0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Thanks Maggie but not according to Martin - Not sure which question he thinks I haven't answered but I'm sure he'll be back to let me know - bless him!!
I take it you are referring to the note in the bible?
Yes,Caroline. Because it's been said that the bible was open on that particular page,,I looked it up. Then,,of course,the note.
The bible was open at page(s) 656 and 657 - Psalms 51-55, I think I just about know them off by heart now!!
It just shows how conflicting the evidence is because I'd read that it was John,chapter 13,verses 33 to 35,,which is what I quoted. Pertaining to The Last Supper. I think this is what was called The King John Bible.
There were two bibles taken from the scene .
Only one open next to Sheila though.
Would Jeremy have thought of doing this - somehow that seems far fetched to me? How did a bloodied palm-print get on the open page?
What reason would Jeremy have to leave a bible open at those pages if he was responsible for the murders ?There was no explanation as to why the bible was open specifically at the pages that it was ,,which matched the condition of Sheila.
Lookout, I don't know where the information came from, but I can quite see how The Last Supper provides a (spurious?) link to what happened. I've tried several times, but failed to find what I would call a SATISFACTORY link between Sheila and the psalms but I guess at the end of the day we can make anything fit anywhere.
What I quoted is evidence which is backed by documentation from the Jeremy Bamber site.