Phone call to police

[-Harters-]

Blame Grahame... he lent me his 'Big book of jokes'  :D

I don't think I'm allowed to. 

[Patti]

No, anybody else could not enter and exit the house undetected, besides that, the suspect pool was limited to two.

I know what Patti meant, but it's irrelevant, unless you have a time machine?

Of course anyone can enter a house, in or out. But they wont get fool forensics....You and I maybe.  Or are you saying forensics got it wrong...

Anyone can gain entry through a window....I dare bet half the country have entered their own home via a window at some point in their lives...The fact remains there is no proof JB entered the said windows on that night. We can argue till the cows come home, but I know who will win their point...moooooooo 

[-Harters-]

Of course anyone can enter a house, in or out. But they wont get fool forensics....You and I maybe.  Or are you saying forensics got it wrong...

Anyone can gain entry through a window....I dare bet half the country have entered their own home via a window at some point in their lives...The fact remains there is no proof JB entered the said windows on that night. We can argue till the cows come home, but I know who will win their point...moooooooo 

No, only Jeremy appeared to know how to enter and exit, then bang the latch shut from the outside.

What's your point? You know I believe he is guilty and I know that you disagree. Is there any point to all this point scoring? 

[Patti]

No, only Jeremy appeared to know how to enter and exit, then bang the latch shut from the outside.

What's your point? You know I believe he is guilty and I know that you disagree. Is there any point to all this point scoring? 

Yes, but he did not know how to lock the latch....his family did though.  Do you think he would have left a note for BW telling her to secure a lock on the window, if he knew how to lock it...I'm afraid the window locking through a umpteen bangs from the outside was never witnessed by the jury, other that the family and one officer that wasn't paying that much attention...

I am talking to you Hartley....having a debate, is that not what you are here for? Sorry if I upset you...I shall ignore you in the future. 

[-Harters-]

Yes, but he did not know how to lock the latch....his family did though.  Do you think he would have left a note for BW telling her to secure a lock on the window, if he knew how to lock it...I'm afraid the window locking through a umpteen bangs from the outside was never witnessed by the jury, other that the family and one officer that wasn't paying that much attention...

I am talking to you Hartley....having a debate, is that not what you are here for? Sorry if I upset you...I shall ignore you in the future. 

I believe he did know how to. The jury believed that he did know how to. The jury believed that he told Julie that he did know how to.

Nobody else knew how to, which also helped to limit the suspects to two, along with Ralphs alleged call to Jeremy.

You haven't upset me, I am completely unupsettable, I'm just a bit bored of some the point scoring at times, that's all, no offence intended.

If people can't accept that others may have a different view then I'd suggest the problem is with them. 

[jon]

I believe he did know how to. The jury believed that he did know how to. The jury believed that he told Julie that he did know how to.

Nobody else knew how to, which is helped to limit the suspects to two, along with Ralphs alleged call to Jeremy.

You haven't upset me, I am completely unupsettable, I'm just a bit bored of some the point scoring at times, that's all, no offence intended.

If people can't accept that others may have a different view then I'd suggest the problem is with them. 

Hartley , once on here MT made a mistake over something that you rightly
pointed out was wrong , you responded with , ' don't you just love it when that happens ' ,
was you point scoring then ? Or are you again talking nonsense above ?

[-Harters-]

Hartley , once on here MT made a mistake over something that you rightly
pointed out was wrong , you responded with , ' don't you just love it when that happens ' ,
was you point scoring then ? Or are you again talking nonsense above ?

No Jon, that was showing that Mike was telling lies on a particular issue.

Why so obsessed with me? You know my views on the case, so what what do you want from me?

That's rhetorical by the way, I'm not intrested in your rudeness and goading, sorry. 

[jon]

No Jon, that was showing that Mike was telling lies on a particular issue.

Why so obsessed with me? You know my views on the case, so what what do you want from me?

That's rhetorical by the way, I'm not intrested in your rudeness and goading, sorry. 

Was you telling lies over SC appointments at the doctors ?
If you look back you replied to me first !!
I will let others judge , who is rude and goads !!

[-Harters-]

Was you telling lies over SC appointments at the doctors ?
If you look back you replied to me first !!
I will let others judge , who is rude and goads !!

People should start here when judging then:

 

Not that you need to read it Hartley , but as you are no doubt aware this is what i meant , i have noticed you making a lot of mistakes on here in the last few days , i hope you have found out whether SC did miss appointments at the doctors , or who produced what log at court , i think there was another , regarding NB chair  !! Do you think you will ever make a mistake and it will point to JB's innocence ? Or will even your mistakes always point to his guilt ?
I forgot my  , do grow up !!

[Neil]

Yes, but he did not know how to lock the latch....his family did though.  Do you think he would have left a note for BW telling her to secure a lock on the window, if he knew how to lock it...I'm afraid the window locking through a umpteen bangs from the outside was never witnessed by the jury, other that the family and one officer that wasn't paying that much attention...

I am talking to you Hartley....having a debate, is that not what you are here for? Sorry if I upset you...I shall ignore you in the future. 

When did he leave the note for BW?  Was it on the occasion after the murders, when he entered WHF via the window, to collect his passport?

[-Harters-]

When did he leave the note for BW?  Was it on the occasion after the murders, when he entered WHF via the window, to collect his passport?

Was it his passport?

[Neil]

Was it his passport?

Oh, probably not, my mistake.  Whatever it was, the same question applies.

[-Harters-]

Oh, probably not, my mistake.  Whatever it was, the same question applies.

I don't know that it wasn't his passport, I just haven't read that before that's all.

[Neil]

I don't know that it wasn't his passport, I just haven't read that before that's all.

I was referring to the occasion, shortly after the murders when he gained entry to the farm house via the window.  He claimed that he was retrieving documents of one sort or another.  Somebody earlier on in this thread stated that he left a note for BW, asking her to make sure that the window was secured.  Was this note left on the occasion I've just mentioned? Or on another occasion? 

[-Harters-]

I was referring to the occasion, shortly after the murders when he gained entry to the farm house via the window.  He claimed that he was retrieving documents of one sort or another.  Somebody earlier on in this thread stated that he left a note for BW, asking her to make sure that the window was secured.  Was this note left on the occasion I've just mentioned? Or on another occasion?

I understood when you meant, I just hadn't seen the passport mentioned before.

It must surely have been on that occasion if it happened, any idea where this originally get's mentioned? It's not in BW's statement that is available on the forum.