Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 891565 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3870 on: March 14, 2019, 03:30:AM »
How many times did Jane Tanner leave the tapas bar restaurant that evening?

9.10pm, prior to dinner being served from 9.15pm..

After she had eaten her meal she returned to her apartment, to relieve O'Brien..

Well, my point is this -

If the serving of the evening meal did not commence until 9.15pm, and we are sufficiently duped into believing that five minutes beforehand that Jane Tanner had left the tapas bar (9.10pm) in search of Gerry McCan, at what stage did she return to the tapas bar restaurant prior to 9.15pm, to enable her to have eaten her own meal by 9.30pm, and the disappearance of the three couples who had all been enjoying their evening meal by that time?
« Last Edit: March 14, 2019, 05:14:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3871 on: March 14, 2019, 05:18:AM »
It doesn't make any sense, it doesn't add up, it doesn't equate, how could Jane Tanner have left the tapas bar restaurant, twice between 9.10pm and 9.30pm?

Firstly to enable her to pass Gerry McCann and Jez Wilkins talking in the street at the gated entry to apartment 5a, then see 'TANNERMAN', on her way to her own apartment, and she be back at the tapas bar restaurant in time for her dinner to be served at 9.15pm? How did she get back in time from visiting her apartment, seeing 'TANNERMAN', and passing Gerry McCann and Jez Wilkins in the street outside the gated access location of apartment 5a, if she left the tapas bar at 9.10pm like she claimed?

Additionally, where was her partner Russell O'Brien at the time all of this was supposedly going on (9.10pm - 9.15pm)?
« Last Edit: March 14, 2019, 05:25:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3872 on: March 14, 2019, 05:31:AM »
It doesn't make any sense, it doesn't add up, it doesn't equate, how could Jane Tanner have left the tapas bar restaurant, twice between 9.10pm and 9.30pm?

Firstly to enable her to pass Gerry McCann and Jez Wilkins talking in the street at the gated entry to apartment 5a, then see 'TANNERMAN', on her way to her own apartment, and she be back at the tapas bar restaurant in time for her dinner to be served at 9.15pm? How did she get back in time from visiting her apartment, seeing 'TANNERMAN', and passing Gerry McCann and Jez Wilkins in the street outside the gated access location of apartment 5a, if she left the tapas bar at 9.10pm like she claimed?

Additionally, where was her partner Russell O'Brien at the time all of this was supposedly going on (9.10pm - 9.15pm)?

Remember, didn't or doesn't Russell O'Brien claim to have left the tapas bar at about 9pm on the pretense that he went back to his apartment to check on the O'Brien / Tanner children?

Well, when did he return to the tapas bar, in time for him to leave again along with Mathew Oldfield at 9.30pm, if it is as is claimed, he missed the serving of his dinner which would have been ready and available for him by 9.15pm?
« Last Edit: March 14, 2019, 05:31:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3873 on: March 14, 2019, 05:36:AM »
Remember, didn't or doesn't Russell O'Brien claim to have left the tapas bar at about 9pm on the pretense that he went back to his apartment to check on the O'Brien / Tanner children?

Well, when did he return to the tapas bar, in time for him to leave again along with Mathew Oldfield at 9.30pm, if it is as is claimed, he missed the serving of his dinner which would have been ready and available for him by 9.15pm?

Why did the staff have to reheat or keep warm the meal that was ordered and prepared for Russell O'Brien, if he had been present at the tapas bar restaurant when dinner was served at 9.15pm?

The only explanation is that he can't have been present at the tapas bar restaurant at the time (9.15pm) dinner was being served to all the group..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3874 on: March 14, 2019, 05:38:AM »
Why did the staff have to reheat or keep warm the meal that was ordered and prepared for Russell O'Brien, if he had been present at the tapas bar restaurant when dinner was served at 9.15pm?

The only explanation is that he can't have been present at the tapas bar restaurant at the time (9.15pm) dinner was being served to all the group..

Russell O'Brien was absent from the tapas bar at the time dinner was being served to all members of the other eight so called tapas group members at 9.15pm..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3875 on: March 14, 2019, 05:43:AM »
Only one meal, in the booking, had to be reheated or kept warm - this informs us that by the time dinner was being served at 9.15pm,  that only eight of the nine group members were sat at a table and receiving their dinners by 9.15pm...

Gerry McCann
Kate McCannl
Mathew Oldfield
Rachel Mampilly
David Payne
Fiona Payne
Diane Webster
Jane Tanner

Russell O'Brien was the only person in the group missing from the restaurant when dinner was being served...
« Last Edit: March 14, 2019, 05:44:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3876 on: March 14, 2019, 05:50:AM »
Only one meal, in the booking, had to be reheated or kept warm - this informs us that by the time dinner was being served at 9.15pm,  that only eight of the nine group members were sat at a table and receiving their dinners by 9.15pm...

Gerry McCann
Kate McCannl
Mathew Oldfield
Rachel Mampilly
David Payne
Fiona Payne
Diane Webster
Jane Tanner

Russell O'Brien was the only person in the group missing from the restaurant when dinner was being served...

This fact tells us that it is very unlikely that Jane Tanner left the tapas bar restaurant area at 9.10pm, and that she did not pass Gerry McCann and Jez Wilkins who were talking adjacent to the gated access to apartment 5a, and that she did not see 'TANNERMAN' walking across the junction carrying a child, going from left to right, and that on this occasion she had gone to check on the O'Brien / Tanner children at their apartment at that time...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3877 on: March 14, 2019, 05:58:AM »
If their is any semblance of truth that Jane Tanner did temporarily leave the tapas bar restaurant area at about 9.15pm ( just before dinner was due to be served), on the proviso that she went to check why Gerry McCann was taking his time doing his so called 9pm check of apartment 5a and the safety or otherwise of the three McCann children, that upon exiting the back entrance of the Ocean Club, and upon turning left to go up the street in the direction of the McCann apartment (5a), that she saw Gerry McCann talking to Jez Wilkins in the street, and that as a result of this she did a 'U' turn and went back to the table in the restaurant, where she told Kate McCann that Gerry was late in returning because he was outside in the street talking to one of his tennis friends...
« Last Edit: March 14, 2019, 06:01:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3878 on: March 14, 2019, 06:05:AM »
If their is any semblance of truth that Jane Tanner did temporarily leave the tapas bar restaurant area at about 9.15pm ( just before dinner was due to be served), on the proviso that she went to check why Gerry McCann was taking his time doing his so called 9pm check of apartment 5a and the safety or otherwise of the three McCann children, that upon exiting the back entrance of the Ocean Club, and upon turning left to go up the street in the direction of the McCann apartment (5a), that she saw Gerry McCann talking to Jez Wilkins in the street, and that as a result of this she did a 'U' turn and went back to the table in the restaurant, where she told Kate McCann that Gerry was late in returning because he was outside in the street talking to one of his tennis friends...

Jane Tanner never walked past Gerry McCann and Jez Wilkins at all in the street, hence why neither had any recollection seeing her pass them. It therefore falls to be treated that the sighting of 'TANNERMAN' has got to be a piece of false information, it can't possibly be true..

It can't possibly be true for the following reasons...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3879 on: March 14, 2019, 06:23:AM »
Jane Tanner never walked past Gerry McCann and Jez Wilkins at all in the street, hence why neither had any recollection seeing her pass them. It therefore falls to be treated that the sighting of 'TANNERMAN' has got to be a piece of false information, it can't possibly be true..

It can't possibly be true for the following reasons...

(a) - in order for JaneTanner to have seen the imaginary 'TANNERMAN' she would have needed to pass both Gerry McCann / Jez Wilkins who were talking in the street by the gated access to apartment 5a. There is no supporting evidence that Jane Tanner passed them talking in the street as alleged. She was back at the tapas bar restaurant in time to receive dinner served at 9.15pm, and so was Gerry McCann, and six other members of the so called tapas nine group. The only absenteism at the start of dinner was of course, Russell O'Brien.

(b) - Jane Tanner's view of anyone crossing the top of the road junction (left to right) would have been severely hampered if she did an about 'U' turn, and beforehand that upon seeing Gerry and Jez talking together by the gated access to apartment 5a, they would have been in the direct line of Jane Tanners view beyond them. In fact, the only reason why any credibility/ weight that has been attached to the alleged sighting of 'TANNERMAN', was on the basis that Jane Tanner had gone past the position in the street where McCann / Wilkins were stood talking...

(c) - Jane Tanner did not walk past them, she did not see anyone carrying any child in their arms...
« Last Edit: March 14, 2019, 06:25:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3880 on: March 14, 2019, 06:28:AM »
This brings me on, to the following important question - at what time after the serving of dinner (9.15pm) did Russell O'Brien return to the tapas bar restaurant, to enable him to leave again along with Mathew Oldfield at about 9.30pm?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3881 on: March 14, 2019, 06:29:AM »
This brings me on, to the following important question - at what time after the serving of dinner (9.15pm) did Russell O'Brien return to the tapas bar restaurant, to enable him to leave again along with Mathew Oldfield at about 9.30pm?

Bearing in mind, that the restaurant staff had to reheat / keep warm his meal?
« Last Edit: March 14, 2019, 06:30:AM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3882 on: March 14, 2019, 06:33:AM »
Also bear in mind that one of the restaurant staff states that they had to re-heat a partially ate meal...

Was that partially eaten meal the one initially served to Russell O'Brien?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3883 on: March 14, 2019, 06:34:AM »
Also bear in mind that one of the restaurant staff states that they had to re-heat a partially ate meal...

Was that partially eaten meal the one initially served to Russell O'Brien?

Or, did it belong to a second member of the tapas nine group?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #3884 on: March 14, 2019, 06:43:AM »
If the partially eaten meal that got reheated / was kept warm this must have taken precedence prior to 9.30pm, because by that time the table where the three couples had been sat (along with Diane Webster and either Jane Tanner or Russell O'Brien) had been abandoned according to a member of the restaurant staff by 9.30pm..

With this in mind, everyone who had been present at the table when dinner was served must have had sufficient opportunity to eat their respective meals within the 15 minute period between when dinner had been served, and the earliest time that the table where the tapas group sat was abandoned in a hurry by 9.30pm..
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...