Author Topic: How could Sheila’s body have been found downstairs and upstairs.  (Read 47201 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Martin

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 272
How could Sheila’s body have been found downstairs and also upstairs.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1033.msg149409#msg149409

Quote
On a spectrum I must be pretty close to max on innocent and yet I totally disagree with Martin's assertions re a) SC being in the kitchen prior to the raid team entering and b) SC being found on the bed by EP.  Martin you can't have your fruitckake and eat it  @)(++(*.  a) and b) do not correspond with the SoC ie lack of blood on SC; also reinforced by the pathologist stating that he thought it unlikely SC moved from the position she was found in having received the first non-fatal wound...

...In a case such as JB's genuine errors will be made.  EP were not robots.  It appears some in the innocent camp want to seize on anomalies/administrative errors to support JB's MoJ but they simply do not stack up with the SoC and expert opinion.  This then plays into the hands of the guilty camp….

I'm not prepared to go along with any old nonsense!  If the likes of myself don't buy into it I hardly think it's likely to get very far with CCRC/CoA…

The idea that EP conspired to put JB behind bars knowing SC was responsible is IMO crazy.  I do believe that RB was able to exert undue pressure on EP. As a result a case was put together and 'evidence' fabricated by certain members of EP along with the rellies.  This was done on the basis that they genuinely believed JB responsible but lacked evidence to prove SC innocent and JB guilty.

I feel that I must comment on this rambling and, at times, dull witted post by one Holly Goodhead over at the red lagoon. This person says that I have asserted that Sheila’s body was found by the police in the kitchen and also upstairs on the bed.

Straight off, that is not true. I have merely drawn attention to the evidence that Sheila’s body was at one stage downstairs and at another stage upstairs.

It’s a vulgar mistake to confuse drawing attention to the evidence with the expression of an opinion. But even, as opinions go, there is no contradiction. She apparently thinks I have contradicted myself.

The logs

A series of log entries report that two bodies were found in the kitchen and that three more bodies were found upstairs, not four.This information is also backed up by Neil Davidson’s statement in which he relates that “one murder and one suicide” were reported as having been found downstairs.

Ann Eaton’s note

Ann Eaton’s note records that a policeman told her that Sheila’s body was found upstairs on the bed next to June with a bible on her chest.

The photographs of Sheila show her lying on the floor, but there is nothing to prove that at different stages she could not have been in those two other locations, before the body was stage managed by the police on the floor of the master bedroom.

The main point is simply that that is what the prima facie evidence points to, regardless of whether you consider it to be reliable or not.

Mike Tesko’s old theory

One merit of Mike’s old theory is that it tallies perfectly with the written evidence.

Mike used to think that Sheila attempted to commit suicide, shooting herself downstairs, not long before the police broke into the house.

Then some time later, she regained consciousness and made her way upstairs and (presumably) lay down on the bed.

I don’t know if Mike has ever suggested this, but one possibility is that Sheila took the bible from the drawer, before lying down on the bed. If that did happen, it would both explain the information in the logs and in Ann Eaton’s note. Even if that is not precisely what happened, it is a reasonable theory in relation to very definite and consistent log entries.


I consider this theory, which I base on Mike’s old theory, to be, at any rate, far superior, from a logical point of view, to the ridiculous idea that all the written evidence which points to Sheila being alive when Bamber was with the police just arose from a succession of mistakes-and mistakes which just happen to produce a consistent narrative as well!




« Last Edit: May 10, 2014, 03:37:AM by Martin »

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33764
How could Sheila’s body have been found downstairs and also upstairs.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1033.msg149409#msg149409

I feel that I must comment on this rambling and, at times, dull witted post by one Holly Goodhead over at the red lagoon. This person says that I have asserted that Sheila’s body was found by the police in the kitchen and also upstairs on the bed.

Straight off, that is not true. I have merely drawn attention to the evidence that Sheila’s body was at one stage downstairs and at another stage upstairs.

It’s a vulgar mistake to confuse drawing attention to the evidence with the expression of an opinion. But even, as opinions go, there is no contradiction. She apparently thinks I have contradicted myself.




How ironic that you're quick enough to complain -call it "a vulgar mistake" even- when you feel that YOU have been misinterpreted, but is it not an EQUALLY "vulgar mistake" to express as being FACT, what in YOUR opinion, is the meaning of what is said by another person.

No-Bits

  • Guest
How could Sheila’s body have been found downstairs and also upstairs.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1033.msg149409#msg149409

I feel that I must comment on this rambling and, at times, dull witted post by one Holly Goodhead over at the red lagoon. This person says that I have asserted that Sheila’s body was found by the police in the kitchen and also upstairs on the bed.

Straight off, that is not true. I have merely drawn attention to the evidence that Sheila’s body was at one stage downstairs and at another stage upstairs.

It’s a vulgar mistake to confuse drawing attention to the evidence with the expression of an opinion. But even, as opinions go, there is no contradiction. She apparently thinks I have contradicted myself.

The logs

A series of log entries report that two bodies were found in the kitchen and that three more bodies were found upstairs, not four.This information is also backed up by Neil Davidson’s statement in which he relates that “one murder and one suicide” were reported as having been found downstairs.

Ann Eaton’s note

Ann Eaton’s note records that a policeman told her that Sheila’s body was found upstairs on the bed next to June with a bible on her chest.

The photographs of Sheila show her lying on the floor, but there is nothing to prove that at different stages she could not have been in those two other locations, before the body was stage managed by the police on the floor of the master bedroom.

The main point is simply that that is what the prima facie evidence points to, regardless of whether you consider it to be reliable or not.

Mike Tesko’s old theory

One merit of Mike’s old theory is that it tallies perfectly with the written evidence.

Mike used to think that Sheila attempted to commit suicide, shooting herself downstairs, not long before the police broke into the house.

Then some time later, she regained consciousness and made her way upstairs and (presumably) lay down on the bed.

I don’t know if Mike has ever suggested this, but one possibility is that Sheila took the bible from the drawer, before lying down on the bed. If that did happen, it would both explain the information in the logs and in Ann Eaton’s note. Even if that is not precisely what happened, it is a reasonable theory in relation to very definite and consistent log entries.


I consider this theory, which I base on Mike’s old theory, to be, at any rate, far superior, from a logical point of view, to the ridiculous idea that all the written evidence which points to Sheila being alive when Bamber was with the police just arose from a succession of mistakes-and mistakes which just happen to produce a consistent narrative as well!

I'm not sure this is keeping up with the rules of the so called truce, but that's none of my business.

Anyway here is a more realistic scenario for the 1 dead male 1 dead female record:

There are two logs which have been produced and are available on this forum. In addition to that there are various other notes and statements.

The chain of communication is as follows:

1. Somebody informed CA07 of 1 dead male and one dead female. I do not know who informed them but I am suggesting that it was Adams who got it from the firearms team.

2. CA07 contacted the information room and informed them about "1 dead male, 1 dead female". The information room (Igor Norman) noted on the information rooms log "1 dead male, 1 dead female", he noted this on the front page of the log and in the table together with the corresponding time.

3. The information room contacted PC West and informed him of "1 dead male, 1 dead female", PC West noted this in his log.

4. Somebody contacted CA07 and told them that all 5 people were found dead. Again I don't know who contacted them but I am suggesting it was Adams.

5. CA07 contacted the information room and informed them that five bodies had been found, the information room noted on their log "all 5 persons found - DEAD".

6. The information room contacted PC West to inform him that five bodies had been found dead.

7. PC West noted on his log "now confirmed a further 3 bodies found - five dead in total".

... ..........................................................
The logs can be found in this thread which corroborates what I have written above: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,732.msg19630.html#msg19630
... ............................................................

Now my first observation that the "1 dead male, 1 dead female" came from a single source. If I am right about Adams informing CA07 then it came from the firearms unit, to Adams, to CA07, to the information room and then to PC West.

My second observation is that the "3 further bodies" is only recorded once by PC West and nobody else. The information regarding the rest of the bodies came from the firearms team, to Adams (if I am correct as previously mentioned), to CA07, to the information room and then to PC West.

... .......................................................
WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED? :

In my opinion Collins saw Ralph through the kitchen window and mistook him for a female, he radioed in to Adams. The firearms unit entered the house and found Ralph's body, the firearms unit radioed it in to Adams.
Adams then, thinking that 1 dead male and one dead female had been found, radioed in to CA07 (1 dead male was first because that was fresher in his mind, being the last communication), CA07 radioed it in to the information room who in turn radioed it in to PC West. Now at this stage in actual fact only one body had been found.
The firearms team then eventually went upstairs and discovered the other four bodies, they radioed this in to Adams, Adams informed CA07 and CA07 informed the information room. The information room noted that five bodies were found.
The information room radioed PC West and told him about the five bodies, PC West mistakenly noted that a further three bodies were found rather than there were five as he thought that two had previously been found when they had not.
« Last Edit: May 10, 2014, 09:20:AM by Harters »

No-Bits

  • Guest
Also the reliance on Davidson being informed that it was a murder and a suicde, in order to count up the number of bodies is somewhat flawed.

As can be seen in his COLP statement where he describes being told about a murder and suicide and that he took it as being one or two bodies. Clearly at that stage they simply didn't have a clue what was happening (the firearms team hadn't entered yet).


DAVIDSON COLP STATEMENT http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,590.msg12022.html#msg12022

Neil

  • Guest
I'm not sure this is keeping up with the rules of the so called truce, but that's none of my business.

Anyway here is a more realistic scenario for the 1 dead male 1 dead female record:

There are two logs which have been produced and are available on this forum. In addition to that there are various other notes and statements.

The chain of communication is as follows:

1. Somebody informed CA07 of 1 dead male and one dead female. I do not know who informed them but I am suggesting that it was Adams who got it from the firearms team.

2. CA07 contacted the information room and informed them about "1 dead male, 1 dead female". The information room (Igor Norman) noted on the information rooms log "1 dead male, 1 dead female", he noted this on the front page of the log and in the table together with the corresponding time.

3. The information room contacted PC West and informed him of "1 dead male, 1 dead female", PC West noted this in his log.

4. Somebody contacted CA07 and told them that all 5 people were found dead. Again I don't know who contacted them but I am suggesting it was Adams.

5. CA07 contacted the information room and informed them that five bodies had been found, the information room noted on their log "all 5 persons found - DEAD".

6. The information room contacted PC West to inform him that five bodies had been found dead.

7. PC West noted on his log "now confirmed a further 3 bodies found - five dead in total".

... ..........................................................
The logs can be found in this thread which corroborates what I have written above: http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,732.msg19630.html#msg19630
... ............................................................

Now my first observation that the "1 dead male, 1 dead female" came from a single source. If I am right about Adams informing CA07 then it came from the firearms unit, to Adams, to CA07, to the information room and then to PC West.

My second observation is that the "3 further bodies" is only recorded once by PC West and nobody else. The information regarding the rest of the bodies came from the firearms team, to Adams (if I am correct as previously mentioned), to CA07, to the information room and then to PC West.

... .......................................................
WHAT ACTUALLY HAPPENED? :

In my opinion Collins saw Ralph through the kitchen window and mistook him for a female, he radioed in to Adams. The firearms unit entered the house and found Ralph's body, the firearms unit radioed it in to Adams.
Adams then, thinking that 1 dead male and one dead female had been found, radioed in to CA07 (1 dead male was first because that was fresher in his mind, being the last communication), CA07 radioed it in to the information room who in turn radioed it in to PC West. Now at this stage in actual fact only one body had been found.
The firearms team then eventually went upstairs and discovered the other four bodies, they radioed this in to Adams, Adams informed CA07 and CA07 informed the information room. The information room noted that five bodies were found.
The information room radioed PC West and told him about the five bodies, PC West mistakenly noted that a further three bodies were found rather than there were five as he thought that two had previously been found when they had not.
That is the most plausible explanation I have read, to date.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
How could Sheila’s body have been found downstairs and also upstairs.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1033.msg149409#msg149409

I feel that I must comment on this rambling and, at times, dull witted post by one Holly Goodhead
over at the red lagoon. This person says that I have asserted that Sheila’s body was found by the police in the kitchen and also upstairs on the bed.

Straight off, that is not true. I have merely drawn attention to the evidence that Sheila’s body was at one stage downstairs and at another stage upstairs.

It’s a vulgar mistake to confuse drawing attention to the evidence with the expression of an opinion. But even, as opinions go, there is no contradiction. She apparently thinks I have contradicted myself.

The logs

A series of log entries report that two bodies were found in the kitchen and that three more bodies were found upstairs, not four.This information is also backed up by Neil Davidson’s statement in which he relates that “one murder and one suicide” were reported as having been found downstairs.

Ann Eaton’s note

Ann Eaton’s note records that a policeman told her that Sheila’s body was found upstairs on the bed next to June with a bible on her chest.

The photographs of Sheila show her lying on the floor, but there is nothing to prove that at different stages she could not have been in those two other locations, before the body was stage managed by the police on the floor of the master bedroom.

The main point is simply that that is what the prima facie evidence points to, regardless of whether you consider it to be reliable or not.

Mike Tesko’s old theory

One merit of Mike’s old theory is that it tallies perfectly with the written evidence.

Mike used to think that Sheila attempted to commit suicide, shooting herself downstairs, not long before the police broke into the house.

Then some time later, she regained consciousness and made her way upstairs and (presumably) lay down on the bed.

I don’t know if Mike has ever suggested this, but one possibility is that Sheila took the bible from the drawer, before lying down on the bed. If that did happen, it would both explain the information in the logs and in Ann Eaton’s note. Even if that is not precisely what happened, it is a reasonable theory in relation to very definite and consistent log entries.


I consider this theory, which I base on Mike’s old theory, to be, at any rate, far superior, from a logical point of view, to the ridiculous idea that all the written evidence which points to Sheila being alive when Bamber was with the police just arose from a succession of mistakes-and mistakes which just happen to produce a consistent narrative as well!

Why is it that someone has to be 'rambling', 'a troll', 'guilty of spreading propaganda', 'be Starryian' etc. SIMPLY because they don't agree with YOU? I won't bother commenting on the rest of your post because I would just be repeating myself but, Hartley's explanation of the logs seems pretty credible to me (and always did - but I'd never have admitted it before  ;D ;D ;D).
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076

How ironic that you're quick enough to complain -call it "a vulgar mistake" even- when you feel that YOU have been misinterpreted, but is it not an EQUALLY "vulgar mistake" to express as being FACT, what in YOUR opinion, is the meaning of what is said by another person.

Well said April!!
Few people have the imagination for reality

No-Bits

  • Guest
Why is it that someone has to be 'rambling', 'a troll', 'guilty of spreading propaganda', 'be Starryian' etc. SIMPLY because they don't agree with YOU? I won't bother commenting on the rest of your post because I would just be repeating myself but, Hartley's explanation of the logs seems pretty credible to me (and always did - but I'd never have admitted it before  ;D ;D ;D).


 >:( >:( >:( >:(

Lol  :D

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
>:( >:( >:( >:(

Lol  :D
Hi Caroline, have never been convinced by some interpretations of some of EPs logs they are too ambiguous to prove anything either way and therefore lay themselves open to interpretation depending on stance taken imo

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Hi Caroline, have never been convinced by some interpretations of some of EPs logs they are too ambiguous to prove anything either way and therefore lay themselves open to interpretation depending on stance taken imo

Well, apparently, there is only ONE interpretation and that's Martin's but of course we're not quite sure what he's trying to say because he doesn't explain himself very well. Is it just me or did he recently argue that he thought the police 'knowingly' framed an innocent Jeremy?
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
That is the most plausible explanation I have read, to date.
Plausible it may be. Speculation is what it is.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Sheila couldn´t have moved around the house after the first shot, it is clear from the blood pattern on her, so after learning a little bit more about the case than the "headline", One male and one female downstairs, I came to a conclusion very similar to Harters´.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Plausible it may be. Speculation is what it is.
Yes, I agree Grahame, it is plausible enough but it doesn't prove anything we don't already know ie.  there are very few facts and many possibilities :-\ :-\

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Plausible it may be. Speculation is what it is.

Of course but so are all of the other explanations - we can only go with what we 'imagine' happened. It would have been very confusing trying to keep the log straight when you're hearing the information second (or even third) hand.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
And I still stick by my own " theory " that the first shot was NOT a suicide shot. Second one----questionable.