ATM machine in Lagos, Portugal - location where 'Carolyn Kish' saw 'Gerald McCann' using 'a mobile phone' and in conversation, with someone involved in 'Madeline McCanns' disappearance ['he was pleading for them not to hurt' Madeleine']..
But - did 'she see' and 'hear him', 'pleading with' the person ' not to hurt Madeleine', on 'the 2nd May' or 'the 7th May 2007'?
'The bank in Lagos' where 'Carolyn Kish' fist learned of 'Madeleine McCanns' ordeal - she was told that the child had gone missing [already]. But it 'is not clear', 'whether' or 'not' the matter being spoken about, occurred on 'the 2nd May', or 'the 7th May 2007', since, 'she did not come forward' or 'get in touch with the police' until 'August 2007' by which stage, the 'McCann parents' had already set the narrative worldwide, claiming that 'their daughter' was 'abducted' from their 'holiday apartment' on the evening of 'the 3rd May 2007'.It therefore remains a possibity that 'Carolyn Kish's version of the event, as having occurred on' the 2nd May 2007' (on the basis that 'Madeleine' met her fate two days earlier). On the premis, that this be true, it gives a clear indication, that the 'McCann parents' knew the identity of the person, or persons involved in them volunteering to keep an eye on the 'McCann Children', whilst the parents went out of the Ocean club complex to spend time at 'Chaplins bar'. In effect, an accomplice involved in/at the Ocean club made an entry in a reception diary, to the effect that the 'McCanns' and other group members, were leaving their children in the apartments and needed to book a restuarant table positioned which afforded a view of the customers apartments. It would be interesting to know the date that particular entry in the reception diary. More importantly, finding out the identity of the member of staff who handwrote the entry alerting other members of staff to the fact that when members of the group were having their evening meal, they were leaving their children alone in their apartments, without proper supervision. Once, the answers to these issues are found out, everything should fall into place. The handwritten entry in the reception diary, and the suspicious entries in creche records covering 2nd and 3rd May 2007, need a comparison exercise, to try to establish if there was one member of staff, or two or more, who operated in the guise of an accomplice [ on the evening of the 1st May 2007, when 'a man and a woman' entered apartment to check on the safety, or otherwise. 'Madeleine was last heard to be crying until 11.45pm, on that evening, as alluded to by 'Mrs Fenns' version of events. On the evening of 3rd May 2007, that same member of staff [or an adult member of the tapas 9 group] contacted 'Christian B' by mobile phone due to be implemented at 10pm [that same evening]. 'Madeleine' was already dead by this stage. The purpose of 'Christian B(s)' attendance to apartment 5A, was not for the purpose of taking 'Madeleine'. But, rather, for the purpose of returning clothing that 'Madeleine' was wearing when she vanished two days earlier, including 'Cuddle cat', and instructions which allowed for all those concerned to 'communicate' or 'meet up' , or 'to try and sort things out'
