Author Topic: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?  (Read 3555 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rhodes

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?
« Reply #15 on: August 06, 2012, 03:26:PM »


"Ron" Cook, perjured himself when he testified during Jeremy's trial, he told a pack of lies about the significance of the rifle that shot the fatal bullet (PV/19) under the chin of Sheila Caffell, and how the rifle itself ended up on her body in time for PC Bird to photograph it there in time for photograph 27 to 32 to be taken (after 23, not before it was taken)  - he conspired with others to cover up the circumstances relating to how the police shot and killed Sheila in the bedroom. Every member of the SOC team inside that farmhouse are involved in a conspiracy to suppress the truth about what took place, involving senior police officers, and others, who will all have to face the music at some stage now that the truth is beginning to emerge as to what took place...
I don't know why you bother with this fiction since Sheila was dead way before any police officer entered the house.  You are deluding yourself if you believe for a single moment that some anonymous police officer shot Sheila with a shot specifically targeted at her neck. Pure dribble.   ;D

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?
« Reply #16 on: August 06, 2012, 03:41:PM »
Because they were>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Sheila was examined first and foremost then Nevill, June and the twins the following day.

Well bird brain, how come the first bullets recovered during the autopsy came from Ralph Bamber, stop deluding yourself, you know nothing at all, about anything...

Bullets recovered from Ralph Bamber during autopsy:-
------------------------------------------------------------------

PV/2
PV/3
PV/4
PV/5
PV/8
PV/9
PV/10
PV/11


Bullets recovered from Sheila Caffell during autopsy:-
-----------------------------------------------------------------

PV/19
PV/20
« Last Edit: August 06, 2012, 03:46:PM by mike tesko »
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline rhodes

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?
« Reply #17 on: August 06, 2012, 03:48:PM »
Well bird brain, how come the first bullets recovered during the autopsy came from Ralph Bamber, stop deluding yourself, you know nothing at all, about anything...

Bullets recovered from Ralph Bamber during autopsy:-
------------------------------------------------------------------

PV/2
PV/3
PV/4
PV/5
PV/8
PV/9


Bullets recovered from Sheila Caffell during autopsy:-
-----------------------------------------------------------------

PV/19
PV/20

And this is relevant why exactly?

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?
« Reply #18 on: August 06, 2012, 03:57:PM »
And this is relevant why exactly?

Because the bullets were given the pathologists exhibit references (PV/2, PV/3, etc) in sequential order, and because of this the autopsy performed on Ralph Bamber must have taken place first and foremost, but this is contradicted by the numbered photographs which were taken of the autopsy performed on Ralph Bamber because these were taken after the autopsy photographs taken relating to Sheila's autopsy...

There has been one almighty mix up, for one reason or another, that should never have happened, but in this case it did? order which exhibits were taken in, contradicts order that pathology photographs were taken in - has to be a reason for this mix up / mistake?
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline rhodes

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?
« Reply #19 on: August 06, 2012, 04:23:PM »
Because the bullets were given the pathologists exhibit references (PV/2, PV/3, etc) in sequential order, and because of this the autopsy performed on Ralph Bamber must have taken place first and foremost, but this is contradicted by the numbered photographs which were taken of the autopsy performed on Ralph Bamber because these were taken after the autopsy photographs taken relating to Sheila's autopsy...

There has been one almighty mix up, for one reason or another, that should never have happened, but in this case it did? order which exhibits were taken in, contradicts order that pathology photographs were taken in - has to be a reason for this mix up / mistake?

Not necessarily, by that logic there are 14 bullets missing since the bullets references by Dr Peter Vanezis goes right up to PV36 and there only was 22 bullet casings found.

In fact if you look at the handwritten schedule the two bullets taken fro Sheila are numbered 1 and 2.

Better luck next time.   ;D

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?
« Reply #20 on: August 06, 2012, 04:36:PM »
Not necessarily, by that logic there are 14 bullets missing since the bullets references by Dr Peter Vanezis goes right up to PV36 and there only was 22 bullet casings found.

In fact if you look at the handwritten schedule the two bullets taken fro Sheila are numbered 1 and 2.

Better luck next time.   ;D

Go back to school and learn how to read...

Other so called missing PV exhibits were samples, and for your information (not that it matters) the two bullets recovered from Sheila during autopsy, had the identifying marks of PV/19 and PV/20 - oh, sorry I just made that up, like everything else I make up, by gum I've been caught out by someone with far superior intelligence to mine, I wonder how that happened, malfunction, malfunction, malfunction...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline rhodes

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?
« Reply #21 on: August 06, 2012, 04:40:PM »
Go back to school and learn how to read...

Other so called missing PV exhibits were samples, and for your information (not that it matters) the two bullets recovered from Sheila during autopsy, had the identifying marks of PV/19 and PV/20 - oh, sorry I just made that up, like everything else I make up, by gum I've been caught out by someone with far superior intelligence to mine, I wonder how that happened, malfunction, malfunction, malfunction...
Youre obviously struggling to maintain a coherent approach to this case but then again that must be hard for you with so many fantasy theories.  The police shot Sheila>>>>>>>>> what a load of bollocks.
« Last Edit: August 06, 2012, 04:41:PM by rhodes »

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?
« Reply #22 on: August 06, 2012, 04:42:PM »
Youre obviously struggling to maintain a coherent approach to this case but then again that must be hard for you with so many fantasy theories.  The police shot Sheila>>>>>>>>> what a load of bollocks.

Well, good bye then, no more bedtime stories for you, from me...


Bye...
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline rhodes

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 67
Re: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?
« Reply #23 on: August 06, 2012, 04:45:PM »
Well, good bye then, no more bedtime stories for you, from me...


Bye...
Youve been reading too many Miss Marple murder mysteries by the look of it.  Off to the Olympics for me so ta ta.....enjoy your fantasies.

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Why falsify which autopsy, was performed first?
« Reply #24 on: August 06, 2012, 04:50:PM »
Youve been reading too many Miss Marple murder mysteries by the look of it.  Off to the Olympics for me so ta ta.....enjoy your fantasies.

Bye, don't rush back you might do yourself a mischief....
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...