72 page witness statement of Ann Eaton, made to COLP on 14 / 08/ 1991

[Jane]

And then,of course,there are those that are not so concerned with his guilt or innocence but rather more concerned regarding whether he had a fair trial and if the evidence presented against him was kosher. ie: the testimony of a bitter jilted woman and a sound moderator,with an alleged blob of 'jam like' blood stuck to it,presented by his relatives who were desperate to pin the crime on him and were to benefit enormously from his conviction. Has his case been proved beyond reasonable doubt,enough to warrant a whole life term? I for one don't think so.

As you say, Tyler, innocent or guilty, it most definitely WASN'T a fair cop.

[susan]

Hello tyler yes I think Jeremy did not get a fair trial and does deserve one.  When he was sentenced he was not given a whole life term this is what really annoys me how this was issued half way through the sentence somebody pulling strings and that tells me some are terrified he will ever be released.

[grahameb]

I am afraid he will be released on a technicality. Afraid for the other relatives.

This is a discussion forum. People who believe he is guilty are allowed to express their opinions.

Me or you posting on here will make no difference when the CCRC hears the case again in a few years time.

Why, what on earth do you think he is going to do? Risk another term of imprisonment? And why are YOU afraid for them? That sounds a bit far fetched to me. I can't imagine you feeling that much for any stranger?

[grahameb]

As you say, Tyler, innocent or guilty, it most definitely WASN'T a fair cop.

No it wasn't. I can see a big pair of influencial hands working in the background. Also it is so obvious that many have taken it to hand since to (1) make up bad stories about him. (2) embellish all the original alleged evidence. (3)Doing everything in their power to continually keep him incriminating him and blacken his character in various ways in order to make him the great archetypal Moriarty ctype criminal. And for what? I keep asking myself why? Why are you getting these people who find it almost a pleasure not only to continually malign Bamber. But also those who dare to say that he is innocent? HE'S IN PRISON FOR GOD'S SAKE. The guilty party are a redundant race. They should do well to pack up and go home. Because the law says the case is won for them.

Why on earth they feel they must feign a kind of "love" and concern for the relatives I don't know? The relatives aren't concerned about any of them. Their only concern is for themselves and their own security. Their only wish is for Bamber to shut his great gob so they can have a bit of peace.
So if you guilters aren't anything to do with the "relatives", then why are you here? It doesn't make sense? But of course you do make a good puppet show I must admit.

[lookout]

Well said,Grahame. My middle name is " wary " !

[Adam]

He is serving life imprisonment yes...but that is despite the poor police investigation and not because of it.

There are lots of things which trouble me about this case.....and then I look at them as a whole and currently that still leaves me believing Jeremy to be guilty.....obviously that will not suit this forum but at least I AM reading the opinions here and thinking about them rather than just reading everything on the UK Justice Forum and believing it as factual.

I am not alone in reading both forums and they definitely have their detractors over there who believe Jeremy to be innocent and who post as such.

I did a lot of reading before joining the forum. Because I knew a forum would have two extreme views with little middle ground.

My reading of pro or anti Jeremy material, or unbiased material clearly shows Jeremy is guilty. As proved beyond reasonable doubt several times in court.

There is a mountain of forensic & circumstantial evidence. A motive, opportunity & no alibi.

There are lots of reasons Jeremy protests his innocence. His 29 years of campaigning has resulted in a few fiercely loyal supporters. But there was no cover up from the relatives, police, raid team, DPP, court, judge, CCRC, COA & Julie Mugford.

[Adam]

Why, what on earth do you think he is going to do? Risk another term of imprisonment? And why are YOU afraid for them? That sounds a bit far fetched to me. I can't imagine you feeling that much for any stranger?

The relatives said themselves they are afraid. Do not blame them.

[Adam]

Droosie  you are quite right in looking at both sides of the coin and read everything available to you,  The majority of posters on here are interested in other people's views on the case otherwise we would have no debate if we all agreed.  The onset was 4 murders and one suicide and most forensic evidence was taken away by EP but what worries me why so much of it was burnt against a Court order and the rest is held undrr PII what are EP hiding is my worry. This forensic evidence could have proved Jeremy Bamber innocent.

What hidden forensic evidence would clear him ?

[Adam]

And then,of course,there are those that are not so concerned with his guilt or innocence but rather more concerned regarding whether he had a fair trial and if the evidence presented against him was kosher. ie: the testimony of a bitter jilted woman and a sound moderator,with an alleged blob of 'jam like' blood stuck to it,presented by his relatives who were desperate to pin the crime on him and were to benefit enormously from his conviction. Has his case been proved beyond reasonable doubt,enough to warrant a whole life term? I for one don't think so.

Julie was not jilted.

Jeremy's interview transcripts says the relationship was in decline for 6 months. She hit him after he asked another woman out in front of her. After a short period of turmoil after Jeremy said he had hired Matthew Mcdonald to kill his family she would have been relieved to escape.

[Caroline]

Julie was not jilted.

Jeremy's interview transcripts says the relationship was in decline for 6 months. She hit him after he asked another woman out in front of her. After a short period of turmoil after Jeremy said he had hired Matthew Mcdonald to kill his family she would have been relieved to escape.

Yes she was.

[Adam]

Yes she was.

That is me told.

[Jane]

Julie was not jilted.

Jeremy's interview transcripts says the relationship was in decline for 6 months. She hit him after he asked another woman out in front of her. After a short period of turmoil after Jeremy said he had hired Matthew Mcdonald to kill his family she would have been relieved to escape.

Thought you said you don't twist things.

[Adam]

Thought you said you don't twist things.

It is not in Jeremys interview transcripts ?

It is not in Julies WS ?

Sorry, yes I must twist things.

[lookout]

The relatives said themselves they are afraid. Do not blame them.

Afraid my eye. If Julie was purported to have known months before,that Jeremy was allegedly going to kill everyone,,then why didn't she approach the relatives then ? How do you think that the relatives see Julie, after having kept  " this secret of hers ",,after the relatives befriending her at the time ? Did they then,,or now believe the woman ?

[Jane]

It is not in Jeremys interview transcripts ?

It is not in Julies WS ?

Sorry, yes I must twist things.

Well, let's see. If hearing your partner arranging to go out with someone else isn't being dumped, I don't know what is and it's more than possible that you won't hear the words spoken "He dumped me" from Julie's lips. So according to you, she wasn't dumped. What was it that Caroline told you? Oh yes! "Yes she was" You may NOT think you twist things. Some of us would disagree.