Bridget, thank you for your comments. Despite being on opposite sides we both clearly feel very strongly. However, you have a point in your favour that I don't. Jeremy is in prison where you feel he belongs. If I felt his sentence was just I'd be happy for him to stay there but I really do NOT believe he received a fair trial for the following reasons. Things were omitted from it that, had they been included, MAY have painted a totally different picture. Experts did get some things VERY badly wrong and there ARE discrepancies in what relatives have said, all of which MAY add up to an innocent man being in prison. I'm not certain that there is anything worse being done, by way of showing this, than was done to put him in prison in the first place, but whilst I'm taken to task for it, Steve is allowed to get away with saying THE most horrendous things about Jeremy and that seems not to matter. Could this be because he supports Jeremy's guilt.
I have absolutely no problem at all with discussions about discrepancies in statements, in fact I think it's only right that such things should be scrutinised. As to Steve, I agree, he's absolutely the worse one on here for ascribing thoughts and motives to Jeremy which he cannot possibly back up with anything other than his own opinion. If I ask myself why I don't challenge him as I have you I come up with several answers:
1) because of the crimes which I believe JB committed it doesn't raise my moral hackles.
2) you all jump all over him anyway so I don't have to.
3) I am too lazy to read Steve's flowery prose and as a consequence tend to miss much of what he says anyway.
4) sometimes I read his posts knowing how much he is going to irritate you all and smirk at the thought of you getting a taste of your own medicine (sorry!)
I'll leave you with a further thought...if you look at the final pages of Ann's statement you will see that the police spent over 34 hours taking this statement. How long did it take you to read it? Who is to know how many heartwarming memories of her relatives were left out of her statements for want of being relevant to the matter at hand.