It amazes me how someone can change their mind on Jeremy Bambers guilt or innocence by whoever they decide to be friendly with. One minute stating something as fact (today) and another dismissing something as just part of a story in a book that's not factual
See below
andrea
Guest
Re: do the topless photos exist
« Reply #75 on: May 23, 2011, 10:39:PM »
Quote
it is definately in the claire powell book, its in that book that she mentions the meeting at the pub, where they allegedly tried to do a deal with the reporter for the pictures. i have that book, its called murder at whithouse farm.
Report to moderator Logged
Tyler
Guest
Re: do the topless photos exist
« Reply #76 on: May 23, 2011, 10:46:PM »
Quote
Quote from: andrea on May 23, 2011, 10:39:PM
it is definately in the claire powell book, its in that book that she mentions the meeting at the pub, where they allegedly tried to do a deal with the reporter for the pictures. i have that book, its called murder at whithouse farm.
Yep,thats the one Andrea
.Do you believe it happened? Only,Claire writing about that meeting obviously put Jeremy in a bad light and yet in most of the book,she seems quite supportive of him.Thats what made me wonder if it was indeed true.
andrea
Guest
Re: do the topless photos exist
« Reply #77 on: May 24, 2011, 08:22:AM »
ive no idea tyler, she gets a lot of things wrong in that book. for instance when june caught sheila in the field with colin, powell said it was a farmhand and that they were having sex in a ditch. cc himself told the true story. the book aint that reliable but is any book?
grahame
Guest
Re: do the topless photos exist
« Reply #78 on: May 24, 2011, 08:40:AM »
Quote
Quote from: andrea on May 24, 2011, 08:22:AM
ive no idea tyler, she gets a lot of things wrong in that book. for instance when june caught sheila in the field with colin, powell said it was a farmhand and that they were having sex in a ditch. cc himself told the true story. the book aint that reliable but is any book?
Now that is a very relevant statement Andrea. How many of us take for granted that which a certain book says is true? Or how many of us check up on the writer of the book to see what they themselves believe? Very few of us are neutral on any subject and what we write may reflect that which we ourselves believe and not what is actually true?
Again you can see this prejudice in the forum as well. Someone may believe in something so strongly that they cannot see the truth and indeed refuse even to read another person's opinion from the opposite side. What makes this even more confusing is that, that person is convinced that they are looking at all things fairly.