Did Jeremy hate June ?

[maggie]

There was no bonding,and it's ironic that Jeremy tells a story of sitting round the kitchen table that last evening with Jeremy looking on,when I suggest to you problems had never been discussed this way in the past. The adoption issue may have made it harder for them to overcome the intimate strangers phenomenon,but there's nothing to suggest to me that Jeremy ever missed his family emotionally after they were gone,whether you believe him guilty or not.

How do you know? You use adoption as an excuse to claim there was no bonding, you are showing your lack of understanding and prejudice about adoption as many people do.

[Adam]

She said it to a newspaper and I read it personally. She was not called to the court of appeal because the judge ruled that she should not be called. Much to the dismay of the defence counsel. So they were not able to cross examine her as they wished. Justice or injustice?

A newspaper that you read. Mmmm. Strange thing for her to alledgedly say.

Oh yes, those pesky courts again.

[Jan]

Who did she say that to ? The courts ? Oh I forgot she was not called to give evidence at the appeal.

She was not jilted. Already discussed. If she was she would not dare perjure herself in such a serious trial for such a trivial reason. She was a 20 year old collage student & would not have had the courage anyway.

Adam you have also chosen to ignore the evidence that she did not tell the whole truth about her visit to the bank reference the fraud . You have seen that evidence and have chosen to ignore it.

[grahameb]

Who did she say that to ? The courts ? Oh I forgot she was not called to give evidence at the appeal.

She was not jilted. Already discussed. If she was she would not dare perjure herself in such a serious trial for such a trivial reason. She was a 20 year old collage student & would not have had the courage anyway.

In actual fact she was given a deal by the police. If she would testify against Bamber then a whole string of offenses will be forgotten. Strange how documents went missing just before they were going to be investigated. Those cops stink of corruption. First the documents concerning her deal with that corrupt newspaper the NOTW were lost and then the judge by some legal twisting of the law rules that she should not be cross examined. Justice or injustice. Judge for yourself.

[grahameb]

A newspaper that you read. Mmmm. Strange thing for her to alledgedly say.

Oh yes, those pesky courts again.

I swear on my own grave that she did say it. So now show me what Jeremy was supposed to have said against her.

[grahameb]

I swear on my own grave that she did say it. So now show me what Jeremy was supposed to have said against her.

She even went to the police to claim expenses. That is a fair indication of how she LOVED MONEY.

[Steve_uk]

Adam you have also chosen to ignore the evidence that she did not tell the whole truth about her visit to the bank reference the fraud . You have seen that evidence and have chosen to ignore it.

This matter was dealt with in the 2002 appeal and dismissed and whilst admittedly it was an odd affair it's surprising that this is the only thing the Jeremy supporters can rake up against Julie when there's a 21 page statement of hers out there.

[Jan]

Jeremy went to Amsterdam to bring Cannabis into the country after the murders.

Oh yes, the 1984 bank fraud. Committed with a friend. Money she paid back a long time before the trial.

Does anyone know exactly when she paid it back ?

you know that - I have referred you to the WS from the bank about how she went in with a police officer ( oops she told the court that did not happen)  there is a whole thread on it and you have been linked to it before, you just chose to ignore it.

[Adam]

I swear on my own grave that she did say it. So now show me what Jeremy was supposed to have said against her.

I showed you the OS. He also wrote a 2012 article blaming the relatives for trying to frame him. Already posted.

[Jan]

This matter was dealt with in the 2002 appeal and dismissed and whilst admittedly it was an odd affair it's surprising that this is the only thing the Jeremy supporters can rake up against Julie when there's a 21 page statement of hers out there.

its not the only thing - its one thing. If Adam is going to protest that she always told the truth in everything she said then I personally don't see a problem with mentioning it. To me the most chilling bit is about her WS about the night it happened and when she went to bed . Scary .

[Adam]

In actual fact she was given a deal by the police. If she would testify against Bamber then a whole string of offenses will be forgotten. Strange how documents went missing just before they were going to be investigated. Those cops stink of corruption. First the documents concerning her deal with that corrupt newspaper the NOTW were lost and then the judge by some legal twisting of the law rules that she should not be cross examined. Justice or injustice. Judge for yourself.

What string of offences ?

There was the 1984 minor bank fraud with someone else.

When had she paid the money back ?

[Adam]

its not the only thing - its one thing. If Adam is going to protest that she always told the truth in everything she said then I personally don't see a problem with mentioning it. To me the most chilling bit is about her WS about the night it happened and when she went to bed . Scary .

It was 3am. She was half asleep & never believed Jeremys rants. She said herself that she later started to realise what Jeremy may have done.

[Jan]

What string of offences ?

There was the 1984 minor bank fraud with someone else.

When had she paid the money back ?

4/10/1985 - what is the relevance of the date in your mind then ?

[Adam]

4/10/1985 - what is the relevance of the date in your mind then ?

Thanks. I like to find out new things on the case.

[maggie]

Jeremy went to Amsterdam to bring Cannabis into the country after the murders.

Oh yes, the 1984 bank fraud. Committed with a friend. Money she paid back a long time before the trial.

Does anyone know exactly when she paid it back ?

Your comment about Amsterdamn and cannabis shows your total lack of understanding of  20 somethings. Jeremy had a dreadful trauma to deal with, he smoked cannabis and no doubt a haze of it dulled his pain. He wanted to get away from the area, the press etc. Someone suggested Amsterdamn, cheap if they share one room. Dope on tap in the cafes and on the street..... made sense. Young cannabis smokers (maybe older ones too) smuggled cannabis back into this country. Its what happenned back then, rightly or wrongly. These kids were criminals in the eres of the law but it was accepted to a point. Dyou know anything about life Adam or can you just not think in a joined up way?