Video footage of crime scene - taken when informant present at scene...

[mike tesko]

Video footage taken at the crime scene, as mentioned on police records and documentation, and also which the CCRC have possession of, was taken at the scene on 7th August 1985, with the bodies of the victims in different postures and positions in the bedroom and kitchen, was taken when an informant was present inside the farmhouse. The CCRC consider the content of this video footage to be so shocking and sensitive, that they refuse to let Jeremy see it, because the video footage shows Sheila's body on the bed, being abused by police officers under pretense of carrying out a training exercise that officially never took place...

No-one officially took the video footage, the body on the bed was an actress, and the people who were fooling around posing whilst they lifted the hem of her nightdress were the keystone cops...

Photographs were also taken at the same time that this video footage was being taken...

Sheila's body was on the bed, before police abused it, and moved it to the floor...

FACT...

[mike tesko]

No-one wants to have to admit to taking this footage, or the corresponding photographs which were taken, because of the pornographic nature of it, and the fact that it proves Jeremy Bamber did not stage manage his sisters body on the bedroom floor with a view to fooling police into thonking and accepting that she had taken her  own life there...

[mike tesko]

Since SOC did not take control of the scene until 10am and they never took any video footage, or crime scene photographs before 10 O'clock, the video footage and other photographs taken at the scene prior to 10 O'clock, go to the heart of whether Jeremy Bamber murdered his family, and shot Sheila on the bedroom floor, before stage managing her body to fool police into thinking she killed herself after she killed the others...

If Sheila's bodu is on the bed being abused by people calling themselves police officers, before police moved her body onto the floor, then the game is up - Bamber has to be and must be released...

[boheme]

Video footage taken at the crime scene, as mentioned on police records and documentation, and also which the CCRC have possession of, was taken at the scene on 7th August 1985, with the bodies of the victims in different postures and positions in the bedroom and kitchen, was taken when an informant was present inside the farmhouse. The CCRC consider the content of this video footage to be so shocking and sensitive, that they refuse to let Jeremy see it, because the video footage shows Sheila's body on the bed, being abused by police officers under pretense of carrying out a training exercise that officially never took place...

No-one officially took the video footage, the body on the bed was an actress, and the people who were fooling around posing whilst they lifted the hem of her nightdress were the keystone cops...

Photographs were also taken at the same time that this video footage was being taken...

Sheila's body was on the bed, before police abused it, and moved it to the floor...

FACT...

When an informant was present..... ? - who is the informant and what was he informing on - the Police conduct ?

[packagebuilder]

We all know theres many copy and edits of this Crime scene video tape!!

There was also the local Essex newspaper reporter taking photos in the house before the SOC took over.

[vidvic]

We all know theres many copy and edits of this Crime scene video tape!!

There was also the local Essex newspaper reporter taking photos in the house before the SOC took over.

I don't believe there WAS a crime scene video tape ever.

There was a video tape of crime scene photographs compiled but no video of the crime scene.

[jon]

I don't believe there WAS a crime scene video tape ever.

There was a video tape of crime scene photographs compiled but no video of the crime scene.

As this videotape been shown to the defence ?

[lookout]

As this videotape been shown to the defence ?

Silly question,Jon.?

[vidvic]

As this videotape been shown to the defence ?

If they haven't seen it they are certainly aware of it's existance and I believe Bamber would agree with exactly what I have just written.

[jon]

If they haven't seen it they are certainly aware of it's existance and I believe Bamber would agree with exactly what I have just written.

If they have not viewed it , do you believe they should be allowed to do so ?

[vidvic]

If they have not viewed it , do you believe they should be allowed to do so ?

Of course. Why not?

[jon]

Of course. Why not?

Exactly why not !!