Nevill ran to the kitchen with the killer chasing him.  In the kitchen he jumped the killer and they wrestled over the gun. he suppressor was attached therefore it was able to break the ceiling lampshade as they fought over control and it also scratched the mantle of the aga and knocked various things over.  The killer gave Nevill 2 black eyes and broke his nose.  Eventually the killer gained sole control over the weapon and bashed him with the rifle.  He tried to block the blows with his arm.  His watch was torn from his arm in the process and various defensive wounds left there.  Eventually though the killer bashed his head in knocking him unconscious and breaking the rifle stock in the process.  The killer then reloaded and shot him 4 more times.

This is what the evidence establishes happens, the phone call form nevill to Jeremy neve roccurred.

Since this is so damaging to Jeremy you choose to pretend the murders did not go down this way and make up things tha thave no evientiary foundaiton at all.

You mock Adam but you look far more ridiculous than he does in your world of denail.

I disagree with Adam plenty but you use his as your whipping boy but his challenges for evidence and proof are valid and you can't provide any so instead you respond in a childish manner.

You are very hypocritical.

There is zero evidence that Sheila did anything yet you insist she did.  There is in fact evidence against Jeremy but you ignore it because of bias that is the bottom line.

Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #23 on: June 11, 2014, 05:15:PM »
Adam, 6.4 man,5.6 woman-

  the gun is the equalizer




You're telling me,haughton.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #24 on: June 11, 2014, 05:16:PM »
Jeeez, scipio, couldn´t you cut down a tad on the belittlements and ridicule of other posters. It is a nasty read!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #25 on: June 11, 2014, 05:18:PM »
Whatever. Source please.

Thank you.





Use the search on this forum. Never again should you have to repeat that bloody annoying word of yours which must make you feel SO important !

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #26 on: June 11, 2014, 05:19:PM »
Much of what Adam has to say is too puerile to respond to. He asks questions that it isn't possible to give answers to and seems to thinks he's done something clever. You say that we "respond in a childish manner"? We are RESPONDING to HIS childish approach.

Offline scipio_usmc

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9502
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #27 on: June 11, 2014, 05:19:PM »
Jeeez, scipio, couldn´t you cut down a tad on the belittlements and ridicule of other posters. It is a nasty read!

Funny because people here belittle Adam, me and others for daring to believing Jeremy is guity.
My posts demonstrate exactly how people are hypocritical though I don't just resort to childish belittlement like those who attack us.
Politeness is organized indifference- Paul Valéry

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #28 on: June 11, 2014, 05:21:PM »
Jeeez, scipio, couldn´t you cut down a tad on the belittlements and ridicule of other posters. It is a nasty read!





Worry not,Alias,,it's an indication of low intelligence and low self-esteem,to post in such a way. Always remember that,girl.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33781
Re: Taff Jones:
« Reply #29 on: June 11, 2014, 05:23:PM »
Funny because people here belittle Adam, me and others for daring to believing Jeremy is guity.
My posts demonstrate exactly how people are hypocritical though I don't just resort to childish belittlement like those who attack us.


I rather think THAT decision is in the hands of some of those who read what you have to say about them.