Statement of Ann Eaton 8th - 13th September 1985

[Caroline R]

Caz 

 

[Steve_uk]

http://www.nice.org.uk/TA059

[Lugg]

Sorry Steve-uk. I'm only playing with your emotions. I've just taken you to the edge of your patience.

[Caroline R]

http://www.nice.org.uk/TA059

And there was me thinking you had posted something 'nice' - however, she still didn't have ECT, it was June.

[Lugg]

And there was me thinking you had posted something 'nice' - however, she still didn't have ECT, it was June.

Why is it I keep wanting to correct you?.....ETC.

[maggie]

http://www.nice.org.uk/TA059

ECT would only be tried for severe and long term catatonia or mania these are symptoms of schizophrenia it is true but as you have repeatedly told us yourself, Sheila was not in long term mania or catatonia. 

[Caroline R]

Why is it I keep wanting to correct you?.....ETC.

Ha, ha!! Thanks Lugg, I always do that, I type too fast and don't reread until after I post it - often I have to modify to make it legible 

[Caroline R]

Ha, ha!! Thanks Lugg, I always do that, I type too fast and don't reread until after I post it - often I have to modify to make it legible 

Ignore the above - Gottcha now -I think I'm losing my mind, it's been a long day!! 

[Lugg]

Ignore the above - Gottcha now -I think I'm losing my mind, it's been a long day!! 

[Alias]

Lugg you have no thoughts whatsoever in your stupid,ugly head. You're the kind of Year 11 pupil who will start the low humming on a teacher entering the class and then pretend that it's nothing at all to do with them. You do no schoolwork that final year of your life and manage a handful of low-grade qualifications whilst forever and a day blaming the teachers who taught you whilst you rot in the cesspit of your own making.

Talk about olive branch.  But why am I not surprised? Lugg needs an apology!!!
I can see that it must be stressful to basically be challenged for every single post you make, Steve, I appreciate that, but in no way is it acceptable to attack other members on such a personal level. Go after the posts, not the posters.
And don´t forget that this is a pro-Bamber board, you yourself have chosen to post here, no one is forcing you.

[lookout]

It's used as embalming fluid isn't it?

Formaldehyde is used in embalming,Maggie.

[Caroline R]

Talk about olive branch.  But why am I not surprised? Lugg needs an apology!!!
I can see that it must be stressful to basically be challenged for every single post you make, Steve, I appreciate that, but in no way is it acceptable to attack other members on such a personal level. Go after the posts, not the posters.
And don´t forget that this is a pro-Bamber board, you yourself have chosen to post here, no one is forcing you.

I think Steve enjoys the challenges Alias and expects them. I think however, that the attention he enjoys has perhaps created a monster and someone's boots are getting a tad too big. It was uncalled for but I have seen Steve apologise in the past so we can only hope that after time to think about things, he does the right thing!

[lookout]

I'm sure Steve will see the error of his ways,,,as he isn't afraid to apologise. I have my own reasons for " treading carefully " with issues involving Steve. It's a sixth sense that I have. I could well be wrong,,but I don't think so.
I don't mean to be patronising/condescending towards Steve,BTW. I either like a person,or I don't,,,and I don't get any bad vibes from him.

[ngb1066]

As for the whole Steve/NGB thing, I think Steve has the right to pull NGB up on things he isn't happy that have been posted and vice versa. There are times I do wish NGB was a little more careful with what he accuses people in this case of, he is close to the defence so you'd think his words on the internet would be a little more thought out. IMO.

I agreew, it was careless.

Mat

I accept that Steve has the same right any other member has to challenge anything I say, and I have no objection to robust challenge.  However I do object to being attacked personally for expressing my views, being called dishonourable for suggesting what most objective students of this case would readily accept.

I am very careful about making accusations here and my contributions are always carefully considered before I post them.  I am conscious of the need for great care in discussing family members in particular, and other witnesses in the trial still living.  Because I have had some involvement with the defence I also have to be careful not to reveal confidential information.   There is an element of pots and kettles here Mat.  You have in the past posted confidential information you have claimed to obtain through your employment, including in relation to the CCRC decision and the medical records of two members of this forum.  You have also personally attacked forum members in posts both here and elsewhere.  I suggest that you might be a bit more careful in your own posts.

[ngb1066]

Lugg you have no thoughts whatsoever in your stupid,ugly head. You're the kind of Year 11 pupil who will start the low humming on a teacher entering the class and then pretend that it's nothing at all to do with them. You do no schoolwork that final year of your life and manage a handful of low-grade qualifications whilst forever and a day blaming the teachers who taught you whilst you rot in the cesspit of your own making.

Steve_UK - that is a truly appalling post and completely unjustified.  It does you no credit whatsoever.  I hope you reconsider and have the decency to withdraw it and apologise unreservedly to Lugg.