As for the bible,it proves nothing if Sheila's bloodied palm print was on it. It could have got there in a number of ways...
Steve. You are conceding that the print is not from Jeremy and is from Sheila - just thought I would point that out. Steve, regarding the number of ways you suggest how Sheila's print (or whoever's print it actually is) could have gotten on to the bible...
Don't you think it should have been for a jury to decide? Why should it be you 28 years after the fact, who casually decides that the print got there via some kind of innocent transferance?