Jeremy Bamber: the Prelude, the Tragedy and the Aftermath

[lookout]

How do you know this person is telling the truth?

There are in fact two people who I know of who know and both are reliable sources as it's been checked out.  What isn't known are the facts surrounding the divorce but many things obviously remain personal,except this fact about her testimony.

[Caroline]

So far we have the word of an anonymous person and don't even know if they are actually divorced.

[Caroline]

There are in fact two people who I know of who know and both are reliable sources as it's been checked out.  What isn't known are the facts surrounding the divorce but many things obviously remain personal,except this fact about her testimony.

Like I said, so he told a complete stranger a secret which could see the mother of his kids jailed? That doesn't sound even remotely credible.

[Caroline]

When is this divorce supposed to have take place?

[lookout]

Like I said, so he told a complete stranger a secret which could see the mother of his kids jailed? That doesn't sound even remotely credible.

 Maybe his way of making her come clean. So far as I know they're not together. It was after becoming religious that JM herself confessed to her then husband of her involvement and collusion that he divorced her. The information was checked for accuracy and found to be authentic.

[sami]

 Maybe his way of making her come clean. So far as I know they're not together. It was after becoming religious that JM herself confessed to her then husband of her involvement and collusion that he divorced her. The information was checked for accuracy and found to be authentic.

by who

[Caroline]

 Maybe his way of making her come clean. So far as I know they're not together. It was after becoming religious that JM herself confessed to her then husband of her involvement and collusion that he divorced her. The information was checked for accuracy and found to be authentic.

How can it be checked out?

[lookout]

When is this divorce supposed to have take place?

I'm not sure but this info was out last year.
It came as no surprise to me because of previous news months before that I knew about,so I'd have said that the divorce was only within this last 2 or 3 years.

[Caroline]

I'm not sure but this info was out last year.
It came as no surprise to me because of previous news months before that I knew about,so I'd have said that the divorce was only within this last 2 or 3 years.

OK cheers, so how can it be verified?

[guest2181]

OK cheers, so how can it be verified?

This is clearly rubbish. May 2016 board meeting she is listed as Julie Smerchanski.
Winnipeg School Division's director of assessment.

It's public record.

[Caroline]

This is clearly rubbish. May 2016 board meeting she is listed as Julie Smerchanski.

On the basis that I am sure that Mr Smerchanski is an intelligent man, there is no way he would tell something as sensitive as this to someone from this forum or anyone else who contacted him out of the blue. It just wouldn't happen. This is something you would confide to a family member of a REALLY good friend. 

[sami]

On the basis that I am sure that Mr Smerchanski is an intelligent man, there is no way he would tell something as sensitive as this to someone from this forum or anyone else who contacted him out of the blue. It just wouldn't happen. This is something you would confide to a family member of a REALLY good friend.

i agree with that

[David1819]

This is clearly rubbish. May 2016 board meeting she is listed as Julie Smerchanski.
Winnipeg School Division's director of assessment.

It's public record.

That's if we assume she would want go back to her original sure name

[lookout]

This is clearly rubbish. May 2016 board meeting she is listed as Julie Smerchanski.
Winnipeg School Division's director of assessment.

It's public record.

Not everyone reverts back to their birth surname. Her married surname would be more recognised. There's no law that says that you have to change your name.

[lookout]

On the basis that I am sure that Mr Smerchanski is an intelligent man, there is no way he would tell something as sensitive as this to someone from this forum or anyone else who contacted him out of the blue. It just wouldn't happen. This is something you would confide to a family member of a REALLY good friend.

The man didn't " just tell " someone this information,and it was nobody from this forum.
 Why must you always question and dispute anything that sniffs of being the truth ?
I suggest you do your usual " sleuthing " and find out for yourself then it would stop the chorus of your "backers" telling me my posts are rubbish.