what new evidence?

[grahameb]

Says the man who calls other posters trolls & blinkered.

Thought you were not going to engage with me as I upset you with my belief on the case. Did ums.

Grow up Adam.

[Adam]

Well the photographs of lewd coppers is what Jeremy said and I stressed that and even added the word allegedly to make that clear. If it is true then these photographs will form part of his request for an appeal (That is if the CCRC don't do what they did with the other photographs that showed that Sheila had been moved and they ruled that police statements were stronger evidence than photographic evidence) If he doesn't then this will mean that he lied about them. But all we can do is wait. If we made any rash decisions about them, then we may look like fools after all.

If he had the pictures, why not release them on his OS, to the papers or internet ?

He released the picture of Sheilas clean feet.

[Adam]

Find it yourself it is well documented. If I find the time I may do so as I know your powers of discernment are very week.

Mmm.

Why would the police ask Jeremys permission ? It was their crime scene to do what they felt appropriate.

[grahameb]

Why would it form an appeal ?

A bizarre banner ?

Urinating away from the crime scene.

Alledged lewd positions. Were they done 20 minutes after the break in ? I doubt it.

The word desparation springs to mind.

As I said before only a fool answers a matter before he hears it. Be careful Adam. Because if it turns out to be true you may look a fool? I won't look a fool because I have an open mind on the matter. And who says your timings are right? If those bodies were moved at any time then that alone can form a basis for an appeal.

[lookout]

Then Bewes apparently panicked and rushed to the radio car trailing urine and quicky phoned for the firearms team. If his radio call for the firearms team was made immediately after he saw the "trick of light" then the story is probably true?

Grahame,I believe that it was after the sighting that Bews got the wind up and immediately sent for the TFU. He obviously got a fright with wetting himself,as it's an involuntary function that happens during fear.

[Adam]

As I said before only a fool answers a matter before he hears it. Be careful Adam. Because if it turns out to be true you may look a fool? I won't look a fool because I have an open mind on the matter. And who says your timings are right? If those bodies were moved at any time then that alone can form a basis for an appeal.

Jeremy has had three appeals.

What did Jeremy say the banner said ? Bearing in mind at the time he was being considered an innocent victim.

[grahameb]

Mmm.

Why would the police ask Jeremys permission ? It was their crime scene to do what they felt appropriate.

Not so. They did ask permission. Also if you say Jeremy requested that the evidence be destroyed then again I answer with your own question

Why would the police ask Jeremys permission ? It was their crime scene to do what they felt appropriate.

So it appears that you have just proved your own argument wrong.

[lookout]

He often shoots himself in the foot,Grahame. Give a man enough rope---------------------

[Adam]

Not so. They did ask permission. Also if you say Jeremy requested that the evidence be destroyed then again I answer with your own question  So it appears that you have just proved your own argument wrong.

Source please. I gave you Jim Shellys source saying he requested this.

'Not so'. Please elaborate on why they would ask for Jeremys permission to do something at their own crime scene.

Actually why would the police want to dispose of the carpets or other items at all ? It makes no difference to their investigation whether the carpet stays or goes. It is not theirs to dispose of & is more work for them to dispose of. It is also potential evidence.

Jeremy encouraged them & requested they did it.

[Adam]

He often shoots himself in the foot,Grahame. Give a man enough rope---------------------

I have very nice, unshot feet.

[lookout]

I have very nice, unshot feet.

What else do you like about yourself ?

[Alias]

That would be interesting if you could Alias. I'm curious myself now.

Here it is. It is the word "from" within the farm that made me think (and it is important to include it when quoting this - that is what I meant by "the Devil is in the detail").
It could be interpreted two ways, so I came to the conclusion that it was probably Jeremy they were referring to - can´t be a 100% sure though. Hope you can see what I mean.
Further, it says: 05:29 C....... <-----(not sure about this word) to persons inside house met with no response.
Seen in this context, I can only conclude it is Jeremy that is referred to.

[tyler]

Missing word is "Challenge",I believe, Alias?

[Adam]

Here it is. It is the word "from" within the farm that made me think (and it is important to include it when quoting this - that is what I meant by "the Devil is in the detail").
It could be interpreted two ways, so I came to the conclusion that it was probably Jeremy they were referring to - can´t be a 100% sure though. Hope you can see what I mean.
Further, it says: 05:29 C....... <-----(not sure about this word) to persons inside house met with no response.
Seen in this context, I can only conclude it is Jeremy that is referred to.

So this is the document which Jeremy used to claim Sheila was alive inside WHF.

Oh dear.

[Alias]

Missing word is "Challenge",I believe, Alias?

I thought so, but wasn´t sure.