It's a typo in your post
. Well at least I think it is
. Check back it reads so funny.
We see SC differently. I see her as an innocent victim from the day she was born until the day she died
. I think she was a sweet sensitive soul who was misunderstood and let down by those around her

NN,,I'd go along with the latter part of your post,,but not the first part. Babies aren't victims,,that's entirely the wrong word. Victims aren't born,,they're created . Babies are born innocent,and dependent on lots of things,can become victims later on in life. Some become victims of their success,such as child prodigys'. To become a victim,there has to be a trauma of sorts in their life,to which they're aware of. Parents splitting up,,bullying,,inner fears,,medical problems.
A genetic predisposition can already be there when a child is born,,but this may,or may not show itself until early childhood,late teens and later,,nobody knows. Dependent on the genetic make-up as to what lies dormant,,or what sparks an " illness " off in the dormant gene,,sets out a pattern of events for the future.
It's exactly the same for the cancer gene,,which is there,and may be there for a good few years until an injury to the body " wakes it up " and aggravates. I've known two people who led extremely healthy lives,,very good lives in fact,,but sadly ( separate incidents ) when they tripped and fell,,it wakened the dormant cancer cells,,which previously they'd had no symptoms,,so by that time,the cancer had spread,unknowingly.
What I'm saying is that a childs' background,,maybe through the genetic chain,,can be disturbed and bring out the hidden gene,,anywhere in the body,,but mainly the mind in a child,,but given the right environment,that gene would remain inactive.
God,it's hard to explain by writing,but I know what I;m on about,,which is just as well really,I suppose.