The Dogs

[tyler]

By the way..it is Major Incident PROJECT and not REPORT. Don't know if that makes any difference? Makes me inclined to think it is some kind of surveillance operation though.

[maggie]

I don't see how it could be Jeremy tbh.Surely due to the timings he couldn't have got to the farm by 03.45? And also the police would have first observed him in Pages lane where he pulled up in his car and not in the farm itself?

It also ALLEDGEDLY said further on in the report that PC Myall requested fingerprinting so dont see how it could have been JB.

[tyler]

If the document refers to night of the murders,the only explanation I can think of is that the officers arrived at the farm earlier than they have stated "officially",and genuinely did spot somebody. As Maggie pointed out,EP have juggled times around in this case to suit their purpose.

[tyler]

Maggie...I have seen where the doc refers to fingerprints. It is on the forum somewhere!

[Lugg]

Lol where did 'dog it' come from in my post?

Yes I was going to ask you what a photo dog was? I expected to see a well dressed dog in a bow tie.

[Bridget]

Yes I was going to ask you what a photo dog was? I expected to see a well dressed dog in a bow tie.

It's this iPad thingy, it thinks it knows what I intend to write better than I do..

[-Harters-]

It certainly makes my aprehension over Lomax's claim, to be quite fair, his interpretation is very open to question.

Personally I think it refers either to JB arriving, or as Tyler suggests it refers to another day. Tyler is likely correct.

[maggie]

It certainly makes my aprehension over Lomax's claim, to be quite fair, his interpretation is very open to question.

Personally I think it refers either to JB arriving, or as Tyler suggests it refers to another day. Tyler is likely correct.

hartley, what do you mean another day? I dont understand, sorry.

[Lugg]

If the document refers to night of the murders,the only explanation I can think of is that the officers arrived at the farm earlier than they have stated "officially",and genuinely did spot somebody. As Maggie pointed out,EP have juggled times around in this case to suit their purpose.

Of course they juggled times. That is the purpose of the debriefing. I can't understand why folk don't believe this? This is normal police practice. Their concern at a debriefing is to make sure all police statements complement each other. That is why you get the impression that they are all telling the truth both in their statements and at trial.
It is IMPOSSIBLE" statement to be exactly the same. But by some miracle they are remarkably similar. This does NOT  mean that what they say is the truth. What it does indicate and that quite strongly that there was collusion among them. I know that what I say seems incredible. But believe me this is exactly what happens at a police debriefing.

[tyler]

I've been thinking about this. If the project report referred to surveillance,then I can't see who would likely be at whf at 03.45am post murders?

[tyler]

I can't see how it could refer to JB either. The police arrived at the farm before him,so they would have to have been there prior to 0.3.45 to record his arrival. What time was their car despatched?

[-Harters-]

hartley, what do you mean another day? I dont understand, sorry.

A day other than the 7th August 1985.

[Patti]

I'd like to see all 69 entries on the Major Incident Report. 

         69 ITEMS                  MAJOR INCIDENT REPORT                                      PAGE 1 OF 2

ITEM              SU                                      FO                                                AD

       1.           0345  S11 MYALL               UNIDENT MALE 0001                      WHITE HSE FM
       2.           2011  N94                         UNIDENT MALE 0029                       PAGES LN
       3.           2015  N94                         UNIDENT MALE 0038                       PAGES LN

[-Harters-]

I'd like to see all 69 entries on the Major Incident Report. 

         69 ITEMS                  MAJOR INCIDENT REPORT                                      PAGE 1 OF 2

ITEM              SU                                      FO                                                AD

       1.           0345  S11 MYALL               UNIDENT MALE 0001                      WHITE HSE FM
       2.           2011  N94                         UNIDENT MALE 0029                       PAGES LN
       3.           2015  N94                         UNIDENT MALE 0038                       PAGES LN

I'd like to see the original document.

Plus Myalls, Bews and Saxbys first statements, but I've asked for those once or twice before I think.   

[-Harters-]

By the way..it is Major Incident PROJECT and not REPORT. Don't know if that makes any difference? Makes me inclined to think it is some kind of surveillance operation though.

If it's PROJECT, then the above table has been copied out incorrectly?