Jeremy Bamber: the Prelude, the Tragedy and the Aftermath

[lookout]

 Strange how this will now be overlooked by those who saw no wrong in JM's testimony,etc.

I suppose it can be said at this stage that she has got a conscience--------of sorts,but to the detriment of her ex-husband who,I would have thought,SHOULD have been told before any marriage took place.

[sami]

Strange how this will now be overlooked by those who saw no wrong in JM's testimony,etc.

I suppose it can be said at this stage that she has got a conscience--------of sorts,but to the detriment of her ex-husband who,I would have thought,SHOULD have been told before any marriage took place.

i do find her lacking moral.any decent human being would have been to the police on day one.maybe she was happy to live the high life with jb.but come on 5 murders including 2 kids i would shop my girlfriend thats for sure.morals dictate that

[lookout]

i do find her lacking moral.any decent human being would have been to the police on day one.maybe she was happy to live the high life with jb.but come on 5 murders including 2 kids i would shop my girlfriend thats for sure.morals dictate that

This is just it,JM KNOWS that JB is innocent. You'll see.

[sami]

This is just it,JM KNOWS that JB is innocent. You'll see.

i personally wouldnt  go that far lookout.but i would say she is the lowest of human beings and a hard hearted woman i mean come on ,ready to go in whf and identify the bodies .most women would say iam not doing that.

[sami]

i know had i identifyed the bodies i would be having nightmares and flashbacks to this day. maybe iam just soft

[Caroline]

This is just it,JM KNOWS that JB is innocent. You'll see.

NO she doesn't 

[sami]

NO she doesn't 

i dont think she does her views have remained the same for 30 years not even a rumour that she has told anyone that she was lying.she could go to a country with no extradition laws with uk and claim she lied write a book and make a fortune .she hasnt

[Caroline]

i dont think she does her views have remained the same for 30 years not even a rumour that she has told anyone that she was lying.she could go to a country with no extradition laws with uk and claim she lied write a book and make a fortune .she hasnt

The hit man story could only have come from Jeremy.

[lookout]

NO she doesn't 

Oh but she does.

[lookout]

The hit man story could only have come from Jeremy.

JM knew that JB was jesting as usual,but she quickly turned it around to suit the occasion at the trial. No wonder she was in floods of tears when being questioned by Rivlin,she knew full well that what she was saying was untrue,so out came the hankie as a cover-up. Most of the time JM took no notice of Jeremy's sense of humour which she'd been well used to,but come the split and things were different.

[Caroline]

Oh but she does.

Jesting that he intended to kill his parents? They then end up murdered so he jests again the very days after saying he hired a hit man? Of course he did Lookout. She KNOWS he's guilty.

[sami]

Jesting that he intended to kill his parents? They then end up murdered so he jests again the very days after saying he hired a hit man? Of course he did Lookout. She KNOWS he's guilty.

the phrase from sherlock holmes you quoted  some posts earlier caroline .is very fitting

[lookout]

Jesting that he intended to kill his parents? They then end up murdered so he jests again the very days after saying he hired a hit man? Of course he did Lookout. She KNOWS he's guilty.

Nope. These so-called " threats " were hearsay. The hitman story had been repeated to RWB who was the keenest of the lot of them to see JB behind bars,so what better than someone of RWB's standing than to reiterrate the idea of the hitman in a meaningful manner ?
What was in JM's testimony to finally " seal the deal ",that years later her husband divorced her when she'd confessed to him that she hadn't been altogether truthful ? It was nothing to do with him having been guilty because she'd believed that he wasn't. Her crying was/is for the reason that she's purged herself.

[Jane]

Strange how this will now be overlooked by those who saw no wrong in JM's testimony,etc.

I suppose it can be said at this stage that she has got a conscience--------of sorts,but to the detriment of her ex-husband who,I would have thought,SHOULD have been told before any marriage took place.

I hadn't realized that Julie and her husband had divorced. Is this a recent thing?

[lookout]

I hadn't realized that Julie and her husband had divorced. Is this a recent thing?

I would have said that things were a bit rocky for some time after she'd confessed to her husband that her involvement in her part involving collusion that had resulted in a MOJ. It was he who'd decided to call it a day and file for divorce. I knew of the rocky relationship a couple of years ago.and did mention it on the forum,but got rebuffed.
The husband obviously doesn't like lies. He has admitted in a letter to a member that her testimony didn't hold water.