« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10   Go Down

Author Topic: Sheila's feet  (Read 16954 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Sheila's feet
« on: February 12, 2011, 04:40:PM »
It's been said that Sheila's feet were "clean" but I'm not sure what that means. One way or another, Sheila walked into the main bedroom (unless she was carried), and I presume that happened after June was shot. Why then did Sheila not have June's blood on the bottom of her feet? There were spots of blood all over the carpet.
Logged

Offline mike tesko

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 51079
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2011, 04:49:PM »
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 04:40:PM
It's been said that Sheila's feet were "clean" but I'm not sure what that means. One way or another, Sheila walked into the main bedroom (unless she was carried), and I presume that happened after June was shot. Why then did Sheila not have June's blood on the bottom of her feet? There were spots of blood all over the carpet.
----------------------------------

She did have blood on her feet...
Logged
"Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive"...

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2011, 04:50:PM »
Quote from: mike tesko on February 12, 2011, 04:49:PM
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 04:40:PM
It's been said that Sheila's feet were "clean" but I'm not sure what that means. One way or another, Sheila walked into the main bedroom (unless she was carried), and I presume that happened after June was shot. Why then did Sheila not have June's blood on the bottom of her feet? There were spots of blood all over the carpet.
----------------------------------

She did have blood on her feet...

Oh, OK. I thought they didn't find much of anything on her feet.
Logged

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2011, 06:34:PM »
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 04:50:PM
Quote from: mike tesko on February 12, 2011, 04:49:PM
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 04:40:PM
It's been said that Sheila's feet were "clean" but I'm not sure what that means. One way or another, Sheila walked into the main bedroom (unless she was carried), and I presume that happened after June was shot. Why then did Sheila not have June's blood on the bottom of her feet? There were spots of blood all over the carpet.
----------------------------------

She did have blood on her feet...

Oh, OK. I thought they didn't find much of anything on her feet.

Where is it documented that she had blood on her feet?
Logged

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2011, 06:40:PM »
Quote from: Hartley on February 12, 2011, 06:34:PM
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 04:50:PM
Quote from: mike tesko on February 12, 2011, 04:49:PM
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 04:40:PM
It's been said that Sheila's feet were "clean" but I'm not sure what that means. One way or another, Sheila walked into the main bedroom (unless she was carried), and I presume that happened after June was shot. Why then did Sheila not have June's blood on the bottom of her feet? There were spots of blood all over the carpet.
----------------------------------

She did have blood on her feet...

Oh, OK. I thought they didn't find much of anything on her feet.

Where is it documented that she had blood on her feet?

Is that question for Mike? I haven't seen anything which says she had blood on her feet.
Logged

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2011, 06:44:PM »
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 06:40:PM
Quote from: Hartley on February 12, 2011, 06:34:PM
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 04:50:PM
Quote from: mike tesko on February 12, 2011, 04:49:PM
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 04:40:PM
It's been said that Sheila's feet were "clean" but I'm not sure what that means. One way or another, Sheila walked into the main bedroom (unless she was carried), and I presume that happened after June was shot. Why then did Sheila not have June's blood on the bottom of her feet? There were spots of blood all over the carpet.
----------------------------------

She did have blood on her feet...

Oh, OK. I thought they didn't find much of anything on her feet.

Where is it documented that she had blood on her feet?

Is that question for Mike? I haven't seen anything which says she had blood on her feet.

Sorry Kaldin, yes that question was directed towards Mike.

I'd read that Sheilas feet were clean but it's unsure if that was before she had been cleaned in readiness for post mortem. Nevertheless I haven't seen anything indicating that she had blood on her feet. Just curious really.
Logged

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2011, 06:53:PM »
Quote from: Hartley on February 12, 2011, 06:44:PM
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 06:40:PM
Quote from: Hartley on February 12, 2011, 06:34:PM
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 04:50:PM
Quote from: mike tesko on February 12, 2011, 04:49:PM
Quote from: Kaldin on February 12, 2011, 04:40:PM
It's been said that Sheila's feet were "clean" but I'm not sure what that means. One way or another, Sheila walked into the main bedroom (unless she was carried), and I presume that happened after June was shot. Why then did Sheila not have June's blood on the bottom of her feet? There were spots of blood all over the carpet.
----------------------------------

She did have blood on her feet...

Oh, OK. I thought they didn't find much of anything on her feet.

Where is it documented that she had blood on her feet?

Is that question for Mike? I haven't seen anything which says she had blood on her feet.

Sorry Kaldin, yes that question was directed towards Mike.

I'd read that Sheilas feet were clean but it's unsure if that was before she had been cleaned in readiness for post mortem. Nevertheless I haven't seen anything indicating that she had blood on her feet. Just curious really.

I've seen a statement by one of the police who said her feet were clean. I suppose blood stains might not be obvious unless they looked closely though.

I was also wondering what Sheila was doing in the bedroom round that side of the bed anyway.
Logged

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2011, 05:41:PM »
From the Appeal document.

Quote
The deceased's feet were also free from blood staining
Logged

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2011, 07:45:PM »
do you think sheila could have been wearing the socks that were photographed near the body?
Logged

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2011, 07:54:PM »
Quote from: andrea on February 13, 2011, 07:45:PM
do you think sheila could have been wearing the socks that were photographed near the body?

I did think they were probably Neville's but it's possible that Sheila was wearing them. I can't see any mention of those socks anywhere else - they didn't seem to be referred to at the trial.
Logged

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2011, 07:57:PM »
and photos of neville are blocked out, so its hard to tell if he was wearing socks at the time of his death,if he was then its very possible that sheila could have been wearing them. from what i can see on the photo of sheila the socks do look heavily stained.
Logged

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2011, 08:06:PM »
Quote from: andrea on February 13, 2011, 07:57:PM
and photos of neville are blocked out, so its hard to tell if he was wearing socks at the time of his death,if he was then its very possible that sheila could have been wearing them. from what i can see on the photo of sheila the socks do look heavily stained.

One of the points that the prosecution made at the trial was that Sheila's feet were very clean for someone who had allegedly rampaged through the house shooting her family. If she was not wearing socks I would expect there to have at least been some blood on the bottom of her feet whether she shot her family or not because she would surely have walked over the carpet where June's blood was.
Logged

andrea

  • Guest
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2011, 08:19:PM »
i agree kaldin, but she could have been wearing the socks that were photographed at the side of her body, and took them off for some reason before shooting herself, maybe? just a thought.
Logged

Offline Kaldin

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6961
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2011, 08:23:PM »
Quote from: andrea on February 13, 2011, 08:19:PM
i agree kaldin, but she could have been wearing the socks that were photographed at the side of her body, and took them off for some reason before shooting herself, maybe? just a thought.

She could have. I wonder why the defence didn't suggest that. Perhaps they didn't see the socks.
Logged

Offline mb1

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 514
Re: Sheila's feet
« Reply #14 on: February 13, 2011, 08:27:PM »
But they had the photo?

The clean feet were always going to be big deal. Preparing for the case they would have thought of that.

Were the washed 'leggings' on the bannisters footless or tights? Were there socks in soak with the bloody underwear?
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10   Go Up
« previous next »