The Eatons, Boutflours, Bambers, Pargeters. All seemingly honest, well respected in their communities, 7th Aug 1985, Bambers gone, wiped out, Jeremy Bamber survives.......
From that point on, there isn't one thing that the relatives did that I wouldn't have done myself, with the exception of taking the silencer out onto the table at Oak Farm. The number of lies and allegations from this point on are far too numerous to go into here and now. Propoganda is not strong enough a word to describe the endless accusations and theories, but in 27 years, 2 appeals, investigations, books, documentaries, forums, he's still where he is.
Establishment cover up? Absolute rubbish. Far more embarrassing cases have been overturned in the past 27 years.
From that point on, if I was truly
innocent, I'd have acted very differently. The inconsistencies in his story and subsequent retelling of it are too many. His memory fails at times then regains clarity. As I said 2 years ago, he is either guilty, or the unluckiest man alive.
But my main point in answer to your post is this. I hear an accusation and I respond. If you say that the family 'stole' from Bamber then I will respond, because it isn't true. If you were to say to me that the family have been cute in avoiding paying bamber anything over the years for his shares, then I'd happily agree. It's the manner of it, not the subject.
Over the years the family have had to endure hundreds of accusations from Mike Tesko. He regularly finds a bit of paper, adds 2 and 2 and gets 76. As Bambers plight has got more serious he has started completely making things up. That is evil, nasty and utterly shameful. So please don't lecture me on poor old Bamber getting slagged off.
How many times have you been told, since you supported Bamber, this is it, this is the evidence, be out by Christmas, blah blah blah.
He's had media support, TV documentaries, lawyers, etc etc....but it always falls short, often because what you are told as a supporter is not the reality. Take the Suthurst photographs for example. For years we hear about it, see interviews about it, Suthurst agrees with Bamber (not the other way around) CCRC say no you can't see the area from the crime scene photos, Suthurst says "yes, I agree" and another episode of false allegations against the relatives quietly goes away!
You have a very compelling prisoner, feeding highly questionable material, to his willing Elves, who show you just enough to make it believable but not enough to prove him wrong. And remember, as a family, they do not have the documentation to be able to back up defences to accusations. The Police have that and do not engage in chat rooms.
