I have been re reading about the pyjama,s that he had on that dreadful night.
It has been assumed that the pyjama bottoms had been pulled down to humiliate Ralph in some way.
This got me thinking [at last] that perhaps the bottoms were not pulled down at all.
We have all been wondering how Ralph got burnt on the back without any marks on the pyjama top.
I would suggest that he did not have it on at the time. There were no bullet holes in the sleeve, and there should have been as he was shot there. there were no bullet holes in the pyjama,s at all.
It is possible that rather than undressing Ralph an attempt had been made to dress him.
The pyjama top would have reasonably easy to do, but the bottoms would have been a bit of problem as he would needed to be lifted to fit the bottoms properly.This was likely to have been impossible so the bottoms were left around his knees.
I realise that at some stage Ralph would have had to have been naked, but I sleep in the buff.
Your thoughts please.
Hi Buddy, I think you make some interesting points. NB was hit in the left shoulder and left arm, thus being that there had to be at least two holes in his pajamas's. Oddly enough, there would have also have been burn marks on the back of his pajama's....
Of course, it could have been that he had his sleeves rolled up, but on saying that there still would heve been a hole on the shoulder of his top....People could easily say that the PJ's were were pulled down and his back were burnt....But looking at it again, it seems unlikely that the top was on if there were no holes in them at all......
I can't find any evidence that suggest that there were holes in them on not?



? I wonder if there is anyway we could find out?
