Author Topic: The Noble Cause Framing Theory  (Read 65821 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #465 on: May 05, 2014, 10:47:PM »
Shucks. Never mind,,I'm laughing here at Benidorm which I've seen umpteen times ( repeats) but still funny. ;D ;D ;D ;D xxxxxxx.

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #466 on: May 05, 2014, 10:48:PM »
Ha, ha!! Nah, not tonight - gonna watch some telly then go to bed BUT there may be love notes for me in the morning??  ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D XX

I was once offered a meal with Jackie Preece.  :)

This forum is just breeding love and admiration.  :)

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #467 on: May 05, 2014, 10:52:PM »
I was once offered a meal with Jackie Preece.  :)

This forum is just breeding love and admiration.  :)

You do that to us, mat, you naughty boy!  8)

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #468 on: May 05, 2014, 10:53:PM »
Go for your life,Mat. ;D

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #469 on: May 05, 2014, 10:53:PM »
Ruuuunnnn!

guest154

  • Guest
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #470 on: May 05, 2014, 10:58:PM »
You do that to us, mat, you naughty boy!  8)

 ;D

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #471 on: May 05, 2014, 11:23:PM »
I was once offered a meal with Jackie Preece.  :)

This forum is just breeding love and admiration.  :)

Nah just sarcasm  ;D ;D ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #472 on: May 05, 2014, 11:28:PM »
Shucks. Never mind,,I'm laughing here at Benidorm which I've seen umpteen times ( repeats) but still funny. ;D ;D ;D ;D xxxxxxx.

Watching Britain's Favourite Stand-up, can't believe Frankie Boyle didn't make the top 10.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #473 on: May 06, 2014, 09:54:AM »
I was once offered a meal with Jackie Preece.  :)

This forum is just breeding love and admiration.  :)
I once had a meal with her. She's a vegetarian by the way. I found her quite pleasant to talk to. Nothing like the impression she gave on the forum.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #474 on: May 06, 2014, 10:50:AM »
Neither am I Grahame------------I'm worse ! ;D

You dark horse you. ;)

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #475 on: May 06, 2014, 11:48:AM »
Neither am I Grahame------------I'm worse ! ;D

You dark horse you. ;)
I met her in Chelmsford. We went to the police over the abuse she was receiving from  a couple of thugs from the so called red forum who were making her life hell.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #476 on: May 06, 2014, 04:58:PM »
I think that Jackie was one of a kind. Very dedicated and an enthusiast. I liked her well enough, why isnĀ“t she here anymore - yes, I am clueless!  :P

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #477 on: May 06, 2014, 06:09:PM »
 I've been reading a piece out of the Mail Online,,about psychopaths. Having a psychopathic trait is vital to winning lifes battles. I can go along with that to an extent. One can be a " good " psychopath,,as it doesn't always describe the really ruthless individuals that are always portrayed.
" Good " psychopaths can regulate their behaviour,,whereas bad ones can't.
A surgeon,for instance,,needs a certain level of psychopathy in order to cut himself off,,emotionally,,from his patients. Imagine being emotionally involved ? It would be impossible for him to continue in that profession.
Anyone with a tendency to get on in life,,as we've already discussed,,HAS to be devoid of compassion/emotion to be able to dismiss staff who aren't pulling their weight,,regardless of their circumstances personally.

Andy McNab tells his own story. In his beginning,,he was abandoned on the steps of Guys Hospital,,in a Harrods bag,,then later,adopted,,but a far-cry from Jeremys' upbringing,,as Andy was brought up on a rough housing estate in South West London where it was every man for himself,,and so his background dictated that he had to get on in life in order to remove himself from the horrors of a bleak future.   
« Last Edit: May 06, 2014, 06:11:PM by lookout »

Offline Jan

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 10318
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #478 on: May 06, 2014, 08:05:PM »
I just read the  interesting article on the  official website about victim support in relation to WHF,
something I did not know was what happened to Junes rings. Jeremy had refused the request from Anne Eaton to have the rings because they had never left his mothers fingers and he wanted them to remain there- so he assumed that they had been I guess cremated with his mother . In 2013 he found out that a police officer had ( illegally) removed the rings after the autopsy and given them to Anne. Had anyone else heard that ? I guess it is otherwise there would be a big fuss about him telling lies.

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: The Noble Cause Framing Theory
« Reply #479 on: May 06, 2014, 08:39:PM »
I just read the  interesting article on the  official website about victim support in relation to WHF,
something I did not know was what happened to Junes rings. Jeremy had refused the request from Anne Eaton to have the rings because they had never left his mothers fingers and he wanted them to remain there- so he assumed that they had been I guess cremated with his mother . In 2013 he found out that a police officer had ( illegally) removed the rings after the autopsy and given them to Anne. Had anyone else heard that ? I guess it is otherwise there would be a big fuss about him telling lies.

NO!

If this is true, it is DISGUSTING! I am truly appalled.