The Dogs

[Patti]

I'd like to see the original document.

Plus Myalls, Bews and Saxbys first statements, but I've asked for those once or twice before I think.   

Hartley I feel like a parrot, by saying this document is on her, I have seen it, but can't find it.

I'd be interested in seeing them also....I've seen note books! 

[-Harters-]

Hartley I feel like a parrot, by saying this document is on her, I have seen it, but can't find it.

I'd be interested in seeing them also....I've seen note books! 

I don't recall seeing it, I've looked but have had no joy in finding it.

I suspect that if it is on here, then it will be less than conclusive, which brings me back to people having different interpretations over things.

[Caroline R]

I'd like to see the original document.

Plus Myalls, Bews and Saxbys first statements, but I've asked for those once or twice before I think.   

It's pointless even discussing it until we can get a copy of the original document. As usual the whole thing is already being distorted. "It refers to a different day" "It probably referred to JB"  "It's not 'project' it's report". This always happens, the original point gets lost and the idea gets totally discredited. We need to find the original document (Patti say's it's here!! - I'm listening Patti :D) - we should look for it and STOP speculating!!

[Patti]

I don't recall seeing it, I've looked but have had no joy in finding it.

I suspect that if it is on here, then it will be less than conclusive, which brings me back to people having different interpretations over things.

You've seen it Hartley because I have found posts from you that makes reference to it...I think it was posted when Keira was talking about the James Fraser Bell.....I'll have another look for it later today. 

[-Harters-]

Hartley I feel like a parrot, by saying this document is on her, I have seen it, but can't find it.

I'd be interested in seeing them also....I've seen note books! 

I'm not sure I've ever had parrot, does it taste like chicken? 

[Patti]

It's pointless even discussing it until we can get a copy of the original document. As usual the whole thing is already being distorted. "It refers to a different day" "It probably referred to JB"  "It's not 'project' it's report". This always happens, the original point gets lost and the idea gets totally discredited. We need to find the original document (Patti say's it's here!! - I'm listening Patti :D) - we should look for it and STOP speculating!!

Very assertive Caroline....Love it!  :D :D :D :D :D

[-Harters-]

You've seen it Hartley because I have found posts from you that makes reference to it...I think it was posted when Keira was talking about the James Fraser Bell.....I'll have another look for it later today. 

The only posts I've referenced it are when I've quoted other people.

[Patti]

I'm not sure I've ever had parrot, does it taste like chicken? 

Squark! Its on here somewhere! Its on here somewhere! Its on here somewhere! Its on here somewhere!

I need a gockle of beer....lol  :D :D :D :D

I'm an ornithologist   

[Caroline R]

Very assertive Caroline....Love it!  :D :D :D :D :D

Well, it drives me NUTS!! Someone  say's something that might actually have some importance and IMMEDIATELY there is a barrage of posts all arguing one way or another and the original point gets lost - only to be brought up again a few months later and the whole onslaught starts again!! That's why we can't find the document!! If we find it, we need to put it in the archives area!! Sorry - just get frustrated when this happens 

[Patti]

This is part of it...I posted this my  self. Must be on a memory stick somewhere, because I had to wipe my computer clean..

[Patti]

Who was Chelmsley??



         69 ITEMS                  MAJOR INCIDENT REPORT                                      PAGE 1 OF 2

ITEM              SU                                      FO                                                AD

       1.           0345  S11 MYALL               UNIDENT MALE 0001                      WHITE HSE FM
       2.           2011  N94                         UNIDENT MALE 0029                       PAGES LN
       3.           2015  N94                         UNIDENT MALE 0038                       PAGES LN



This is all that the photograph of the report shows unfortunately.Underneath photo it says -: The beginning of the Major Incident Report in the White House Farm Case,which records that PC MYALL claimed he saw the figure of a person inside White House Farm at 03:45 whilst Bamber was stood outside the building.

[Patti]

Apparently there is a picture of this report in Lomax's book, but it is not dated.  The middle of that report is what I posted, so it does exist and I must have taken a screen shot of it, but sadly not all of it. 

[maggie]

Well, it drives me NUTS!! Someone  say's something that might actually have some importance and IMMEDIATELY there is a barrage of posts all arguing one way or another and the original point gets lost - only to be brought up again a few months later and the whole onslaught starts again!! That's why we can't find the document!! If we find it, we need to put it in the archives area!! Sorry - just get frustrated when this happens 

Well said Caroline, it's certainly frustrating when this happens.   

[maggie]

Well said Caroline, it's certainly frustrating when this happens.   

I see its mentioned in the Wireless Message Logs by admin as a fact but thees no attachmen

[Lugg]

You've seen it Hartley because I have found posts from you that makes reference to it...I think it was posted when Keira was talking about the James Fraser Bell.....I'll have another look for it later today. 

I don't think he's actually seen it? I think he quoted a book that had it written in there?