0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,3851.msg446131.html#msg446131
Go on. Who secretly messaged you David's old post?
When Herbert Leon Mcdonnell got back to Jeremy in 1992 concluding that Sheila was murdered. Jeremy for a while began thinking it was Anthony Pargheter that murdered the family. Here is my take 1. A guilty Jeremy would not seekout the help of Herbert Leon Mcdonnell. Who was then seen as the best bloodspatter analyst in the world. (For obvious reasons)2. A guilty Jeremy would not deviate from what he so convincingly staged. Jeremy was taken in by what was being told to him. Its worth noting that in 2009 Herbert Leon Mcdonnell recanted his 1992 conclusions and now believes it was a suicide.
Herbert Leon Mcdonnell concluded in 1992 that the large stain around Sheila's arm pit was a result of build up of blood as Sheila touched the wound on her neck. Creating a temporary build up of blood until Sheila's arm fell back. Herbert was wrong for two reasons. 1. That wound with a smear was instantly fatal. Thus Sheila could not have touched it.2. If you look closely it seems consistent with being caused by the rifle end.http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,7805.msg369805.html#msg369805Furthermore there are many variables involved. Was Sheila sitting up or standing up as this poor guy? https://gfycat.com/GloriousHeavenlyBuck -NSFL
Aha! Thanks for the confirmation, Caroline.
It came from here found the link on the old thread https://www.channel4.com/news/jeremy-bamber-new-evidence-will-set-me-free1The word COULD makes all the difference!
