I would have thought that if Jeremy bought a gun intending to kill people and not vermin that he would under pretence have bought another kind of weapon a bit larger that a .22, which from what others have said on the forum was just a bit more powerful than an air gun? One hell of a chance to take if he was intending to kill 5 people? There would be good chances that he would not have been successful in his plan. Also it is clearly evident that he had never shewn any violence to anyone before that date and from people I know testify that he was a bit of a whimp and found it difficult to kill even a small animal. In fact what these people I know said about him completely contradicts the evidence of Julie Mugford.
Two points here Lugg. The .22 is very much more powerful than an airgun. In fact it has been used as a sniping weapon. A .22 has probably got 3 times the range of an airgun.Believe me that one shot from a .22 is capable of killing a person with one shot. I am sure NGB will be able to confirm that statement.
With this in mind it was the weapon of choice.
Had the killer used a double barrelled shotgun he would have needed to reload more than once, and have a pocketful of ammo.
Jeremy can not have been the wimp that is suggested, as he was about to kill some rabbits that he had seen, so that rules that out.
Apparently Ralph had lost interest with shooting, so I wonder why he bought the .22 in the first place complete with a moderater, after all he was happy with the boom of a twelve bore. most farmers use this weapon because even if they miss the sound sends rabbits scurrying, and you will not see another rabbit for 30 minutes at least.
Can I be clear that I am a Bamber supporter, but will not agree to misinformation.