what new evidence?

[lookout]

Was it not evidence enough that PC Myall,Serg.Bews along with Jeremy,,all dived behind a shrub/bush/hedge when this " trick of the light " appeared ? If it appeared like an apparition,,then it WAS unmistakeably a figure.
Then if that wasn't enough,the two bodies which had been logged as having been seen in the kitchen,eventually morphed into one.  Police need to visit Spec-Savers. Then,again,they only see what they want to see,don't they ?
Back to the figure in the window. No evidence had been produced to prove this sighting,,even though it had been entered in their pocketbooks,so that was something else which was kept from the defence. The sighting had been dismissed by Bews,as just a reflection. Myall was not requested to give evidence,,even though it was him who saw it first and had a proper look.
Bews still scarpered though ! Big girls blouse.
So can we conclude that it was the dog,Crispy,leaping about with excitement !!!

[susan]

Hello Adam you are in your humourous mood today is that how you show affection to your ladies

[Adam]

Hello Adam you are in your humourous mood today is that how you show affection to your ladies

I am very affectionate & sensitive.

[lookout]

I am very affectionate & sensitive.

Sensitive my eye !

[lookout]

When have I been disrespectful to Sheila ? I think she is innocent.

You're right.Sheila was innocent. It was her illness that had taken over her mind,that wasn't !
 " She knew not what she did ".

[grahameb]

No, it was my own conclusion. I can think for myself. It is my opinion, of course, and people are welcome to disagree with me. I will try to find the exact transscript tomorrow, for now, good night.

That would be interesting if you could Alias. I'm curious myself now.

[grahameb]

Think the actual quote was "Firearms team are in conversation with someone inside the farm". The big question is,did they mean "farm" or "farmhouse"? Goodnight Alias x

The context would be good.

[grahameb]

When was this training ? Half an hour after the Jeremy had annonced he was starving & cooked himself a nice brekkie ? Or after forensics, photographers & the pathologist had done their job.

The jury were well aware the police changed their minds after one month. Something they are perfectly entitled to do. The judge said they believed it was murder/suicide because they had been convincingly lead in that direction by Jeremy.

The police mistskes benefitted Jeremy. Important evidence was disposed of, upon Jeremys request according to Jim Shellys article. Jeremy was not forensically checked for one month.

How did it benefit Jeremy? He's in gaol. Also if Jim Shelly said that then he is wrong. The police requested of Jeremy if they could dispose of the stuff eg carpets etc. He gave his ok.

[grahameb]

Jeremys supporters are as bad as Jeremy. Claiming there were conversations between Sheila & the police. 

But surely they won't claim the police took photos of themselves urinating outside, putting up bizarre banners & putting the bodies of dead people in lewd positions.

Or will they ?

Well the photographs of lewd coppers is what Jeremy said and I stressed that and even added the word allegedly to make that clear. If it is true then these photographs will form part of his request for an appeal (That is if the CCRC don't do what they did with the other photographs that showed that Sheila had been moved and they ruled that police statements were stronger evidence than photographic evidence) If he doesn't then this will mean that he lied about them. But all we can do is wait. If we made any rash decisions about them, then we may look like fools after all.

[grahameb]

Was it not evidence enough that PC Myall,Serg.Bews along with Jeremy,,all dived behind a shrub/bush/hedge when this " trick of the light " appeared ? If it appeared like an apparition,,then it WAS unmistakeably a figure.
Then if that wasn't enough,the two bodies which had been logged as having been seen in the kitchen,eventually morphed into one.  Police need to visit Spec-Savers. Then,again,they only see what they want to see,don't they ?
Back to the figure in the window. No evidence had been produced to prove this sighting,,even though it had been entered in their pocketbooks,so that was something else which was kept from the defence. The sighting had been dismissed by Bews,as just a reflection. Myall was not requested to give evidence,,even though it was him who saw it first and had a proper look.
Bews still scarpered though ! Big girls blouse.
So can we conclude that it was the dog,Crispy,leaping about with excitement !!!

Then Bewes apparently panicked and rushed to the radio car trailing urine and quicky phoned for the firearms team. If his radio call for the firearms team was made immediately after he saw the "trick of light" then the story is probably true?

[grahameb]

I am very affectionate & sensitive.

Except when it comes to other people's feelings and respect for other people.

[Adam]

How did it benefit Jeremy? He's in gaol. Also if Jim Shelly said that then he is wrong. The police requested of Jeremy if they could dispose of the stuff eg carpets etc. He gave his ok.

He is in jail because the police, jury, COA & CCRC think he's guilty.

Please provide the source/link that Jim Shelly is wrong. Or is it just you're opinion.

[Adam]

Except when it comes to other people's feelings and respect for other people.

Says the man who calls other posters trolls & blinkered.

Thought you were not going to engage with me as I upset you with my belief on the case. Did ums.

[Adam]

Well the photographs of lewd coppers is what Jeremy said and I stressed that and even added the word allegedly to make that clear. If it is true then these photographs will form part of his request for an appeal (That is if the CCRC don't do what they did with the other photographs that showed that Sheila had been moved and they ruled that police statements were stronger evidence than photographic evidence) If he doesn't then this will mean that he lied about them. But all we can do is wait. If we made any rash decisions about them, then we may look like fools after all.

Why would it form an appeal ?

A bizarre banner ?

Urinating away from the crime scene.

Alledged lewd positions. Were they done 20 minutes after the break in ? I doubt it.

The word desparation springs to mind.

[grahameb]

He is in jail because the police, jury, COA & CCRC think he's guilty.

Please provide the source/link that Jim Shelly is wrong. Or is it just you're opinion.

Find it yourself it is well documented. If I find the time I may do so as I know your powers of discernment are very week.