Author Topic: Tesko files - David Boutflour, killed old lady in road traffic accident, news...  (Read 16913 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Carry on Mike. Why not.?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Carry on Mike. Why not.?

Hi Lookout, whaddaya wanna know...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Hi Lookout, whaddaya wanna know...


Anything that you're at liberty to say.

mertol22

  • Guest
I actually whole heartedly believe Jeremy when he talks about the death that David Boutflour inflicted upon this poor elderly lady, and the fact that David Boutflour shot a relative in the face. I discussed these and other things with Jeremy on visits which took place after he wrote this letter, and some of the things I learned through speaking to Jeremy about the relatives, are too sensitive to talk about, but if anyone is prepared to twist my arm up my back, I may be forced to tell all, just for the sake of completeness...
It sounds to me mike the authorities went to great length s  to ensure this was airtight at the trial of jeremy, among other things, DB got quite stroppy i recall on that half hour documentry , i dont know of any instance of jeremy using firearms to give him the upper hand in disputes, quite the opposite he would most likely get the 7 bells of s knocked out of him.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
It sounds to me mike the authorities went to great length s  to ensure this was airtight at the trial of jeremy, among other things, DB got quite stroppy i recall on that half hour documentry , i dont know of any instance of jeremy using firearms to give him the upper hand in disputes, quite the opposite he would most likely get the 7 bells of s knocked out of him.

Thank you, Mertol22...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079

Anything that you're at liberty to say.

Ok, if I said, "in breeding", what would that mean to you, in the context of this case?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48661
Ok, if I said, "in breeding", what would that mean to you, in the context of this case?


Well it wouldn't come as any surprise,Mike. Knowing what I know.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Ok, if I said, "in breeding", what would that mean to you, in the context of this case?

and so the slander begins...... All from Bamber saying that DB took her to dances.....this isn't seeking the truth, it's making things up!
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079

Well it wouldn't come as any surprise,Mike. Knowing what I know.

Well, I had several lengthy conversations with Jeremy on visits after he wrote this letter to me. You see, I was very interested in the probability that David Boutflour dated Sheila, after he married Karen. Well, what I was told absolutely blew my socks off, nobody would believe what has been going on in that neck of the woods, but "in breeding", is the key phrase - they apparently like to spread it about, amongst themselves, that is the gist of what Jeremy conveyed to me...
« Last Edit: April 16, 2013, 07:50:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Caroline R

  • Guest
and so the slander begins...... All from Bamber saying that DB took her to dances.....this isn't seeking the truth, it's making things up!

If it has nothing to do with the case I'm not interested personally but I would still like to know about the panic button. I'm beginning to feel as though I'm hounding you, if there is no evidence then please just say so. Seeking the truth and providing evidence for ones claims should surely be relevant to both sides??

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
and so the slander begins...... All from Bamber saying that DB took her to dances.....this isn't seeking the truth, it's making things up!

Be careful what you are saying, I am not making anything up, I am only reporting what Jeremy has told me, now I am within my rights to say what he told me, if you or anybody else has got a problem with what Jeremy has told me, I suggest the only way to resolve what he told me, is to get DNA tests done, to prove what Jeremy has said, to be a lie...

First of all, why are you on the defensive, before I have even begun to repeat what Jeremy has told me...

Do you know something I don't...
« Last Edit: April 16, 2013, 06:37:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Lugg

  • Guest
and so the slander begins...... All from Bamber saying that DB took her to dances.....this isn't seeking the truth, it's making things up!
It isn't slander. It's libel.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
If it has nothing to do with the case I'm not interested personally but I would still like to know about the panic button. I'm beginning to feel as though I'm hounding you, if there is no evidence then please just say so. Seeking the truth and providing evidence for ones claims should surely be relevant to both sides??

I'm really sorry Caroline, i didn't intentionally ignore your question, just got side tracked about this photo which was claimed to be a video....

I have no documents to say it was active (none of us have do) but I have read somewhere that it was mentioned at trial and is mentioned in at least one of the books. I have personally seen it and can tell you that Peter and Ann believe that Nevill was trying to get to it because of the positioning of his watch. I don't believe Peter and Ann would make up that story for the hell of it so that is why I firmly believe it was active before the murders.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline Patti

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13193
I'm really sorry Caroline, i didn't intentionally ignore your question, just got side tracked about this photo which was claimed to be a video....

I have no documents to say it was active (none of us have do) but I have read somewhere that it was mentioned at trial and is mentioned in at least one of the books. I have personally seen it and can tell you that Peter and Ann believe that Nevill was trying to get to it because of the positioning of his watch. I don't believe Peter and Ann would make up that story for the hell of it so that is why I firmly believe it was active before the murders.

Hi Vic :)

Do you mean Nevill's watch? Was this not found under the mat in front of the sink?  ;) :) :) :)

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Hi Vic :)

Do you mean Nevill's watch? Was this not found under the mat in front of the sink?  ;) :) :) :)

I can't remember where it was now, but it must be on here somewhere.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae