what new evidence?

[Adam]

I've given Adam sources before. But they still don't convince him. So I've given up. Even very simple basic things about the case he doesn't know. He still just blindly fumbles about not learning anything new.

Sometimes you have given me sources. Sometimes not.

I am still waiting for the thread showing how a whole class of law students found Jeremy not guilty.

You also said lots of people testified for Jeremy in court. When I asked who, you posted a link mentioning the people who did not testify.

As it happens people did testify. Names of course provided upon request.

[Adam]

No he didn't use this document.

So he did not use a police document to claim there were conversations in the house. What the hell did he use ?

[Jan]

So he did not use a police document to claim there were conversations in the house. What the hell did he use ?

Out of interest do you think that every conversation that JB had with the police that night and every conversation they had with him was fully documented or even that we have seen everything  ?Especially as a lot of the statements were not taken until a month later - or are held under PII as they were to do with the original investigation?

[Adam]

Out of interest do you think that every conversation that JB had with the police that night and every conversation they had with him was fully documented or even that we have seen everything  ?Especially as a lot of the statements were not taken until a month later - or are held under PII as they were to do with the original investigation?

So what missed conversation is so important to be brought up now ?

And why didn't Jeremy mention it in 1985/86 ?

[Jane]

Out of interest do you think that every conversation that JB had with the police that night and every conversation they had with him was fully documented or even that we have seen everything  ?Especially as a lot of the statements were not taken until a month later - or are held under PII as they were to do with the original investigation?

Jansus, it seems to me that the whole of Jeremy's life along with his only ever utterances are encapsulated within a time frame stretching from the party prior to Sheila's last visit to his trial.

[Jane]

So what missed conversation is so important to be brought up now ?

And why didn't Jeremy mention it in 1985/86 ?

RHETORIC Adam. How the HELL would we know?

[tyler]

Adam. The info re: photos showing officers disrespecting the victims bodies etc is on JB's official website. When I can get on my pc,I will try to find the document that JB signed re: burning of items at whf.

[Jan]

So what missed conversation is so important to be brought up now ?

And why didn't Jeremy mention it in 1985/86 ?

Who knows? I was just asking you a question - because if JB relayed a conversation that was not documented you are just going to say he was lying anyway? 

After all the police are shown to have lied over the figure at the window - I am sure you have seen that video.

[Jan]

Adam. The info re: photos showing officers disrespecting the victims bodies etc is on JB's official website. When I can get on my pc,I will try to find the document that JB signed re: burning of items at whf.

I am sure I had seen the photo of the banner - I was beginning to think I had imagined it.

Adam has been shown evidence that the police instigated the burning of the evidence, because I think it was in AE statement as well - he is just chosing to ignore it.

[Alias]

I am sure I had seen the photo of the banner - I was beginning to think I had imagined it.

Adam has been shown evidence that the police instigated the burning of the evidence, because I think it was in AE statement as well - he is just chosing to ignore it.

Can you remember where you saw that?

[lookout]

I too remember seeing the banner when they were on top of the square part of the roof.

[Adam]

I am sure I had seen the photo of the banner - I was beginning to think I had imagined it.

Adam has been shown evidence that the police instigated the burning of the evidence, because I think it was in AE statement as well - he is just chosing to ignore it.

Why would the police put a banner up. Strange thing to do. It does absolutly nothing to get Jeremy his freedom.

I have read half of AE's statement. It must be in the second half.

[grahameb]

So he did not use a police document to claim there were conversations in the house. What the hell did he use ?

He didn't even mention  about conversations within the house. Alias gave you the link remember.

[Adam]

He didn't even mention  about conversations within the house. Alias gave you the link remember.

He mentioned it in 2005. Claiming it proved his innocence.

[grahameb]

Sometimes you have given me sources. Sometimes not.

I am still waiting for the thread showing how a whole class of law students found Jeremy not guilty.

You also said lots of people testified for Jeremy in court. When I asked who, you posted a link mentioning the people who did not testify.

As it happens people did testify. Names of course provided upon request.

When I gave you the link on one occasion you proceeded to criticise the link which was in actual fact a police statement. But you still rejected it. So what is the point of giving you links. Also I asked you for a link many times but you never ever gave it to me. So again what is the point.