Not only that / this...
But just imagine, if it was the same silencer found by Boutflour on 10th August 1985, sent to the lab' on 13th August 1985, (SBJ/1 - lab' item number 22), and or sent to the lab' on 30th August 1985. (DB/1 - lab' item number 23), it still does not explain why Essex police still had possession of another silencer by 13th September 1985, so that DS Eastwood, and DS Davidson, could fingerprint it on 13th September 1985, or why Essex police should then be in possession of the silencer (DRB/1) to enable them to send it to the lab' on 25th September 1985, to be checked for blood and fibres?
You can't send a silencer to the lab' to be checked for blood and fibres on 25th September 1985, if that same silencer has already been sent to the lab' on 30th August 1985, albeit under a deifferent exhibit reference (DB/1 - lab' item number 23), and then rely upon the blood group results obtained from the examination of it afterwards - and by the time the case comes to trial (October 1986) it is being referred to by a completely different exhibt reference (DRB/1 - lab' item number 22)?
How the hell could a jury, or a court of law, allow such evidence to be used by the prosecution, to help convict Jeremy Bamber for these murders...
It's a scandal, and brings the Criminal Justice system into disrepute - it portrays the legal system as corrupted, and all those who work and operate under its badge as criminals ( or as I might say, scumbags)...