Author Topic: Re: Adoption Debate  (Read 23151 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #60 on: March 05, 2013, 11:51:AM »


Well Lookout hopefully you did use references when you were working as a SRN and mental health nurse!!!

Since you have no experience of 'closed' adoption either practically or theoretically what makes YOU think YOU should be listened to?  Do YOU honestly expect any poster to take YOUR comments seriously when it is quite clear that YOU have absolutely no idea what YOU are talking about.  Other posters who have no experience of adoption, which are most, state they have no experience/knowlege but no not our Lookout the authority on everything!!! Lol  ;D ;D ;D

Your comments highlighted above are sickening and disgusting.  Sheila was brought up by a mentally ill adoptive mother who had ambivalent feelings about adopting illegitimate children partly bound up with her religious fanaticism all of which she projected onto Sheila resulting in low self-esteem, under-achievement at school, inability to form stable relationships, mental illness etc, etc.  Sheila should have been removed from the Bambers in 1959 and placed with an adoptive family with a proven track record.  The Bambers should have been prevented from ever adopting again.  They were TOTALLY unsuitable and this is borne out by the sad outcomes.

You find me a psychiatirst, psychologist or social woker in the land that disagrees with the statement above?

Some of us Lookout are not taken in by outward appearances!!!





First of all,,I do not profess to be an authority on adoption at all,,,,and neither do you by the sound of things for all your " studying ".
You have to get beyond the fact that ALL children are individuals for a start,,,not accessories that have to be moulded into your beliefs or way of thinking.
Guidance into adult life is vital,,and unless that's given,then you have a recipe for disaster. This applies to ALL children.
Discipline also goes hand in hand with security,,which is another vital ingredient in the bringing up of children too,,as unless that is meted out, the end product is the feral child that you see and hear about.

I would say that this could have been Junes' failing-----------discipline. The poor woman wouldn't/didn't know how to deal with Sheilas' monstrous behaviour as a teen,,,as I would have said then that the girl was on a downward spiral.
Just because June suffered from depression didn't mean that she wasn't a good parent. She had as much right as anyone else to have children,,,contrary to what you say. Where's your sensitivity.?
What of the mothers who develop Post Natal Depression.? Should they have their babies taken away.?

Lots of mothers suffer PND,,but it doesn't mean that they're bad mothers,or in fact,going to be. It's one of those phenomenons that happen to some and not others,,but is treatable if caught early enough. In Sheilas' case,the debility was left to fester into something worse.

Sad outcomes happen in ALL families,,not just adoptive ones. What is your problem.?
If I were you,,I'd go and see a psycho-therapist and get it out of your system,,as it appears to have taken over your life. 

Lugg

  • Guest
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #61 on: March 05, 2013, 11:58:AM »
surely the whole point to this arguement is that children growing up to become dysfunctional adults is not down to genes
both JB and SC grew up to have problems and it must have come from thier upbringing
I think it is a bit more complicated than that BG and is rather dependent upon many factors. The Charles Bronson story shows this and he is by no means unique.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=mcOV2cZbKu4

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #62 on: March 05, 2013, 12:42:PM »
surely the whole point to this arguement is that children growing up to become dysfunctional adults is not down to genes
both JB and SC grew up to have problems and it must have come from thier upbringing



BG,,it's not always " faulty parents " who have dysfunctional children. When children turn into adults,,they're responsible for themselves then and it depends what they've learned along the way,from their parents.   If they choose to rebel,like Sheila did,,it has no bearing on her up-bringing,,it was HER choosing,nobody elses'. If she hadn't wanted to conform,,how can you blame the parents.? They did what they thought was best,like any other parent does.
Everyone has a choice in life,,,and you either choose to go on the straight and narrow or you don't.

 

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #63 on: March 05, 2013, 12:45:PM »




First of all,,I do not profess to be an authority on adoption at all,,,,and neither do you by the sound of things for all your " studying ".
You have to get beyond the fact that ALL children are individuals for a start,,,not accessories that have to be moulded into your beliefs or way of thinking.
Guidance into adult life is vital,,and unless that's given,then you have a recipe for disaster. This applies to ALL children.
Discipline also goes hand in hand with security,,which is another vital ingredient in the bringing up of children too,,as unless that is meted out, the end product is the feral child that you see and hear about.

I would say that this could have been Junes' failing-----------discipline. The poor woman wouldn't/didn't know how to deal with Sheilas' monstrous behaviour as a teen,,,as I would have said then that the girl was on a downward spiral.
Just because June suffered from depression didn't mean that she wasn't a good parent. She had as much right as anyone else to have children,,,contrary to what you say. Where's your sensitivity.?
What of the mothers who develop Post Natal Depression.? Should they have their babies taken away.?

Lots of mothers suffer PND,,but it doesn't mean that they're bad mothers,or in fact,going to be. It's one of those phenomenons that happen to some and not others,,but is treatable if caught early enough. In Sheilas' case,the debility was left to fester into something worse.

Sad outcomes happen in ALL families,,not just adoptive ones. What is your problem.?
If I were you,,I'd go and see a psycho-therapist and get it out of your system,,as it appears to have taken over your life.

Given that I have lived the adoption experience for some 40 odd years and will continue to do so until my dying day I rather think I have a little more experience than most.  But that is MY experience.  My ability to comment further has come from studying pyschology at degree level during the 80's and much more recently studying adoption albeit on a non-formal basis.

'Closed' adoptions from the so-called baby scoop era produced poor outcomes in many cases.  If you can find me any evidence to the contrary I am prepared to reevaluate my position.  This will need to be more than YOUR opinion Lookout.  Please put you views when your mind is ie produce the evidence.  To dismiss professional opinion is imo a waste of time debating this with you further. 

Again you make sickening comments about Sheila as highlighted above.  What exactly in YOUR opinion Lookout constituted "Sheila's monstrous behaviour as a teen"?  Imo the sole cause was having an unsuitable adoptive mother in JUNE BAMBER.

As Sheila spent much of her childhood at boarding school June did not have to concern herself with Sheila's discipline. 

Adopting a child for most adoptive mothers is a time of great joy as it was for my adoptive mother; not a time when they became clinically depressed requiring in-patient pscyhiatric care due to their decision to adopt a child.  I assume you have read Dr Ferguson's witness statement?

Yes birth mothers suffer post-natal depression but as you well know this is caused by fluctuating hormones.  June did not suffer fluctuating hormones because she did not give birth to Sheila.

I have much empathy for the plight of others but I am afraid I have very very little for June Bamber who I see as a selfish hypocrite.

Your personal comments show you in your true colours.  I will not lower myself to trading personal comments, bordering on insults, it's not the way I was brought up Lookout.  I'm happy to debate the issues and have a bit of playful banter but I will not be drawn into personal comments/insults. 

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #64 on: March 05, 2013, 12:51:PM »
surely the whole point to this arguement is that children growing up to become dysfunctional adults is not down to genes
both JB and SC grew up to have problems and it must have come from thier upbringing

BG it is obvious to most that if you take the following scenario it is of course down to something in the environment.  Only a fool would think otherwise:

June Bamber - mental illness *1959 and 1983 requiring in-patient psychiatric care

Sheila Caffell - mental illness 1983 and 1985 requiring in-patient psychiatric care

Jeremy Bamber - convicted of murdering 5 members of his adoptive family 1986

No genetic component!!!

*specifically due to her decision to adopt Sheila.

Offline big-goolies

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 619
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #65 on: March 05, 2013, 01:47:PM »
I think it is a bit more complicated than that BG and is rather dependent upon many factors. The Charles Bronson story shows this and he is by no means unique.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=endscreen&NR=1&v=mcOV2cZbKu4

 
i'm not claiming to know the dynamics of this but as JB and SC didnt come from the same gene pool then thier dysfunctionality must have come from elsewhere. 
 
i'm guessing that as both were sent away to boarding schools and then learnt they were adopted , maybe they thought they weren't wanted by loving parents.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #66 on: March 05, 2013, 01:58:PM »
Given that I have lived the adoption experience for some 40 odd years and will continue to do so until my dying day I rather think I have a little more experience than most.  But that is MY experience.  My ability to comment further has come from studying pyschology at degree level during the 80's and much more recently studying adoption albeit on a non-formal basis.

'Closed' adoptions from the so-called baby scoop era produced poor outcomes in many cases.  If you can find me any evidence to the contrary I am prepared to reevaluate my position.  This will need to be more than YOUR opinion Lookout.  Please put you views when your mind is ie produce the evidence.  To dismiss professional opinion is imo a waste of time debating this with you further. 

Again you make sickening comments about Sheila as highlighted above.  What exactly in YOUR opinion Lookout constituted "Sheila's monstrous behaviour as a teen"?  Imo the sole cause was having an unsuitable adoptive mother in JUNE BAMBER.

As Sheila spent much of her childhood at boarding school June did not have to concern herself with Sheila's discipline. 

Adopting a child for most adoptive mothers is a time of great joy as it was for my adoptive mother; not a time when they became clinically depressed requiring in-patient pscyhiatric care due to their decision to adopt a child.  I assume you have read Dr Ferguson's witness statement?

Yes birth mothers suffer post-natal depression but as you well know this is caused by fluctuating hormones.  June did not suffer fluctuating hormones because she did not give birth to Sheila.

I have much empathy for the plight of others but I am afraid I have very very little for June Bamber who I see as a selfish hypocrite.

Your personal comments show you in your true colours.  I will not lower myself to trading personal comments, bordering on insults, it's not the way I was brought up Lookout.  I'm happy to debate the issues and have a bit of playful banter but I will not be drawn into personal comments/insults.





My guess is that June would have suffered hormonal problems after she reached puberty,,,and not knowing her background,I can't comment on her well-being during her 37 years,,nor the time of cessation which in itself can produce unwanted symptoms.

Studying is never the same as practical experience. This is why I don't follow books,,apart from when I did my exams many years ago. In between college I was also thrown feet first onto wards at 16 years of age,,,and from then on,look upon my many experiences as a privilege. I became more " hands-on " in all aspects of nursing,,as that was the way of learning back in the 50's. You learned as you went along,,which was much better than referring to books,,,as each patient was an individual and were treated as such,,and not clumped together with the same illness, as reactions,etc were different to medications and treatments in each individual. " One mans meat is another mans poison ". Trial and error. Much the same as bringing up children.

However,,my thanks should go to the matron at the time for her help and wisdom in giving me the ability to be able to study people and point out the strict discipline that was necessary in dealing with certain patients.
 Yes,,Sheila did behave monstrously towards her mother,,and it wasn't fair. I think June was very tolerant,,as she must have been shocked at the way her daughter turned out. Difficult at school,,,difficult out of school and nobody to turn to as the family would have been horrified at having to admit to anyone that they were having difficulties with their daughter.  I can both sympathise and empathise with June for having been in that situation,,where things like illness,especially of the mental kind,were unspoken.
I can't think of what else Sheila wanted,,as she was more privileged than others and didn't go short of anything. You're going to say " ah,but she did,,,,,,love ". That isn't always the answer either when you're dealing with someone who doesn't return it,,and you'd feel so let down.
Junes' " crutch " was her church,,,better than turning to drink like some mothers do,,to blot something out,,except that problems don't go away until they're solved,,,though in Sheilas' case they were only beginning. 

It's easy to love a baby/toddler/child. It's a natural feeling which June would have shown initially,until alien behaviour showed itself,,,,and none of us could even begin to imagine what June endured.
The poor woman would have been too ashamed to tell anyone. Whether Junes' sister ever knew,we don't know,,,but whatever June did for Sheila,it would have been out of love in Junes mind,,without necessarily showing it. You don't have to " smother " your children to show you care. The very act of caring,,is love enough. If you have to keep repeating " I love you " to your children,,,there's some insecurity there along the way. A child automatically senses love the minute it is born,,and as it grows up,,and regardless of the childs' beginnings,,,as long as it's nurtured,fed and clothed,,,there shouldn't be any issues. 
However,everyone's different,,thank the Lord. No clones in my family, only clowns,,,they've all gone their different ways,,,used different methods in bringing up their own children,,,and that's fine by me.
Poor Sheila didn't have that chance.  You have to remain thankful and grateful for what you've got and keep your mind well occupied,,and travel too,as it also broadens your outlook on life. 

My comments,,as you say,,,were reciprocated by your own.! You must accept " insults " back, as long as you're dishing them out in the first place. I think you forget what you say.!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #67 on: March 05, 2013, 02:00:PM »
There's another old saying-------------------"-Don't try and tell your grannie how to suck eggs".

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #68 on: March 05, 2013, 02:12:PM »




My guess is that June would have suffered hormonal problems after she reached puberty,,,and not knowing her background,I can't comment on her well-being during her 37 years,,nor the time of cessation which in itself can produce unwanted symptoms.

Studying is never the same as practical experience. This is why I don't follow books,,apart from when I did my exams many years ago. In between college I was also thrown feet first onto wards at 16 years of age,,,and from then on,look upon my many experiences as a privilege. I became more " hands-on " in all aspects of nursing,,as that was the way of learning back in the 50's. You learned as you went along,,which was much better than referring to books,,,as each patient was an individual and were treated as such,,and not clumped together with the same illness, as reactions,etc were different to medications and treatments in each individual. " One mans meat is another mans poison ". Trial and error. Much the same as bringing up children.

However,,my thanks should go to the matron at the time for her help and wisdom in giving me the ability to be able to study people and point out the strict discipline that was necessary in dealing with certain patients.
 Yes,,Sheila did behave monstrously towards her mother,,and it wasn't fair. I think June was very tolerant,,as she must have been shocked at the way her daughter turned out. Difficult at school,,,difficult out of school and nobody to turn to as the family would have been horrified at having to admit to anyone that they were having difficulties with their daughter.  I can both sympathise and empathise with June for having been in that situation,,where things like illness,especially of the mental kind,were unspoken.
I can't think of what else Sheila wanted,,as she was more privileged than others and didn't go short of anything. You're going to say " ah,but she did,,,,,,love ". That isn't always the answer either when you're dealing with someone who doesn't return it,,and you'd feel so let down.
Junes' " crutch " was her church,,,better than turning to drink like some mothers do,,to blot something out,,except that problems don't go away until they're solved,,,though in Sheilas' case they were only beginning. 

It's easy to love a baby/toddler/child. It's a natural feeling which June would have shown initially,until alien behaviour showed itself,,,,and none of us could even begin to imagine what June endured.
The poor woman would have been too ashamed to tell anyone. Whether Junes' sister ever knew,we don't know,,,but whatever June did for Sheila,it would have been out of love in Junes mind,,without necessarily showing it. You don't have to " smother " your children to show you care. The very act of caring,,is love enough. If you have to keep repeating " I love you " to your children,,,there's some insecurity there along the way. A child automatically senses love the minute it is born,,and as it grows up,,and regardless of the childs' beginnings,,,as long as it's nurtured,fed and clothed,,,there shouldn't be any issues. 
However,everyone's different,,thank the Lord. No clones in my family, only clowns,,,they've all gone their different ways,,,used different methods in bringing up their own children,,,and that's fine by me.
Poor Sheila didn't have that chance.  You have to remain thankful and grateful for what you've got and keep your mind well occupied,,and travel too,as it also broadens your outlook on life. 

My comments,,as you say,,,were reciprocated by your own.! You must accept " insults " back, as long as you're dishing them out in the first place. I think you forget what you say.!

You're back for more  ;D ;D ;D

Perhaps posters would like an informed view of adoption from Dr Nancy Verrier a psychotherapist  specialising in adoption who also happens to be both an adoptive and birth mother:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cI0M0w_cLT4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TT8arjSziKk

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roBa1YBdEC4

Hahaha Lookout I bet you're beginning to wish you could copy 'n' paste ;D ;D ;D
« Last Edit: March 05, 2013, 02:13:PM by Naughty Nun »

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #69 on: March 05, 2013, 02:51:PM »
I've told you,NN,,I don't use quotes/links from others,,,as I've no need to.! Even if I could copy and paste,,or even be bothered to learn,,,I still wouldn't quote from anyone.
It's a pity you feel the need to  to do so in order to " prove " your point.. I also pity you for finding it hilarious.? How old did you say you were.?

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #70 on: March 05, 2013, 02:56:PM »




My guess is that June would have suffered hormonal problems after she reached puberty,,,and not knowing her background,I can't comment on her well-being during her 37 years,,nor the time of cessation which in itself can produce unwanted symptoms.

Studying is never the same as practical experience. This is why I don't follow books,,apart from when I did my exams many years ago. In between college I was also thrown feet first onto wards at 16 years of age,,,and from then on,look upon my many experiences as a privilege. I became more " hands-on " in all aspects of nursing,,as that was the way of learning back in the 50's. You learned as you went along,,which was much better than referring to books,,,as each patient was an individual and were treated as such,,and not clumped together with the same illness, as reactions,etc were different to medications and treatments in each individual. " One mans meat is another mans poison ". Trial and error. Much the same as bringing up children.

However,,my thanks should go to the matron at the time for her help and wisdom in giving me the ability to be able to study people and point out the strict discipline that was necessary in dealing with certain patients.
 Yes,,Sheila did behave monstrously towards her mother,,and it wasn't fair. I think June was very tolerant,,as she must have been shocked at the way her daughter turned out. Difficult at school,,,difficult out of school and nobody to turn to as the family would have been horrified at having to admit to anyone that they were having difficulties with their daughter.  I can both sympathise and empathise with June for having been in that situation,,where things like illness,especially of the mental kind,were unspoken.
I can't think of what else Sheila wanted,,as she was more privileged than others and didn't go short of anything. You're going to say " ah,but she did,,,,,,love ". That isn't always the answer either when you're dealing with someone who doesn't return it,,and you'd feel so let down.
Junes' " crutch " was her church,,,better than turning to drink like some mothers do,,to blot something out,,except that problems don't go away until they're solved,,,though in Sheilas' case they were only beginning. 

It's easy to love a baby/toddler/child. It's a natural feeling which June would have shown initially,until alien behaviour showed itself,,,,and none of us could even begin to imagine what June endured.
The poor woman would have been too ashamed to tell anyone. Whether Junes' sister ever knew,we don't know,,,but whatever June did for Sheila,it would have been out of love in Junes mind,,without necessarily showing it. You don't have to " smother " your children to show you care. The very act of caring,,is love enough. If you have to keep repeating " I love you " to your children,,,there's some insecurity there along the way. A child automatically senses love the minute it is born,,and as it grows up,,and regardless of the childs' beginnings,,,as long as it's nurtured,fed and clothed,,,there shouldn't be any issues. 
However,everyone's different,,thank the Lord. No clones in my family, only clowns,,,they've all gone their different ways,,,used different methods in bringing up their own children,,,and that's fine by me.
Poor Sheila didn't have that chance.  You have to remain thankful and grateful for what you've got and keep your mind well occupied,,and travel too,as it also broadens your outlook on life. 

My comments,,as you say,,,were reciprocated by your own.! You must accept " insults " back, as long as you're dishing them out in the first place. I think you forget what you say.!

You too!!!

May I remind you of one of your previous posts where you refer to boarding school and June's religious mania having an adverse affect on Sheila: 

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3456.msg136123.html#msg136123

Where's the evidence that Sheila was promiscous?  She was certainly no more promiscious than Jeremy. As far as I'm aware Sheila had sexual relationships with the farmhand, Colin and Freddie.  Do you know of others?  Sheila was certainly no more promiscous than Jeremy and I haven't seen you make any adverse comments about his sex life.  Are you so ancient that you believe in double standards?

If you want to trash Sheila in any shape or form you will find your match in me that I can assure you Lookout.

You want a 'hot' debate Lookout bring it on...

« Last Edit: March 05, 2013, 02:59:PM by Naughty Nun »

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #71 on: March 05, 2013, 02:58:PM »
I've told you,NN,,I don't use quotes/links from others,,,as I've no need to.! Even if I could copy and paste,,or even be bothered to learn,,,I still wouldn't quote from anyone.
It's a pity you feel the need to  to do so in order to " prove " your point.. I also pity you for finding it hilarious.? How old did you say you were.?

Not as old as you thankfully!!!

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #72 on: March 05, 2013, 03:20:PM »
Not as old as you thankfully!!!



Ah,,I see.  Being discriminatory goes nicely with your attitude.

You've answered a question that I didn't even have to ask.

It also suits you being disrespectful too,as it's all I expected from you.

 I'm afraid you've got an awful lot to learn,,so get stuck into your links and books on how to be a " half-decent " person.

BTW,,,good luck on reaching my age.!!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #73 on: March 05, 2013, 03:33:PM »


Ah,,I see.  Being discriminatory goes nicely with your attitude.

You've answered a question that I didn't even have to ask.

It also suits you being disrespectful too,as it's all I expected from you.

 I'm afraid you've got an awful lot to learn,,so get stuck into your links and books on how to be a " half-decent " person.

BTW,,,good luck on reaching my age.!!!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D

Yes of course...no doubt you see me as being disrespectful due to some fatal genetic flaw in the same way as you see Sheila as being promiscuous due to some fatal genetic flaw. 

Your post as follows is sick:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3456.msg136123.html#msg136123

ie "Where did Sheila get her promiscuity from?  It certainly wasn't June or Nevill".  Where is the evidence that Sheila was promiscuous?  You often accuse other posters of avoiding questions...please can you answer a simple question. 

I wouldn't want to reach your age with your mindset  ;D ;D ;D

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: Re: Adoption Debate
« Reply #74 on: March 05, 2013, 03:52:PM »
Yes of course...no doubt you see me as being disrespectful due to some fatal genetic flaw in the same way as you see Sheila as being promiscuous due to some fatal genetic flaw. 

Your post as follows is sick:

http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3456.msg136123.html#msg136123

ie "Where did Sheila get her promiscuity from?  It certainly wasn't June or Nevill".  Where is the evidence that Sheila was promiscuous?  You often accuse other posters of avoiding questions...please can you answer a simple question. 

I wouldn't want to reach your age with your mindset  ;D ;D ;D





Dear me,,you really have got it bad,,haven't you.? Promiscuity happens from goodness knows who,or why,,but it develops more in girls,,and sooner than boys,,so I would therefore say it was due to hormones,,and NOT the fact that the girl was " adopted ". 
I would call  being caught in a field with a farm-worker,promiscuous. No protection.? A pregnancy.? No regular boyfriend.? What would you call it.? Normal behaviour,I suppose.!

I've never had any complaints regarding my " mindset ",,strange,that.