So, none of the 6 members of the raid team saw/heard Sheila flee upstairs or even noticed that she was no longer downstairs? She then collapsed on the bed and some time after 09.00 a member of the SOC team (believing her to be dead) took a photograph of her on the bed with a solitary wound. At that time of course, the 6 (or at least some) members of the raid team must have been aware that she was no longer downstairs. Then she "awoke" and was shot by the police?
And that is the basis of the whole cover-up?
Do I have this sequence of events correct?
The alternative explanation is that the reference to Sheila being dead downstairs is a simple mistake?
Which of these explanations is the more credible (I pose rhetorically)?
Mike, all you have to do is to produce the photograph!
In the absence of you producing this photograph, JB's Defence team WILL NOT seek to persuade any Court in the land that your version of events is correct !!!