The case of Madeleine McCann

[mike tesko]

'Both parents', know that 'their daughter' [Madeleine] is dead' - the way 'I now see' the 'unfolding drama', is that, 'prior' to 'the tapas 9 group' leaving the 'UK'  that, both 'David Payne' and 'Gerald McCann' believed that 'Madeleine' was going to be 'a symbolic sacrifice' in  a  'demonic offering' linked to the festivities, relating to 'Walpurgus Nacht', celebrations.

Hence, why 'Kate McCann' had a foreboding before they embarked on the holiday break to 'Portugal'..

[mike tesko]

'Jane Tanners' input regarding her passing 'Gerald McCann' and 'Jez Wilkes' on the same side of the street, and 'her' then having seen the faceless man carrying a small child in his arms walking away from the general location of the roadside door and carpark beside the 'McCann apartment' were introduced with the intention of misleading the 'PJ' and the general public at large...

[mike tesko]

'Jane Tanners' input regarding her passing 'Gerald McCann' and 'Jez Wilkes' on the same side of the street, and 'her' then having seen the faceless man carrying a small child in his arms walking away from the general location of the roadside door and carpark beside the 'McCann apartment' were introduced with the intention of misleading the 'PJ' and the general public at large...

Bearing in mind, that in 'June 2010' I visited 'the Ocean Club' and I spent a lot of time in close proximity to the 'McCann' apartment, and in the vacinity around 'block 5' [where the 'McCann apartment (5A) was situated], 'block 4', 'block 3', and 'block 6' [where my apartment (6A) was located] and that 'I walked on the pavement on either side of the street' where 'Gerald McCann' and 'Jez Wilkes' met at around '9.10pm' on 'the evening of the 3rd May 2007'. I cannot beleive that if 'Jane Tanner' had seen both men in that street, and she had walked past them both on the pavement in the vacinity of the gate which gives 'access to apartment 5A', that neither one of them saw her. Consider for one moment, 'two men on the pavement' near 'to the gate which afforded access' and 'exit' to the 'McCann' appartment', both men facing one another, with a pushchair also parked up. Each man would have an 180° view of the surounding area, depending upon where they were stood.

[Steve_uk]

I don't think many people will accept the Walpurgis Night or devil sacrifice theory or whatever you're getting at. I might at a stretch believe Gerry discovered Madeleine dead in the apartment and removed the body in the holdall, but if he did do this the McCann's have since gone to great lengths to cover up.

[mike tesko]

I don't think many people will accept the Walpurgis Night or devil sacrifice theory or whatever you're getting at. I might at a stretch believe Gerry discovered Madeleine dead in the apartment and removed the body in the holdall, but if he did do this the McCann's have since gone to great lengths to cover up.

Do not easily dismiss the suggestion that 'Madeleine' became 'a child sacrifice' on the very same night that 'she really went missing' [1st May 2007] - the 'McCann parents' both know the true circumstances behind 'the alledged abduction script' that 'they faked' from '10pm' on 'the evening' of '3rd May 2007', onward [the simple truth in the matter, was that 'Madeleine' was 'not returned to them, after the ' Walpurgus nacht', 'festivities', 'celebrations', 'sacraficial offerrings']. As far as the 'McCann parents' were 'concerned', 'Madeleine' would be in 'safe hands' when they left the 'Ocean club` [tapas restuarant] at around' 10pm' on '1st May 2007' , and' went with some of their freinds' for drinks to 'Chaplins bar'. I undersand, that on that occasion, that 'David Payne' did not go with the 'McCann' couple, and 'the others', on an extended drink binge at 'Chaplins bar' He 'returned to apartment block 5' to await the arrival of a female [Who had offerred to do a check on the 'McCann kids', during the remainder of the extended late  night revelling. In my opinion, 'David Payne' was 'present' inside' apartment '5A' between 10.30 - 11.45pm, on the evening of '1st May 2007' , which coincides with the bout(s) of persistant 'yelling' and 'crying', as observed, by 'Mrs Fenn', during the same period. I beleive that 'during that time frame' spoken about , that 'the female' who had 'volunteered to keep a check' on the 'McCann kids', was 'also present', and that 'the crying of the child', as 'observed by Mrs Fenn' came about because 'Madeleine' was being 'sexually abused' and 'tortured' inside 'the apartment' beneath 'Mrs Fenns' residence!  It seems somewhat obvious to me, that 'as a result of her treatment' at 'the hands of her attackers', that the 'ceasation of crying' at around '11.45pm', which according to 'Mrs Fenns' account, 'ceased' when 'she' (mistakenly) 'thought', that it was the 'McCann parents', who 'had returned' to the apartment ['5A'] after a short visit to 'Chaplins bar', recounting in 'her version' of events, 'accompanied by the sound of the poolside' patio door 'being slid open' at 'the apartment below'.I beleive that 'it was just as possible', for 'someone within' apartment '5A' to have 'slid open the patio door from the inside', prior to the couple with 'Madeleine' (in tow), before leaving the apartment [possibly long, long before the 'McCann parents' returned from their 'Chaplins bar' forage...

However, 'the sound of a couples voices', that 'Mrs Fenn', 'overheard' [at around 11.45pm], did 'not belong' to 'each of' the 'McCann parents', 'arriving back' from 'their visit' to 'Chaplins bar' [instead the voices ('she heard') were those of 'the male' and' female' assailents] - I strongly suspect, that what 'Mrs Fenn' witnessed throughout that `one and a half hour period`, was 'a series of' very traumatic', 'sexual assaults', and 'torture', culminating in either 'the suffocation', or 'drug inducement' sedative', and then 'the leaving of the apartment' via 'the poolside patio door', taking with them 'the body of the victim' ['Madeleine McCann']..

[mike tesko]

Making up of the story by 'David Payne' regarding 'himself having visted' and 'entered' the 'McCann apartment' at around 6.00pm on the evening of 3rd May 2007, when he 'falsely claimed' to have 'seen all three' of the 'McCann kids', 'alive' and 'well' was 'contrived to deal' with 'any scientific evidence' which 'might surface' in 'any police investigation' into 'the disappearence' that might 'implicate him in the matter'..

[mike tesko]

It seems somewhat obvious to me, that 'as a result of her treatment' at 'the hands of her attackers' that the 'ceasation of crying' at around '11.45pm', which according to 'Mrs Fenns' account, 'ceased' when 'she' (mistakenly) 'thought' that it was the 'McCann parents' who 'had returned' to the apartment ['5A'] after a short visit to 'Chaplins bar', recounting in 'her own version' of events, 'accompanied by the sound of the poolside' patio door' being slid open' at 'the apartment below'.I beleive that it was just as possible, for someone within apartment '5A' to have 'slid open the patio door from the inside', prior to the couple with 'Madeleine' in tow, 'leaving the apartment' [possibly long, long before the 'McCann parents' returned from their 'Chaplins bar' forage] ...

However, 'the sound of a couples voice(s)', that 'Mrs Fenn', 'overheard' [at around 11.45pm], did 'not belong' to 'each of' the 'McCann parents', 'arriving back' from 'their visit' to 'Chaplins bar' [instead the voices ('she heard') were 'those' of 'the male' and' female' assailents] - I strongly suspect, that what 'Mrs Fenn' witnessed throughout that `one and a half hour period`, was 'a series of', 'very traumatic', 'sexual assaults', and 'torture', culminating in either 'the suffocation', or the administering of a 'drug inducement' sedative', and then 'the leaving of the apartment' via 'the poolside patio door', 'taking with them', 'the body of the victim' ['Madeleine McCann']..

'Mrs Fenn' was adamant that 'the prolonged crying of a child' came from 'the apartment below hers' in 'block 5' [the 'McCann' apartment]. If it had been the 'McCann parents' returning 'back to their apartment' at '11.45pm' , on the evening of their 'Chaplins bar' adventure, then 'they surely would have mentioned it' as 'one recent occasion' of 'them' returning to '5A' and having heard 'Madeleine', 'crying', 'hysterically' , on 'that occasion'. But the only thing the 'McCann parents' have 'ever mentioned' regarding any 'crying episode', was 'at breakfast time on the morning of 3rd May 2007' when they claim that 'Madeleine' had 'asked her parents', why 'they had not come' to tend 'to herself' and 'Sean' when 'she' [they] was [were] crying' last 'evening' / 'night' ['evening'/'nightime' and 'morning' of '2nd /3rd', of 'May 2007'? To all intents, and purposes, 'Madeleine' never 'raised the incident any further' during 'the 3rd of May 2007' - [well, the reason for this, was because 'Madeleine went missing' two days earlier]. The parents introduced this script in order to give support to the idea that 'Madeleine' was 'alive' and well', 'throughout' the '3rd May 2007', until '9.05pm', when 'Gerald McCann' supposedly 'did a check of apartment 5A' and 'he saw her ['Madeleine'] asleep on her bed'.

Also 'bear in mind' that during the night (2nd May 2007) - morning (3rd May 2007) 'Kate McCann' had 'slept in a second bed', 'inside the childrens bedroom' on the pretense that 'Gerald McCann' had 'a bad snoring habit'. But, 'if the truth be known', the reason that 'Kate' slept 'in the kids bedroom' that night, was 'because she was extremely upset' about 'Madeleine McCanns' absence', which, by 'that stage' was 'a day long period', and that 'in their effort to get their daughter back safely', 'her husband' had spent 'a considerable amount of time chatting to the female member' of 'the Ocean Club' (staff) who 'on the previous evening' [1st May 2007] had agreed to 'check on' the 'McCann kids' back 'in apartment', '5A'. Whilst the 'McCann parents' and 'some of their freinds' were visiting 'Chaplins bar'. The 'female' who is alleged to have been 'the good samaritan' was 'non other' than 'Elizabeth Anne Pennington'..

[mike tesko]

'Mrs Fenn' was adamant that 'the prolonged crying of a child' came from 'the apartment below hers' in 'block 5' [the 'McCann' apartment]. If it had been the 'McCann parents' returning 'back to their apartment' at '11.45pm' , on the evening of their 'Chaplins bar' adventure, then 'they surely would have mentioned it' as 'one recent occasion' of 'them' returning to '5A' and having heard 'Madeleine', 'crying', 'hysterically' , on 'that occasion'. But the only thing the 'McCann parents' have 'ever mentioned' regarding any 'crying episode', was 'at breakfast time on the morning of 3rd May 2007' when they claim that 'Madeleine' had 'asked her parents', why 'they had not come' to tend 'to herself' and 'Sean' when 'she' [they] was [were] crying' last 'evening' / 'night' ['evening'/'nightime' and 'morning' of '2nd /3rd', of 'May 2007'? To all intents, and purposes, 'Madeleine' never 'raised the incident any further' during 'the 3rd of May 2007' - [well, the reason for this, was because 'Madeleine went missing' two days earlier]. The parents introduced this script in order to give support to the idea that 'Madeleine' was 'alive' and well', 'throughout' the '3rd May 2007', until '9.05pm', when 'Gerald McCann' supposedly 'did a check of apartment 5A' and 'he saw her ['Madeleine'] asleep on her bed'.

Also 'bear in mind' that during the night (2nd May 2007) - morning (3rd May 2007) 'Kate McCann' had 'slept in a second bed', 'inside the childrens bedroom' on the pretense that 'Gerald McCann' had 'a bad snoring habit'. But, 'if the truth be known', the reason that 'Kate' slept 'in the kids bedroom' that night, was 'because she was extremely upset' about 'Madeleine McCanns' absence', which, by 'that stage' was 'a day long period', and that 'in their effort to get their daughter back safely', 'her husband' had spent 'a considerable amount of time chatting to the female member' of 'the Ocean Club' (staff) who 'on the previous evening' [1st May 2007] had agreed to 'check on' the 'McCann kids' back 'in apartment', '5A'. Whilst the 'McCann parents' and 'some of their freinds' were visiting 'Chaplins bar'. The 'female' who is alleged to have been 'the good samaritan' was 'non other' than 'Elizabeth Anne Pennington'..

'Kate McCann', felt 'embarrassed' by 'her husbands', 'attitude' and 'his behaviour' towards 'Pennington'  and 'returned to the family apartment' waiting in anticipation for 'the hoped for', 'return of their daughter'.

It is 'my belief', that during the first two days [evening of 1st, to the evening of 3rd May 2007] of 'Madeleines' ordeal, that period was 'the worst experience' for 'the parents', in the entire episode, but by the evening of the 3rd May 2007,  'both were aware' that 'Madeleine' wouldn't be 'coming back to the family' because, 'she was [' is'] dead'..

[mike tesko]

I am 100% certain, that the 'McCann parents' know, that their daughter ['Madeleine] is deceased..

[mike tesko]

I am 100% certain, that the 'McCann parents' know, that their daughter ['Madeleine] is deceased..

I am hopeful, that 'Madeleine McCanns' mother, will  'crack under the convincing proof' that 'She' [`Madeleine'] , went missing, 'two days' before 'that reported' on evening of '3rd May 2007'..

[mike tesko]

I am hopeful, that 'Madeleine McCanns' mother, will  'crack under the convincing proof' that 'She' [`Madeleine'] , went missing, 'two days' before 'that reported' on evening of '3rd May 2007'..

This is because, 'Madeleine' was not present inside apartment 5A, at any time between 11.45pm, on the 1st May 2007, and 10.00pm, on the evening, of 3rd May, 10.00pm ..

[mike tesko]

This is because, 'Madeleine' was not present inside apartment 5A, at any time between 11.45pm, on the 1st May 2007, and 10.00pm, on the evening, of 3rd May, 10.00pm ..

But, 'items of clothing' , and 'a holdall' in which 'Madeleine McCanns' body / remains, were 'subsequently transported in' during 'the period of destroying items' of 'evidential value'...

[mike tesko]

I am obliged to mention, that comments allegedly made  by 'Madeleine' McCann' at breakfast time, on 'the morning of the 3rd May 2007' , were actually, what 'Madeleine told them' at 'breakfast time', on  'the morning' of the '1st May 2007'...

[mike tesko]

If it had been the 'McCann parents' returning 'back to their apartment' at '11.45pm' , on the evening of their 'Chaplins bar' adventure, then 'they surely would have mentioned it' as 'one recent occasion' of 'them' returning to '5A' and having heard 'Madeleine', 'crying', 'hysterically' , on 'the spoken of about occasion'. But the only thing the 'McCann parents' have 'ever mentioned' regarding any 'crying episode', was 'at breakfast time on the morning of 3rd May 2007' when they claim that 'Madeleine' had 'asked her parents', why 'they had not come' to tend 'to herself' and 'Sean' when 'she' [they] was [were] crying' last 'evening' / 'night' ['evening'/'nightime' and 'morning' of '2nd /3rd', of 'May 2007'? To all intents, and purposes, 'Madeleine' never 'raised the incident any further' during 'the 3rd of May 2007' - [well, the reason for this, was because 'Madeleine went missing' two days earlier]. The parents introduced this script in order to give support to the idea that 'Madeleine' was 'alive' and well', 'throughout' the '3rd May 2007', until '9.05pm', when 'Gerald McCann' supposedly 'did a check of apartment 5A' and 'he saw her ['Madeleine'] asleep on her bed'.

Also 'bear in mind' that during the night (2nd May 2007) - morning (3rd May 2007) 'Kate McCann' had 'slept in a second bed', 'inside the childrens bedroom' on the pretense that 'Gerald McCann' had 'a bad snoring habit'. But, 'if the truth be known', the reason that 'Kate' slept 'in the kids bedroom' that night, was 'because she was extremely upset' about the fact of 'Madeleine McCanns' absence', which, by 'that stage' was 'a day long period', and that 'in their effort to get their daughter back safely', 'her husband' had spent 'a considerable amount of time chatting to the female member' of 'the Ocean Club' (staff) who 'on the previous evening' [1st May 2007] had agreed to 'check on' the 'McCann kids' back 'in apartment', '5A'. Whilst the 'McCann parents' and 'some of their freinds' were visiting 'Chaplins bar'. The 'female' who is alleged to have been 'the good samaritan' was 'non other' than 'Elizabeth Anne Pennington'..

At this juncture, compare what 'Mrs Fenn', had said regarding 'a toddler crying' continuously ubetween 10.30 and 11.45pm on the late evening of the 1st May 2007, as opposed to what both parent introduced in to their script by declaring that 'Madeleine' and 'Sean' had been 'crying' on 'the evening of' the '2nd May 2007'. If both accounts were / are true, then this throws into the equasion 'the honesty' and 'integrity' of 'Mrs Fenns' version of 'events', versus the ycCann' (parents) 'version of  the events'. The 'fact' that 'Mrs Fenn' insisted 'it was only' a 'toddler crying` on the evening of 1st May 2007 (between around 10.30pm and 11.45pm), and (not) 'two different children [one a toddler' and 'the other', 'an infant', as 'allegedly recounted' to 'them' by 'Madeleine' at 'breakfast time' on 'the morning' of the '3rd May 2007'?

Everything points to 'both', 'McCann parents' having 'moved the occasion they claimed 'Madeleine' had 'complained to them' from 'a possible crying' [in a distressed manner], on the evening of `1st May 2007`, to the morning of the '3rd May 2007..

[mike tesko]

Everything points to 'both', 'McCann parents' having 'moved the occasion they claimed 'Madeleine' had 'complained to them' from 'a possible crying' [in a distressed manner], on the evening of `1st May 2007`, to the morning of the '3rd May 2007..

It is my belief, that' Madeleine' hadn't complained to her parents at all, just that the 'McCanns' introduced the incident spoken about as though it somehow proved that their daughter was still alive at breakfast time, on the morning of her alleged abduction, and to try to discredit 'Mrs Fenns account of a toddler crying persistently in the' McCann' apartment (below) for a period of one hour and 15 minutes, on evening of 1st May 2007...

Whilst ever, 'the McCanns', 'their friends', 'the [Portuguese, Uk, and German] police` continue to investigate the disappearence of 'Madeleine Mccann' as occurring between, 9.05pm and 10.00pm, on 'the evening of the 3rd May 2007', there will never be  any resolution, because 'Madeleine' was not taken from apartment 5A, by anyone, on that date, or time. As such, how can anybody be successfully 'arrested', 'prosecuted', or 'convicted' and 'sentenced', for abducting 'her' on that date, during the said 'timeframe'?

There is no solid evidence to prove that 'Madeleine McCann' was present, alive, and well, inside apartment 5A, after 11.45pm on the evening of the 1st May 2007. We only have, the word of the parents, of their colleagues, and dodgy Ocean club, employees, to rely on. What actually took place, happenned 'two days earlier', and 'involved the corporation' of a large crowd of people, who 'are 'affiliated' to, or who are persons that receive some kind of benefit in exchange, for them, or those [who come forward, or who offer / 'support the fake narrative']. Forget that 'Madeleine' went missing on '3rd May 2007' during 'the period 9.05pm' and '10.00 pm'. Since, all that 'is true', is that the ' McCanns', and 'their friends' chose that particular moment(s) in time, to report the disappearence  of 'Madeleine'..