Author Topic: How to combat "bias" in chosen, trial judges - Mike Tesko's law...  (Read 4504 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
How to combat "bias" in chosen trial judges - Mike Tesko's law...

Two judges are required at each trial by jury - one whose views are in favour of guilt, a second judge in favour of innocence...
« Last Edit: May 06, 2013, 10:21:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
How to combat "bias" in chosen, trial judges - Mike Tesko's law...

Two judges are required at each trial by jury - one whose views are in favour of guilt, a second judge in favour of innocence...

Until my law is introduced, and applied, there will always be potential miscarriages of justice, because the CPS / DPP can manipulate which judges a case is tried in front of, thus effecting the outcome of trials, and appeals - it is a fact that certain judges are known to favour prosecution arguments, it's a bit like our forum, where we have the views of each side, them versus us, us versus them...
« Last Edit: May 06, 2013, 10:13:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
It can be a case of "Pot luck" how a trial pans out, and who gets convicted or not, there's nothing fair about certain trials, it's like a game, where cases are manipulated, depending on the views of a particular judge, none of them are impartial, we need a dramatic overall of the way cases are tried in the UK, I might even be pursuaded to agree to a trail being heard by three judges, where one favours the prosecutions arguments, another the defence arguments, and a third who's job it is, to be impartial...
« Last Edit: May 06, 2013, 10:26:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
It can be a case of "Pot luck" how a trial pans out, and who gets convicted or not, there's nothing fair about certain trials, it's like a game, where cases are manipulated, depending on the views of a particular judge, none of them are impartial, we need a dramatic overall of the way cases are tried in the UK, I might even be pursuaded to agree to a trail being heard by three judges, where one favours the prosecutions arguments, another the defence arguments, and a third who's job it is to be impartial...

I have been there, I have witnessed this bias, I have suffered as a result of this bias, things need to dramatically change, so that no-one can ever complain, that they did not receive a fair trial - lets eliminate appeals, let trials be fair...

That is all I ask for, before I leave this earthly, existence...
« Last Edit: May 06, 2013, 10:22:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Mike,,a lot has to do with the fact as to whether you're " liked " or not too,,,as an instant dislike or a clash of personalities doesn't go down too well.
This shouldn't come into it,,,but it does. Biased one way or the other before anyone has uttered a word.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
It is just a dream of mine, that each and every person who elects to stand trial, should at the time of such a trial, never be in fear that they did not receive a fair hearing, and that all the interpretations of the evidence were argued, or mentioned to a jury, who reached a verdict...

Is that / this too much to ask for - Mike Tesko's Law, cut out the bias in these criminal trials, cut down the costs of appealss to the public purse, let every accussed person or individual know that whatever the outcome, they did receive a fair trial, no matter what...
« Last Edit: May 06, 2013, 10:31:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Mike,,a lot has to do with the fact as to whether you're " liked " or not too,,,as an instant dislike or a clash of personalities doesn't go down too well.
This shouldn't come into it,,,but it does. Biased one way or the other before anyone has uttered a word.


This I know indirectly from Sir John Globe. ( nudge nudge-wink wink )

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Mike,,a lot has to do with the fact as to whether you're " liked " or not too,,,as an instant dislike or a clash of personalities doesn't go down too well.
This shouldn't come into it,,,but it does. Biased one way or the other before anyone has uttered a word.

I agree, Bias in trials is unforgiveable, if it is not...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

jim ignatowski

  • Guest

This I know indirectly from Sir John Globe. ( nudge nudge-wink wink )
Hi Lookout
Do you mean Sir Henry Globe?
Jim

jim ignatowski

  • Guest
Until my law is introduced, and applied, there will always be potential miscarriages of justice, because the CPS / DPP can manipulate which judges a case is tried in front of, thus effecting the outcome of trials, and appeals - it is a fact that certain judges are known to favour prosecution arguments, it's a bit like our forum, where we have the views of each side, them versus us, us versus them...
Hi Mike
The CPS/DPP cannot manipulate which Judge hears a case
It is utter bollocks to suggest otherwise
Jim

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Hi Mike
The CPS/DPP cannot manipulate which Judge hears a case
It is utter bollocks to suggest otherwise
Jim

Of course they can, its to do with listing the case, stop trying to tell me, what Michael Mansfield, said to me, happens, they simply list cases to be heard when they know certain judgges are, or will be available...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Of course they can, its to do with listing the case, stop trying to tell me, what Michael Mansfield, said to me, happens, they simply list cases to be heard when they know certain judgges are, or will be available...

Trials, and appeals are listed for specific time duration, and when a case is listed for hearing, this can be manipulated to fall at the right time...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

jim ignatowski

  • Guest
Trials, and appeals are listed for specific time duration, and when a case is listed for hearing, this can be manipulated to fall at the right time...
Hi Mike
Who manipulates the system?
Are you seriously suggesting that the CPS/DPP can arrange which judge hears a particular case?
Jim

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Hi Lookout
Do you mean Sir Henry Globe?
Jim

Is it Henry John,Jim.?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Is it Henry John,Jim.?


Yes,,that's the man.