No, im not. She wouldnt have done it at WHF.
Well, the fact of the matter is that police did think she did it at whf, and they put together a case file to prove that she did (SC/688/85), and the evidence that changed everything around is dodgy to say the least, full of inconsistencies, ambiguous and contradictory. No matter which way you turn to examine the evidence relied upon to support the correctness or otherwise of these convictions there is something which just simply does not hold water, or make any sense...