If Sheila went to so much care to wash, re-dress etc, why no underwear? Why lay down in such a way that her nightdress was rucked up underneath her?
That doesn't fit with her laying herself out, Ophelia style.
I cannot offer an explanation at this stage as to why she was not wearing underwear when found by the police but what I will say is I don't believe her nightdress would be in such a position when or if she shot herself. I don't believe she was found "Ophelia style". Do you not find it strange that June was also photographed in this position? I find it highly unlikely that either of them would have fallen in these respective postions after being shot.
There is speculation that June managed to pull herself up by holding on to the door, then slid back down against it, presumably to topple over, or receive the final forehead shot and be pushed aside into that position.
It's the way their legs are dead straight - I dunno, there's something odd about it all.
It's odd I agree, but odd 'either way'.
If she shot herself, I can see her sitting in a 'proper' manner, legs parallel etc, but her final resting position seems rather odd that she was neither sat up (back to the bedside table, or lying down with enough room for head)
If she was murdered and placed then that's a logic reason for straight legs, but the head angle still looks questionable for someone putting a body in place.
I do wonder what the effect of recoil and impact would be on her head position, IF she lay down with just enough headroom, then pulled the trigger... maybe this would cause the awkward tilt of the head?