The case of Madeleine McCann

[mike tesko]

I don't think that Kate McCann would have gone back to the tapas bar after she discovered that 'they' had taken Maddie, and leave her other two siblings unprotected and alone. I think Jane Tanner stayed with the remaining two McCann siblings whilst Kate returned to the tapas bar to raise the false alarm..

[mike tesko]

Gerry McCann was not at the tapas bar either when Kate left there at 10pm, or when she returned to raise the alarm..

This makes it highly probable that the man seen carrying a child in his arms by the Smith contingent was in fact Gerry McCann..

[mike tesko]

A resident of an apartment on the floor above apartment 5A, on an upper floor has stated that at 10.30pm how they were alerted to the potential disappearance of Madeleine McCann by the fact that they heard a commotion at about 10.30pm on the evening of 3rd May 2007, and that they saw Gerry McCann amongst the bushes and shrubs beneath the patio of 5A, and that the witness called down to him and queried what the disturbance was all about? Only to be told by Gerry McCann that a little girl had gone missing...

Rather curiously the cadaver dogs alerted positively to an area in the front garden of 5A, suggesting that traces of cadaveric odour were deposited in the same location where Gerry McCann had been seen and spoken to, on the night of the reported disappearance, so soon after the disappearance of Maddie had been reported..

[mike tesko]

A resident of an apartment on the floor above apartment 5A, on an upper floor has stated that at 10.30pm how they were alerted to the potential disappearance of Madeleine McCann by the fact that they heard a commotion at about 10.30pm on the evening of 3rd May 2007, and that they saw Gerry McCann amongst the bushes and shrubs beneath the patio of 5A, and that the witness called down to him and queried what the disturbance was all about? Only to be told by Gerry McCann that a little girl had gone missing...

Rather curiously the cadaver dogs alerted positively to an area in the front garden of 5A, suggesting that traces of cadaveric odour were deposited in the same location where Gerry McCann had been seen and spoken to, on the night of the reported disappearance, so soon after the disappearance of Maddie had been reported..

In what circumstances could Maddie's Cardaveric odour have been transferred into the bushes of the front garden of apartment 5A after the sighting of Gerry McCann there at around 10.30pm on the evening of 3rd May 2007?

[Steve_uk]

Wasn't this the man spotted lurking in the bushes outside the apartment block? https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-nannys-new-sketch-329189

[mike tesko]

Wasn't this the man spotted lurking in the bushes outside the apartment block? https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-nannys-new-sketch-329189

Mrs Fenn wasn't mistaken, she saw and recognised Gerry McCann amongst the bushes and shrubbery on the garden of apartment 5A on the late evening of 3rd May 2007, when he told her that a little girl was missing!

Not 'his daughter', but a little girl..

[Steve_uk]

Mrs Fenn wasn't mistaken, she saw and recognised Gerry McCann amongst the bushes and shrubbery on the garden of apartment 5A on the late evening of 3rd May 2007, when he told her that a little girl was missing!

Not 'his daughter', but a little girl..

I wonder if the motive was robbery but upon seeing Madeleine he took her..http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PAMELA_FENN.htm

[mike tesko]

Mrs Fenn wasn't mistaken, she saw and recognised Gerry McCann amongst the bushes and shrubbery on the garden of apartment 5A on the late evening of 3rd May 2007, when he told her that a little girl was missing!

Not 'his daughter', but a little girl..

Sorry, I shall correct myself - Gerry McCann told Mrs Fenn that ' a little girl had been abducted' ( the time was about 10.30pm on the evening of 3rd May 2007)..

[mike tesko]

I wonder if the motive was robbery but upon seeing Madeleine he took her..http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PAMELA_FENN.htm

I don't think so..

It depends of course, which incident you are referring to, (1) - Mrs Fenns account evening 1st May 2007, (2) - Kate McCanns account evening and night of 2nd / 3rd May 2007, or (3) alerting that Maddie had been taken by 10pm of the evening 3rd May 2007?

[mike tesko]

I have recently visited a website which professes to be in existence trying to get justice for Madeleine McCann - the people who run it are control freaks and bullies..

The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann

(1) - https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t15875p50-less-than-24-hrs-earlier-the-tragedy#396797

[mike tesko]

I have recently visited a website which professes to be in existence trying to get justice for Madeleine McCann - the people who run it are control freaks and bullies..

The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann

(1) - https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t15875p50-less-than-24-hrs-earlier-the-tragedy#396797

Those that run it, or moderate it, go out of their way to try to tell it's members what evidence to base their opinions or views upon! I was repeatedly told to keep my opinions and views to the evidence which they are saying is the only evidence in the case! Can you believe it?

As I say, a website run by bullies, who purport to be in pursuit of the truth in the Madeleine McCann case, who go about their business by a reliance upon restricted evidence...

[mike tesko]

One of the morons that calls himself a moderator (Verdi) of this forum, even went so far as to accuse me of using photographs that were on Jerry McCanns blog (which I consented to him uploading from me) and that I had lied about being the person who had been to Praia de Luz and taken them!

[mike tesko]

One of the morons that calls himself a moderator (Verdi) of this forum, even went so far as to accuse me of using photographs that were on Jerry McCanns blog (which I consented to him uploading from me) and that I had lied about being the person who had been to Praia de Luz and taken them!

Any way, it has opened my eyes regarding the other people who are controlling what it's members can say on these other web forums! It appears that you can only say what these people want you to say, and you may only rely on material which they declare is actual evidence!

I have never heard such a load of absolute nonsense in all of my 63 years of life on this earth!

[mike tesko]

By all means, go to their forum and become a member - but be careful what you say, and make sure that whatever you say, is based on what they regard as the evidence!

It's a circus!

Here's the link  : -

(1) - https://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t15875p50-less-than-24-hrs-earlier-the-tragedy#396797

[mike tesko]

Controlling what people say, and forcing them to only rely upon what the owners say is the evidence, is akin to the owners being a party to team McCann...