No one has come to any conclusion we are simply following an idea, one which if you seem to be dismissing far too easily. I'd rather be wrong than allow an innocent man to stay incarcerated. I've been wrong many times and it not matter, it would be nice to be right and it make a difference!! (I just thought of that - it's almost profound!!
)
Did I say anything about whether or not you or anyone else had reached a conclusion?
Much like NN you have a tendency to make assumptions about what I think. I haven't dismissed it, I just haven't accepted it for reasons I've already explained, there is a difference. It is currently in the wait and see box.
As it stands at the moment, because of the evidence of Hammersley and Vanezis, the least likely person to whom the palm print (if that's what it is) belongs is Sheila. Of the other 3 possibilities I actually favour June, but I'm getting ready to wholeheartedly congratulate you if it turns out to be JBs.
How come none of you have yet suggested that she made the palm print before she ritually washed herself?