I will admit that there are those on both sides stuck in the same groove
Adam may have, and I'm sure has, reached his thoughts based on weighing up both sides.
It's always interesting when having given ones point of view (as I have over a few years now), that a new poster questions and challenges one line of thought, to that which appears to tally with my line of thought.
Nickos,,I think ALL our thoughts tallied first off until some of us began to realise that all wasn't well,,then we set off questioning Jeremys' insistance that he was innocent. It's what you believe,,or choose to in this case,,though it shouldn't be that way,as he either did,or he didn't,,and even that conclusion isn't right either if it was in a court of law.
Whichever way it's looked at,,it was an unfair trial in anyones books.