And then,of course,there are those that are not so concerned with his guilt or innocence but rather more concerned regarding whether he had a fair trial and if the evidence presented against him was kosher. ie: the testimony of a bitter jilted woman and a sound moderator,with an alleged blob of 'jam like' blood stuck to it,presented by his relatives who were desperate to pin the crime on him and were to benefit enormously from his conviction. Has his case been proved beyond reasonable doubt,enough to warrant a whole life term? I for one don't think so.