what new evidence?

[lookout]

Why would the police put a banner up. Strange thing to do. It does absolutly nothing to get Jeremy his freedom.

I have read half of AE's statement. It must be in the second half.

Nobody has said that the waving of a banner would get Jeremy his freedom.If you'd read my earlier post regarding this,I actually said that it would do him no favours if he broached the subject in any way--------at least until he's released .

[grahameb]

I am sure I had seen the photo of the banner - I was beginning to think I had imagined it.

Adam has been shown evidence that the police instigated the burning of the evidence, because I think it was in AE statement as well - he is just chosing to ignore it.

No that was a picture that campion put up of the house and questioned as to whether something on the roof was a banner. But it wasn't.

[Adam]

When I gave you the link on one occasion you proceeded to criticise the link which was in actual fact a police statement. But you still rejected it. So what is the point of giving you links. Also I asked you for a link many times but you never ever gave it to me. So again what is the point.

I have given you all requested links.

The last one regarding Jeremy changing his account of what happened Nevilles phone call.

[grahameb]

He mentioned it in 2005. Claiming it proved his innocence.

He referred to the document he didn't claim he heard it.

[grahameb]

I have given you all requested links.

The last one regarding Jeremy changing his account of what happened Nevilles phone call.

No you haven't. I asked you when Jeremy had said anything bad against JM  since the trial. You gave me a link to the Official Site. But it said nothing about that. But you just would not give me a direct link to it.

[Adam]

He referred to the document he didn't claim he heard it.

When did I say he heard it ?

How can you hear a document ?

Either way. The document clearly says there was no response. I cannot believe Jeremy tried to prove his innocence with it.

[Jane]

When did I say he heard it ?

How can you hear a document ?

Either way. The document clearly says there was no response. I cannot believe Jeremy tried to prove his innocence with it.

Can you provide us with the information where it stated that he did?

[nugnug]

ive never heard that before is there a source for this.

[Adam]

http://crimeheartsandcoronets.blogspot.com/2010/11/jeremy-bamber-guilty-as-charged.html?m=1

[lookout]

Can you tell me what forensic evidence proved that Jeremy carried out the murders,,if it was found there was none on Sheila ?

[Adam]

No you haven't. I asked you when Jeremy had said anything bad against JM  since the trial. You gave me a link to the Official Site. But it said nothing about that. But you just would not give me a direct link to it.

I also gave you the Sunday Times article.

The OS has a whole section on how Julie is a liar, criminal, makes false Witness Statements etc. It's on Jeremys OS.

[Adam]

Can you tell me what forensic evidence proved that Jeremy carried out the murders,,if it was found there was none on Sheila ?

What forensic evidence should there be ?

I have already posted 14 forensic reasons why Sheila did not committ the crime.

I have already posted the judges curious coincidences thread.

I have already given posters the chance to tell me how Sheila did it. Most refused.

I have already given posters the chance to say what Sheila was doing when Neville phoned Jeremy. No adequate answers given.

I have already posted 19 reasons/facts why Neville would not phone Jeremy.

[Jan]

No that was a picture that campion put up of the house and questioned as to whether something on the roof was a banner. But it wasn't.

Strangely enough I thought it was before I came on this forum that I saw it.

[lookout]

What forensic evidence should there be ?

I have already posted 14 forensic reasons why Sheila did not committ the crime.

I have already posted the judges curious coincidences thread.

I have already given posters the chance to tell me how Sheila did it. Most refused.

I have already given posters the chance to say what Sheila was doing when Neville phoned Jeremy. No adequate answers given.

I have already posted 19 reasons/facts why Neville would not phone Jeremy.

" What forensic evidence should there be  ?". Solid proof that Jeremy murdered his family,,that's what.
His blood,( during the " struggle " with his father ) Droplets of fresh sweat and spit .Hairs. mud on carpets.Fibres off clothes. Shredded skin. Proof he got in the farmhouse through a window  ( or did he get in through the letter-box  ? )
Forensic evidence forms the vital part of convicting someone,,not lies and hearsay.
It was the most unfair trial in this country,and the very least he deserves is a re-trial.

[Jan]

What forensic evidence should there be ?

I have already posted 14 forensic reasons why Sheila did not committ the crime.

I have already posted the judges curious coincidences thread.

I have already given posters the chance to tell me how Sheila did it. Most refused.

I have already given posters the chance to say what Sheila was doing when Neville phoned Jeremy. No adequate answers given.

I have already posted 19 reasons/facts why Neville would not phone Jeremy.

They are NOT FACTS .They are pure conjecture and nothing more .They have no relevance. I could give you 19 reasons why Sheila could have had a psychotic episode - but it does not PROVE the events on the night either .