Author Topic: The case of Madeleine McCann  (Read 891188 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2760 on: May 16, 2017, 03:38:PM »
In the UK the recognition evidence available as a result of the Smith sighting is admissible evidence capable of showing his culpability...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2761 on: May 16, 2017, 03:41:PM »
In the UK the recognition evidence available as a result of the Smith sighting is admissible evidence capable of showing his culpability...

In my opinion Gerry was certainly carrying his daughter down that street when he passed the Smiths. Yet nowhere in his official statements or script does he allude to having done such a thing at all that evening...
« Last Edit: May 16, 2017, 03:43:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2762 on: May 16, 2017, 03:46:PM »
In my opinion Gerry was certainly carrying his daughter down that street when he passed the Smiths. Yet nowhere in his official statements or script does he allude to having done such a thing at all that evening...

He only got away with being arrested in connection with Maddies disappearence because the Smiths did not come forward until four months after the event...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2763 on: May 16, 2017, 04:17:PM »
The exact whereabouts of all interested persons in this disappearence could have been mapped using geo technology - was this ever used?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21091
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2764 on: May 16, 2017, 07:38:PM »
In my opinion Gerry was certainly carrying his daughter down that street when he passed the Smiths. Yet nowhere in his official statements or script does he allude to having done such a thing at all that evening...
What are his alternatives for dumping the body in that case..

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2765 on: May 17, 2017, 09:27:AM »
In my opinion Gerry was certainly carrying his daughter down that street when he passed the Smiths. Yet nowhere in his official statements or script does he allude to having done such a thing at all that evening...





Mike,you're sorely wrong. Very wrong.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2766 on: May 17, 2017, 09:30:AM »
The McCann's crime was to have left the children unattended,it stops there. They had no involvement concerning the child's disappearance.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33773
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2767 on: May 17, 2017, 09:40:AM »
The McCann's crime was to have left the children unattended,it stops there. They had no involvement concerning the child's disappearance.

Lookout, for once you and I are in total agreement.

Offline maggie

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13651
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2768 on: May 17, 2017, 09:48:AM »




Mike,you're sorely wrong. Very wrong.
Agreed Lookout.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2769 on: May 19, 2017, 09:00:AM »




Mike,you're sorely wrong. Very wrong.

No, I am not wrong, he knows what happened to Maddie...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2770 on: May 19, 2017, 09:23:AM »
No, I am not wrong, he knows what happened to Maddie...





This time you are,Mike,sorry.
I remember so many men looking alike when sightings/descriptions were shown. You've only to look back at Murat,Symington,one of the doctors in the McCann party along with another. I think there were 4 lookalikes who could all have been brothers they were so similar.
Many people gave police a description of Murat on the night that Madeleine went missing,but look what happened. 

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2771 on: May 19, 2017, 10:00:AM »



This time you are,Mike,sorry.
I remember so many men looking alike when sightings/descriptions were shown. You've only to look back at Murat,Symington,one of the doctors in the McCann party along with another. I think there were 4 lookalikes who could all have been brothers they were so similar.
Many people gave police a description of Murat on the night that Madeleine went missing,but look what happened.


We will see who's wrong when they recover her remains from the grounds of the derelict building opposite the church were the parents sought refuge! Another thing which sticks in the mind, is that Gerry was captured on footage laughing joyfully on the patio on the first morning of Maddies disappearence! Laughing his head off...

"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48670
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2772 on: May 19, 2017, 11:01:AM »

We will see who's wrong when they recover her remains from the grounds of the derelict building opposite the church were the parents sought refuge! Another thing which sticks in the mind, is that Gerry was captured on footage laughing joyfully on the patio on the first morning of Maddies disappearence! Laughing his head off...





Well I don't know about that,but something must have triggered it,like SJ hearing JB " laugh" on the morning after the murders ? 

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2773 on: May 19, 2017, 06:11:PM »

Well I don't know about that,but something must have triggered it,like SJ hearing JB " laugh" on the morning after the murders ?

'Stan' Jones was dishonest, he tampered with the silencer evidence, he took possession of the silencer (SBJ/1) at the scene on that first morning of the police investigation. Why did SOCO allow him to remove the silencer and a further three exhibits from the crime scene when he returned to the scene late morning? He also tampered with his pocketbook entries, he rewrote the contents to hide damning evidence to the effect that he had involvement with the silencer prior to David Boutflour finding it on 10th August 1985, a copy of the front cover of his pocketbook is available for all to see, he couldn't have got away with fabricating the contents of the re-written pocketbook without knowlege of a senior officer who was responsible for issuing Jones with the replacement pocketbook in question. There is no evidence captured on video or CCTV to prove that JB laughed at all as alluded to by 'Stan' Jones, whereas, footage exists of GM laughing his head off on the patio balcony only hours after Maddies disappearence. Where is the missing holdall?
« Last Edit: May 19, 2017, 06:26:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: The case of Madeleine McCann
« Reply #2774 on: May 19, 2017, 06:37:PM »
I am more than satisfied that the Smith sighting involved GM, and he was seen carrying his daughter down in the direction of the Beach.  I'm not certain of the time referred to, or mentioned. The Smiths might have already altered their clocks or watches by the one hour difference with it being their last night in the resort! If this is what did happen, it might explain how GM could have been carrying Maddie down hill in the direction of the beach after 9pm, not after 10pm. It is very interesting to note, that Jane Tanner thought that GM had been gone an inordinate length of time from the tapas bar at the time of his 9pm check of the apartment, he didn't return to the tapas bar until around 9.30pm that evening - ample time to enable GM to carry his daughter down the hill toward the beach, conceal her body somewhere until later on and return to the tapas bar...

It would have taken him 10 minutes maximum to carry his daughter from apartment 5a down to the beach area, and slightly less than that to walk briskly back up the hill to the tapas bar, making sure he took a route which was not covered by CCTV...
« Last Edit: May 19, 2017, 06:39:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...