0 Members and 31 Guests are viewing this topic.
How many people/men have you been with who keep talking about killing his family? For a year - with detailed plans of poisoning and arson.I sure haven´t been with anyone doing that, not even close!
Hmm...Interesting point. It is irrelevant because if it was not Julie it would have been Anji Greaves? That is rather a strange judgment upon Anji Greaves isn't it. The plain facts are that it was NOT Anji Greaves. But it WAS Julie Mugford. And she looked just like a whore and I suggest that she was akin to a whore as she sold her story about her self to the press. And how could you possible know that the papers were not signed until after the verdict, when JM herself said that she could not remember when she signed it? Could not remember my arse. She sold out Jeremy to save her own skin. Plain as you ignorance is sure.
Alarm bells go off right away right there! I would risk "looking pretty stupid" if five people´s lives were at risk! ANY day. Are you kidding me! Good Lord.Lots of other things I would like to address in your post, but I think this needs to stand alone.And what exactly is so difficult to understand about "tonight's the night..it's now or never"? There is only one way to interpret that: I am going to kill my family tonight.Your posts sometimes upset me, Steve.
If that was so she must have been pretty thick not to see it all until after the event.
Thankfully none, but I think it was the fact that he went on about it for a year, did nothing about it and had an apparently normal relationship with his family otherwise, which lead her to believe he wasn't seriously contemplating doing it.
Is there any proof that he was thinking about it for a year other than what we get from JM?
It doesn´t ring plausible to me. Would you have risked "looking pretty stupid" calling the police after the 10:00 pm call, and heck, it was Steve who said police; why didn´t she call the family at least? If she was uncomfortable talking to the Bambers, she could have asked for Sheila.
Well, I disagree with Steve's assertion that looking stupid would have ever crossed her mind. I think on hearing JBs comment she just thought something along the lines of "for f*ck's sake not this again" and thought no more about it until she got the 3am call.
And then said: go back to bed---?Have to go, just so you know I am not being rude if I don´t answer. Have a nice night, all.
I can accept that Bridget but why did she stay with him? Sleep with him? amd holiday with him? Can't believe she would have done that, for a start she would surely have been terrified of him?
The point is irrelevant anyway as had it not been Julie flashing her thighs it would have been Anji Greaves.In your original submission you give the game away in the opening of your final paragraph by attempting to wash your hands of the whole of Julie's evidence and to stand above the fray. Well let me tell you: firstly it's the public school types like you who have done so much harm to Jeremy's cause in the first place by not having a clear grasp of the case as most of you have never experienced real life,your lackadaisical attitude was typical of that firm of so-called top notch lawyers who relied far too much on appearance and its intimidation effect and not enough on the bread and butter issues of character which Suzette Ford(rejected because she was French),Brett Collins(rejected because he was gay) or Freddi Immani(rejected because he was an ethnic minority immigrant) could have brought,whilst the white middle-class middle aged men had it all under their control and in their charge,didn't they?
